Talk:2013 Yorkshire Bank 40

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2018. The result of the discussion was SNOW keep.

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

On 27 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to 2013 ECB 40. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Move Article

I think this article should be moved to 2013 Yorkshire Bank 40. I'm not exactly sure how that process would work. Can someone do that? Rougue1987 (talk) 00:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 00:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– The tournament name was ECB 40, as per the article being listed there. Clydesdale and Yorkshire Bank were just sponsor names, which don't need to be used, as per WP:NOTADVERTISING. This is the same as how all t20 Blast (formerly Twenty20 Cup) season articles use the non sponsored name, and is also what we do for most other cricket season articles when a common, non-sponsored name exists. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 17:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose WP:NOTADVERTISING doesn't actually cover this in the slightest, and "ECB 40" was never used other than a few articles during its formation, and so is not at all a WP:COMMONNAME. WP:CRITERIA tells us to aim for:
1. Recognizability – Nope.
2. Naturalness – Nope.
3. Precision – Sure.
4. Concision – Yes.
5. Consistency – Sort of, although Benson & Hedges Cup retains its sponsor name, and the Friends Provident Trophy and its relevant seasons all maintain theirs too.

How many sources use ECB 40 after 2009 articles about its creation, and a handful in 2010? I can't find any? Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 12:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— Relisting. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 18:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WikiProjects WP:CRICKET and WP:UK have been notified of this discussion. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 18:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to think we're better off sticking with what we have unless we can show a widespread use of the name. Each of those could be, however, helpful redirects. The naming of one-day tournaments has been linked with sponsors since they started pretty much. It'd difficult to get around these. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Harrias. Normally I am dead against sponsorship names, but mostly around grounds and tournaments like the County Championship. However, here an exception can be made per WP:COMMONNAME and it aligns with the other English one-day tournament from 1963 to present: Gillette Cup, NatWest Trophy, C&G Trophy etc. StickyWicket (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.