Jump to content

Sultanate of Sulu

Coordinates: 6°03′07″N 121°00′07″E / 6.05194°N 121.00194°E / 6.05194; 121.00194
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sulu succession dispute)
For other uses, see Sulu (disambiguation).

Sultanate of Sulu
كسلطانن سن سوڬ
Kasultanan sin Sūg
  • 1457–1915
Flag of Sulu
Flag (19th century)
Lesser coat of arms of Sulu
Lesser coat of arms
Map showing the extent of the Sultanate of Sulu in 1845, with Northeast Borneo lowlands being under its nominal control.
Map showing the extent of the Sultanate of Sulu in 1845, with Northeast Borneo lowlands being under its nominal control.
StatusBruneian vassal (1457–1578)
Sovereign state (1578–1851)
Spanish protectorate (1851–1899)
U.S. protectorate (1899–1915)
Capital
Common languagesTausug, Sama–Bajau, Malay
Religion
Sunni Islam
GovernmentMonarchy
Sultan 
• 1457–1480 (first)
Sharif ul-Hāshim
• 1894–1915 (last)
Jamalul Kiram II
History 
• Established
1457
• Temporal power ceded to the United States
22 March 1915
CurrencyPhilippine Peso
or barter for local use[3]
Preceded by		 Succeeded by
Lupah Sug
1702
Captaincy General of the Philippines
Calamianes
1860
Sultanate of Bulungan
1881
North Borneo
1915
Insular Government of the Philippines
Sulu
Today part of

The Sultanate of Sulu (Tausug: Kasultanan sin Sūg; Malay: Kesultanan Suluk; Filipino: Kasultanan ng Sulu) was a Sunni Muslim state[note 1] that ruled the Sulu Archipelago, coastal areas of Zamboanga City and certain portions of Palawan in the today's Philippines, alongside parts of present-day Sabah and North Kalimantan in north-eastern Borneo.

Part of a series on the
History of the Philippines
Timeline
Prehistoric period (pre-900)

Events/Artifacts

Precolonial period (900–1565)
Historically documented states/polities

(north to south)

Events/Artifacts

Spanish colonial period (1565–1898)
Events

Artifacts

American colonial period (1898–1946)
Post-independence (1946–1965)
Marcos era (1965–1986)
Contemporary period (1986–present)
By topic
flag Philippines portal
Part of a series on the
Pre-colonial history of the Philippines
Social classes
Ruling class (Maginoo, Ginu, Tumao)
Middle class
Commoners, serfs, and slaves
  • Aliping namamahay
  • Alipin sa gigilid
  • Bulisik
  • Bulislis
  • Horohan
  • Uripon
Political entities
Luzon
Visayas
Mindanao
Key figures
Primary sources and artifacts
By topic
See also: History of the Philippines

The sultanate was founded either on 17 November 1405 or 1457[5][note 2] by Johore-born explorer and Sunni religious scholar Sharif ul-Hashim. Paduka Mahasari Maulana al Sultan Sharif ul-Hashim became his full regnal name; Sharif-ul Hashim is his abbreviated name. He settled in Buansa, Sulu.[9][10] The sultanate gained its independence from the Bruneian Empire in 1578.[11]

At its peak, it stretched over the islands that bordered the western peninsula of Zamboanga in Mindanao in the east to Palawan in the north. It also covered areas in the northeast of Borneo, stretching from Marudu Bay, Sabah[12][13] to Tepian, Sembakung subdistrict, North Kalimantan.[14][15] Another source stated the area included stretched from Kimanis Bay, which also overlaps with the boundaries of the Bruneian Sultanate.[16] Following the arrival of western powers such as the Spanish, the British, the Dutch, French, Germans, the Sultan thalassocracy and sovereign political powers were relinquished by 1915 through an agreement that was signed with the United States.[17][18][19][20] In 1974, the Filipino government officially recognised the historical territories of the Sultanate and the head of the royal house as the Sultan of Sulu.[21]

In Kakawin Nagarakretagama, the Sultanate of Sulu is referred to as Solot, one of the countries in the Tanjungnagara archipelago (Kalimantan-Philippines), which is one of the areas that is under the influence of the mandala area of the Majapahit kingdom in the archipelago.

