Talk:2009 Chicago Cubs season
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Game log legend
[edit]It's a nice idea, but is the legend really necessary? If one looks at the game log itself, it's easy to tell if the Cubs won or lost by looking at the winning pitcher. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 19:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, the log is not needed. The other seasons don't have one, so why should this be any different? Sweet Pea 1981 (talk) 20:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Notice of automatic game-day update
[edit]Hello! This is a friendly notice from OgreBot of upcoming automatic update of this page. Information is located WT:BASEBALL#Bot ready; please feel free to comment! OgreBot (talk) 10:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
161?
[edit]How do you end up with 161 games at the end of a season? 018 (talk) 23:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- Stub-Class Baseball articles
- Mid-importance Baseball articles
- Stub-Class Chicago Cubs articles
- Unknown-importance Chicago Cubs articles
- Chicago Cubs articles
- WikiProject Baseball articles
- Stub-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Illinois articles