Talk:(410777) 2009 FD

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the (410777) 2009 FD article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Corrected diameter

I wonder if someone who knows more about this than myself could update this article. Apparently there is an estimate (Mainzer, A. et al. (2013) Astrophys. J.) of the albedo that significantly increases the diameter to 0.472 km. This would imply that the Palermo is also significantly under estimated. I believe this would make it positive if the calculation were redone in light of the additional information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.187.174.15 (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a link to Amy's paper? I would love to read about the measurement uncertainties. -- Kheider (talk) 01:04, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - It give a diameter of 0.472 +- 0.045 km much less than the uncertainty based on M alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.213.169.71 (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on (410777) 2009 FD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2009fd.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2009fd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on (410777) 2009 FD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030402122939/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/ to http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]