Talk:2013 Saravan earthquake

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2013 Saravan earthquake article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving 2013 Saravan earthquake was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 16 April 2013.

Wikipedia

Earthquakes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan: Balochistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Balochistan, Pakistan (assessed as Mid-importance).

What is the cause for this?

what is the cause for this ?? where all will the after effect be felt?? are there any warnings of future quakes and tremors?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.227.56 (talk) 12:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is not such warning of more damage, please read the references at the article for more info! Faizan -Let's talk! 13:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties

Any source for the casualties besides in Iran and Pakistan? Qrfqr (talk) 22:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all them damage occurred due to the quake was in Iran and Pakistan only, read the references for more! Faizan -Let's talk! 06:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Can we get a better locator map? Preferably one that contains all of Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan, plus the neighbouring sea region. This is so offcenter on the current map as to be almost off the edge. The suggested map would center the epicenter. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 08:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well it only took about 7 years. I've added a map of "Southwest Asia" as an alternative for those that would prefer a broader perspective. Mikenorton (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Country borders

Someone should replace the map under tectonics with a map from this time period. USSR and Yugoslavia don't exist by 2013, at least in our timeline… Ivucica (talk) 07:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Magnitude & References

USGS says 7.7, should I change it? References need to be updates, at least/especially the USGS references. Pubserv (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One of the USGS refs was broken, so I replace it with another citation to the other working reference from the USGS. I also updated the magnitude to 7.7 - thanks. Mikenorton (talk) 21:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Louisiana State University/HNRS 1035:Natural Disturbances and Society" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Article Contribution

Hello. I am a student at Louisiana State University and I want to contribute to this article. I would like to add at least three sections entitled "Public Response," History," and "Preparedness." In these three sections I will add information about how the Iranian citizens viewed the Sistan and Baluchestan earthquake, the historical activity of this area, and comment on the increased earthquake activity in this area. I also want to state how prepared those affected were for the earthquake and how prepared and effective the Red Crescent and the Red Cross were in this instance.

If you have any questions or comments you can contact me on my talk page.

Thank you.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2013 Saravan earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]