Talk:Überetsch Railway

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page move

According to a quick google search, "Oltradige railroad" is the most common name in English:

Why was the page moved to this title?--Suppar luca 14:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if you look at the results of your 1st search you will see, that they are all copies from the old wikipedia article i.e. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], so these 176 have no value. The German name was: "Überetscher Bahn" a search for which in English returns 0 usable results [6], the Italian name was Ferrovia Bolzano-Caldaro, with also 0 results in English [7] or Ferrovia Elettrica Transatesina also 0 English results [8] - as the Überetsch consists of the comuni of Kaltern and Eppan (93,06% German and 87,16% German) and as you made it clear today, we must be consistent in applying the naming convention for places: therefore Überetsch -> Überetscher Bahn. In short: I think this was a uncontroversial move. --noclador (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

.Could you sort out all the self-reference to Wikipedia in case of "Oltradige railroad"? Because 4 out of the first 4 are actually mirroring this very same WP article, making them irrelevant to a search. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]