This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Oppose building was central to two separate events: 1973 Hanafi Muslim massacre and 1977 Washington, D.C. attack and hostage taking. Substantive coverage of building exists in relationship to both (books and journal articles), plus coverage of building in the context of the neighborhood generated by the heavily armed militants living inside and patrolling the grounds in what has always been a quiet neighborhood of green lawns and comfortable homes - except for this one building. Presently usefully linked form several articles. E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are many sources that mention the building, but none about the building have been cited. That means the building doesn't satisfy our guideline to qualify for its own encyclopedia article. — MShabazzTalk/Stalk18:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, there is zero coverage. The sources are all articles about other subjects that mention the house. Are there any sources about the house? Not its owners, not the neighborhood, not the murders or the hostage-taking, but the building itself? If not, it doesn't satisfy WP:NGEO, no matter how many times you assert that it does. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk00:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No matter how many times you repeat your opinion, the fact remains that the historic significance of this house is sourced to WP:INDEPTH is articles and a book chapter'; a place does not have to be the sole topic of a source as long as it contains SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - True, a place doesn't need to be the main topic of a body of work but it actually needs to be a topic. A good case has been made for indepth sources related to incidents that just so happened to take place in and around the building but notability is not inherited to everything in those said incidents. Malik Shabazz made a crucial point with this: "The sources are all articles about other subjects that mention the house. Are there any sources about the house?" If we look honestly at the sources, the answer is a definitive no.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per ongoing AfD discussion. Decide, either close this or the AfD discussion. WP:GNG applies here anyway, plus extensive sourcing.BabbaQ (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]