Talk:2006 Dublin Senior Football Championship
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Error
[edit]Dublin SFC Parnell Park May 10 Parnell Park St Brigids A 3-10 Naomh Mearnóg 2-6 , this lists the round as parnell park (Gnevin 00:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC))
- Is this a second round fixture or backdoor ? (Gnevin 19:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC))
Appears to be the second round as Brigids go on the fourth round, backdoor winners go on to the third round along with the second round losers, tis probably my mistake on the page, thanks, Frainc 20:36 18 October 2006
Relegation and promotion
[edit]Should their be a relegation and promotion section? Frainc 03 September 2006 12:00
Who was relegated this year? Frainc 14 October 2006 01:26
League
[edit]I was thinking of starting a article on the Dublin Senior League, any recommendations for a title? Frainc 13:07 21 November 2006.
- What do people think of Dublin AFL Division 1? Frainc 13:10 21 November 2006.
Dublin Players
[edit]Is it worth mentioning the lack of Dublin players on the UCD team etc as part of the intro to the final? Frainc 28 October 2006 12:24
- No , maybe add something to UCD saying the club is made up of alot of country members but it's pov too add it here imo (Gnevin 21:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC))
Fair use rationale for Image:Dublinnewcrest.png
[edit]Image:Dublinnewcrest.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Citations
[edit]I've fixed the tense in this article. I've slapped a tag on it saying that there aren't any citations. In going through the article to fix the tense and other issues I did actually find links to external news stories, but they need to be formatted as proper citations; simply dropping a link into the page isn't really good enough. I've seen articles being nominated for deletion before for not having citations, so if anyone else wants to work on this in the meantime then go ahead. This is a decent article with plenty of detail, it just needs citations. I think it actually has potential for a GA. --Eamonnca1 (talk) 01:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)