Talk:2020 New York State Assembly election

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

WilliamBarclay.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 December 2020: Regarding plural elections

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 19:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 New York State Assembly election → 2020 New York State Assembly elections – There are many (plural) elections. See, for example, 2020 United States House of Representatives elections.

This would apply to all states' elections since 1787. That's a lot, I know, and I don't think I can post this on literally thousands of talk pages.

Furthermore, if approved, how could all these pages be moved without having to do it manually? —GoldRingChip 21:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NC-GAL (the fifth bullet point: For elections to particular bodies or offices, default to the form "Date [adjectival form of country name] Body/Office election", as in: 2007 Scottish Parliament election, 2008 Nepalese Constituent Assembly election, or 2011 Kentucky Attorney General election.). These articles are not on multiple elections, they are one election to a single legislature (the excuse I have heard before for the use of the plural is that voting takes places in multiple constituencies, but this is the case in numerous elections, including the first two cited in the guideline, and we still use the singular). The US House and Senate elections are the ones that need moving to comply with the naming guideline – they are the exception to the rule rather a justification for a move here. Number 57 12:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, this RM can't be used to move thousands of other articles unless they are also tagged – a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS cannot be used to override a naming guideline. Number 5 7 12:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I completely agree on this point of RM methodology, as I couldn't figure out a better way to solicit discussion. Clearly you noticed this, which is great, and sufficiently convinced me to the contrary. Thank you. —GoldRingChip 15:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.