Talk:100,000,000

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 100,000,000 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Numbers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Untitled 2005 comment

This is the page to jot down interesting facts about 9-digit numbers. If enough (at least three) interesting facts are gathered about a particular 9-digit number, it could possibly warrant its own article. PrimeFan 19:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus to move. —Mets501 (talk) 16:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 100000000 (number) to hundred million. Similar to how 1000000 (number) was moved to million, this article should be at hundred million. See also similar proposal for ten million and billion. Voortle 00:03, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~

Support per my reasons above. Voortle 00:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. "million" is about the same length as "1000000", but "hundred million" is significantly longer than "100000000". (I opposed the first move to "million", for what it's worth, and I still oppose this move.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hundred million is longer than 100000000 but shorter than 100000000 (number). Voortle 00:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Factorial Of 100,000,000

Does any body knows the value of 100000000 factorial?

Is it possible to calculate the value of 100000000 factorial? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.197.2 (talk) 11:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. It would take some time, would be very large and not very interesting. The last 20,000,000 digits are 0. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 07:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The last 24999999 digits are 0. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. And you can find the number of trailing zeros for other powers of 10, in sequence A173228 of OEIS. number of trailing zeros in 10^n!. Furthermore, factorial 100,000,000 has approximately 710,330,400 digits, so good luck on calculating it. Dhrm77 (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to 100,000,000 (non-admin closure). SST flyer 11:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

100000000 (number) → 100,000,000 (number) – it's hard to tell how many zeroes there are from the present title. Fish567 (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support, it makes no lexical difference but helps from a readability standpoint Deelay58 (talk)
Support, argument makes sense and is better than the current title, also makes WP:consistency sense (see 1,000,000,000). Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support as both comments above. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to 100,000,000 as an unnecessary disambiguator. Otherwise, Support. Ppp ery 02:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to 100,000,000 to make it easier for the reader. Andrewa (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

These languages do not have single words for a thousand to the second

A million (a thousand to the second) in Chinese is 百萬 bǎiwàn --Backinstadiums (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:300 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

232,792,560

There is a discussion at Talk:10,000,000#Trivial_asides that may affect this article. Meters (talk) 09:23, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]