Talk:2006 ball-tampering controversy

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Referees Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Referees WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Referees. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.RefereesWikipedia:WikiProject RefereesTemplate:WikiProject RefereesReferees articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Darrell Hair was copied or moved into Ball tampering controversy in August 2006 with this edit on 13 June 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Atherton? LOL

Quoting Atherton, himself known for being involved in a controversy with the umpires (to put it mildly), is just ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.17.102 (talk) 20:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ball tampering controversy in August 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110629190158/http://www.sportinglife.com/cricket/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=cricket/06/11/04/CRICKET_Hair_Timeline.html to http://www.sportinglife.com/cricket/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=cricket/06/11/04/CRICKET_Hair_Timeline.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ball tampering controversy in August 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ball tampering controversy in August 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ball tampering controversy in August 2006 → 2006 ball tampering controversy – More common way these are described. No other ball tampering controversies in 2006 worthy of an individual article (see Ball tampering. AIRcorn (talk) 00:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. St Anselm (talk) 04:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support but amend to more explicit "2006 Pakistani ball-tampering controversy". This pairs with 2018 Australian ball-tampering scandal. Bjenks (talk) 02:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's the difference between a "controversy" and a "scandal"? St Anselm (talk) 01:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't care whether controversy or scandal is used, but this involves much more than Pakistan. You could argue it is also an Australian one given Hairs is front and centre. AIRcorn (talk) 03:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. It seems to be standard on Wikipedia to put the date first; there's no need to include the month, and I don't think 'Pakistani' is really needed either as there's no ambiguity here. Robofish (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 16 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. This also allowed us to merge the page histories after an old old cut-and-paste move that wasn't discovered in the course of the previous request. Dekimasuよ! 03:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2006 ball tampering controversy → 2006 ball-tampering controversy – As per related discussion at Talk:2018 Australian ball-tampering scandal#Requested move 11 July 2018, in this instance "ball-tampering controversy" is a compound adjective and thus requires a hyphen. For this reason and consistency with the mentioned article, this one should be moved to the hyphenated name. I tried being WP:BOLD but that name has already been used and was redirected to a different location (which I have now changed to here). Spike 'em (talk) 11:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom/previous discussion. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per proper English grammar. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per previous RM discussion. – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support: exactly as the nominator says; it's grammatically correct to include the hyphen. Richard3120 (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.