History

[edit]

Pre-establishment

[edit]
Map of the Sulu Archipelago
See also: Hinduism in the Philippines, Religion in pre-colonial Philippines, Indosphere, and Indianisation

The present area of the Sultanate of Sulu was once under the influence of the Bruneian Empire before it gained its own independence in 1578.[11] During the 13th century the people of Sulu began migrating to present-day Zamboanga and Sulu archipelago from their homelands in northeastern Mindanao. Scott (1994) writes that the Sulu are the descendants of ancient Butuanons and Surigaonons from the Rajahnate of Butuan, which was then Hindu, like pre-islamic Sulu. They moved south and established a spice trading port in Sulu. Sultan Batarah Shah Tengah, who ruled as sultan in 1600, was said to be an actual native of Butuan.[22] The Butuanon-Surigaonon origins of the Tausugs are suggested by the relationship of their languages, as the Butuanon, Surigaonon and Tausug languages are all members of the Southern sub-family of Visayan. Later, the earliest known settlement in this area soon to be occupied by the sultanate was in Maimbung, Jolo. During this time, Sulu was called Lupah Sug.[10] The principality of Maimbung, populated by Buranun people (or Budanon, literally means "mountain-dwellers"), was first ruled by a certain rajah who assumed the title Rajah Sipad the Older. According to Majul, the origins of the title rajah sipad originated from the Hindu sri pada, which symbolises authority.[23] The principality was instituted and governed using the system of rajahs. Sipad the Older was succeeded by Sipad the Younger.

Some Chams who migrated to Sulu were called Orang Dampuan.[24][unreliable source?] The Champa civilization and the port-kingdom of Sulu engaged in commerce with each other which resulted in merchant Chams settling in Sulu, where they were known as Orang Dampuan in the 10th–13th centuries. In contrast to their cousins in the Butuan Rajahnate, who considered themselves diplomatic competitors of Champa for China trade,[25] (under Butuan's Rajah Kiling); instead, Sulu freely traded with the Champa civilization. The Orang Dampuans from Champa however were eventually slaughtered by envious native Sulu Buranuns due to the wealth of the Orang Dampuan.[26] The Buranun were then subjected to retaliatory slaughter by the Orang Dampuan. Harmonious commerce between Sulu and the Orang Dampuan was later restored.[27] The Yakans were descendants of the Taguima-based Orang Dampuan who came to Sulu from Champa.[28] Sulu received civilization in its Indic form from the Orang Dampuan.[29]

During the reign of Sipad the Younger, a Sunni Sufi scholar and mystic[30] named Tuan Mashā′ikha[note 3] arrived in Jolo in 1280 CE.[note 4] Little is known to the origins and early biography of Tuan Mashā′ikha, except that he is a Muslim "who came from foreign lands" at the head of a fleet of Muslim traders,[32] or he was issued from a stalk of bamboo and was considered a prophet, thus well respected by the people.[33] Other reports, however, insisted that Tuan Mashā′ikha together with his parents, Jamiyun Kulisa and Indra Suga, were sent to Sulu by Alexander the Great (who is known as Iskandar Zulkarnain in Malay Annals).[23] However, Najeeb Mitry Saleeby, a Lebanese American doctor who wrote A History of Sulu in 1908 and other studies of the Moros, dismisses this claim by concluding that Jamiyun Kulisa and Indra Suga were mythical names.[33] According to tarsila, during the coming of Tuan Mashā′ikha, the people of Maimbung worshipped tombs and stones of any kind. After he preached Islam in the area, he married Sipad the Younger's daughter, Idda Indira Suga, who bore three children:[34] Tuan Hakim, Tuan Pam and 'Aisha. Tuan Hakim, in turn, begot five children.[35] From the genealogy of Tuan Mashā′ikha, another titular system of aristocracy called "tuanship" started in Sulu. Apart from the Idda Indira Suga, Tuan Mashā′ikha also married another "unidentified woman" and begot Moumin. Tuan Mashā′ikha died in 710 A.H. (equivalent to 1310 AD), and was buried in Bud Dato near Jolo, with an inscription of Tuan Maqbālū.[36]

