Talk:2014 June rugby union tests

Requested moves

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as proposed. (non-admin closure) Calidum ^{Talk To Me} 05:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– A number of matches listed in those articles are not tests; there are several tour matches against club/provincial/regional/invitational sides included which do not have test status. While it makes logical sense that these are listed in the same article, the articles should be renamed to reflect that more than just test matches are included in those articles. The term "internationals" should be generic enough to describe it accurately without sounding clumsy like "tests and tour matches" or the like. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 07:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've got no problem with that move. It had been discussed in the past, but nothing came off the discussion. At that time we agreed that matches would be on here if organized or accepted by the IRB, hens why some of the matches are not test matches. Rugby.change (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No objections from me. During a move, a redirect is set up, correct? Grande (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should be! TheMightyPeanut (talk) 14:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Over the years we were forced to remove games from the articles because some editors didn't consider them good enough to be listed as they were not "tests", I think this change was long overdue...--Stemoc (talk) 01:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I believe that it is reasonable to include, for example, Crusaders v England (for completeness) so article ought to be renamed to reflect that it includes non-test matches. Hamish59 (talk) 07:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I'm not hugely worried with the status quo, but the proposal makes sense and am happy to support. -- Shudde ^talk 03:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 mid-year rugby union internationals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]