A descendant of the Sunni Sufi Shaykh Tuan Mashā′ikha named Tuan May also begot a son named Datu Tka. The descendants of Tuan May did not assume the title of tuan, but instead, used datu. This was the first time datu was used as a political institution.[34][37] During the coming of Tuan Mashā′ikha, the Tagimaha people (literally means "the party of the people") from Basilan and several places in Mindanao, also arrived and settled in Buansa. After the Tagimaha came the Baklaya people, (which means "seashore dwellers"), who are believed to have originated from Sulawesi, and settled in Patikul. After these came the Bajau people (or Samal) from Johor. The Bajau were driven towards Sulu by a heavy monsoon, some of them to the shores of Brunei and others to Mindanao.[38] The population of Buranun, Tagimaha, and Baklaya in Sulu created three parties with distinct systems of government and subjects. In the 1300s the Chinese annals, Nanhai zhi, reported that Brunei invaded or administered the Philippine kingdoms of Butuan, Sulu and Ma-i (Mindoro), which did not regain their independence until later date.[39] According to the Nagarakretagama, the Majapahit Empire under Emperor Hayam Wuruk invaded Sulu in 1365. However in 1369, the Sulus rebelled and regained independence and in vengeance assaulted the Majapahit Empire and its province Po-ni (Brunei), as well as the northeast coast of Borneo[40] and thereafter went to the capital, looting it of treasure and gold. In the sacking of Brunei, the Sulus stole two sacred pearls from the Bruneian king.[41] A fleet from the Majapahit capital succeeded in driving away the Sulus, but Po-ni was left weaker after the attack.[42] Since Chinese historiographies later recorded there to be a Maharaja of Sulu, it is assumed that the Majapahit did not take it back, and it was a rival to it. By 1390 CE, Rajah Baguinda Ali, a prince of the Pagaruyung Kingdom, arrived at Sulu and married into the local nobility. At least in 1417, when Sulu rivaled Majapahit according to Chinese annals, three kings (or monarchs) ruled three civilised kingdoms in the island.[43] Patuka Pahala (Paduka Batara) ruled the eastern kingdom (Sulu Archipelago) -- he was the most powerful; the western kingdom was ruled by Mahalachi (Maharajah Kamal ud-Din), ruler of Kalimantan in Indonesia; and the kingdom near the cave (or Cave King) was Paduka Patulapok from Palawan Island.[44] The Bajau settlers were distributed among the three kingdoms. During this time, Sulu avenged itself for Majapahit Imperialism by encroaching upon the Majapahit Empire as the alliance of the three Sulu kings had territory that reached East and North Kalimantan, which were former Majapahit provinces.[45]

Moumin's descendants the son of Tuan Mashā′ikha populated Sulu.[clarification needed] After some time, a certain Timway Orangkaya Su'il was mentioned by the second page of tarsila; he received four Bisaya slaves (people from the Kedatuan of Madja-as) from Manila (presumably Kingdom of Maynila) as a sign of friendship between the two countries. The descendants of Su'il also inherited the title Timway, which means "chief". On tarsila's third page, it accounts the fact that the slaves were the ancestors of the inhabitants in the island to Parang, Lati, Gi'tung, and Lu'uk respectively.

The fourth page then narrates the coming of the Buranun (addressed in the tarsila as "the Maimbung people"), Tagimaha, Baklaya, and finally the drifted Bajau immigrants from Johor.[46] The condition of Sulu before the arrival of Islam can be summarised as such: The island was inhabited by several cultures, and was reigned over by three independent kingdoms ruled by the Buranun, Tagimaha, and Baklaya peoples. Likewise, the socio-political systems of these kingdoms were characterised by several distinct institutions: rajahship, datuship, tuanship and timwayship. The arrival of Tuan Mashā′ikha afterwards established a core Islamic community in the island.

Islamisation and establishment

[edit]
See also: Islam in the Philippines
Main article: List of Sultans of Sulu

The Sulu Archipelago was an entrepôt that attracted merchants from south China and various parts of Southeast Asia beginning in the 14th century.[47] The name "Sulu" is attested in Chinese historical records as early as 1349,[48] during the late Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), suggesting trade relations around this time.[49] Trade continued into the early Ming dynasty (1368–1644); envoys were sent in several missions to China to trade and pay tribute to the emperor. Sulu merchants often exchanged goods with Chinese Muslims, and also traded with Muslims of Arab, Persian, Malay, or Indian descent.[47] Islamic historian Cesar Adib Majul argues that Islam was introduced to the Sulu Archipelago in the late 14th century by Chinese and Arab merchants and missionaries from Ming China.[48][49] The seven Arab missionaries were called "Lumpang Basih" by the Tausug, and were Sunni Sufi scholars from the Ba 'Alawi sada of Yemen.[50]

Around this time, a notable Arab judge, Sunni Sufi and religious scholar Karim ul-Makhdum[note 5] from Mecca arrived in Malacca. He preached Islam, particularly the Ash'ari Aqeeda and Shafi'i Madh'hab as well as the Qadiriyya Tariqa, and many citizens, including the ruler of Malacca, converted to Islam.[51] Sulu leader Paduka Pahala and his sons moved to China, where he died. Chinese Muslims brought up his sons in Dezhou, where their descendants live and have the surnames An and Wen. In 1380 CE,[note 6] Karim ul-Makhdum arrived in Simunul island from Malacca, again with Arab traders. Apart from being a scholar, he operated as a trader; some see him as a Sufi missionary from Mecca.[52] He preached Islam, and was accepted by the core Muslim community. He was the second person to preach Islam in the area, after Tuan Mashā′ikha. To facilitate conversion of nonbelievers, he established a mosque in Tubig-Indagan, Simunul, the first Islamic temple to be constructed in the area, or in the Philippines. This later became known as the Sheik Karimal Makdum Mosque.[53] He died in Sulu, although the exact location of his grave is unknown. In Buansa, he was known as Tuan Sharif Awliyā.[23] On his alleged grave in Bud Agad, Jolo, an inscription reads "Mohadum Aminullah Al-Nikad". In Lugus, he is referred to as Abdurrahman. In Sibutu, he is known by his name.[54]

The differing beliefs about his grave's location came about because the Qadiri Shaykh Karim ul-Makhdum travelled to several islands in the Sulu Sea to preach Islam. In many places in the archipelago, he was beloved. It is said that the people of Tapul built a mosque honouring him and that they claim descent from Karim ul-Makhdum. The customs, beliefs and political laws of the people changed and adapted to adopt the Islamic tradition.[55]

Sulu abruptly stopped sending tributes to the Ming in 1424.[49] Antonio Pigafetta recorded in his journals that the sultan of Brunei invaded Sulu to retrieve the two sacred pearls Sulu had previously pillaged from Brunei.[56] A sultan of Brunei, Sultan Bolkiah married a princess (dayang-dayang) of Sulu, Puteri Laila Menchanai, and they became the grandparents of the Muslim prince of Maynila, Rajah Matanda. Manila was a Muslim city-state and vassal to Brunei before the Spanish colonized it and converted it from Islam to Christianity.[citation needed] Islamic Manila ended after the failed attack of Tarik Sulayman, a Muslim Kapampangan commander, in the failure of the Conspiracy of the Maharlikas, when the formerly Muslim Manila nobility attempted a secret alliance with the Japanese shogunate and Bruneiean sultanate (together with her Manila and Sulu allies) to expel the Spaniards from the Philippines.[57] Many Tausugs and other native Muslims of Sulu Sultanate already interacted with Kapampangan and Tagalog Muslims called Luzones based in Brunei, and there were intermarriages between them. The Spanish had native allies against the former Muslims they conquered like Hindu Tondo which resisted Islam when Brunei invaded and established Manila as a Muslim city-state to supplant Hindu Tondo.

Maritime power

[edit]
Main article: Piracy in the Sulu Sea
An Iranun pirate.

The Sulu sultanate became notorious for its so-called "Moro Raids" or acts of piracy on Spanish settlements in the Visayan areas with the aim of capturing slaves and other goods from these coastal towns. Tausug pirates used boats known collectively by Europeans as proas (predominantly the lanong and garay warships), which varied in design and were much lighter than the Spanish galleons and could easily out-sail these ships, and also often carried large swivel guns or lantaka and also carried a crew of pirates from different ethnic groups throughout Sulu, such as the Iranun, Bajaus and Tausugs alike. By the 18th century, Sulu pirates had become virtual masters of the Sulu seas and the surrounding areas, wreaking havoc on Spanish settlements.[58] This prompted the Spaniards to build a number of fortifications[59] across the Visayan islands of Cebu and Bohol; churches were built on higher ground, and watchtowers were built along coastlines to warn of impending raids.

The maritime supremacy of Sulu was not directly controlled by the sultan; independent datus and warlords waged their own wars against the Spaniards and even with the capture of Jolo on numerous occasions by the Spaniards, other settlements like Maimbung, Banguingui and Tawi-Tawi were used as assembly areas and hideouts for pirates.

The sultanate's control over the Sulu seas was at its height around the late 17th to early 18th centuries when Moro raids became very common for the Visayans and Spaniards.

In Sulu and in the Mindanao interior, the slave trade flourished and majority of the slaves that were being imported and exported were of Visayan ethnicity; the term Bisaya eventually became synonymous to "slave" in these areas. Its maritime supremacy over the Spaniards, at the time, the Spaniards acquired steam-powered ships that began to curb Muslim piracy in the region, the Moro piratical raids began to decrease in number until Governor Narciso Clavería launched the Balanguingui expedition in 1848 to crush the pirate settlements there, effectively ending the Moro pirate raids. By the last quarter of the 19th century, Moro pirates had virtually disappeared and the maritime influence of the sultanate became dependent on the Chinese junk trade.

Spanish and British annexations

[edit]
Concession of Sabah
The first concession treaty was signed by Sultan Abdul Momin of Brunei on 29 December 1877, appointing Baron de Overbeck as the Maharaja Sabah, Rajah Gaya and Sandakan[60]
The second concession treaty was signed by Sultan Jamal ul-Azam of Sulu on 22 January 1878 also appointing Baron de Overbeck as Dato Bendahara and Raja Sandakan[61]

In the 18th century, Sulu's dominion covered most of northeastern part of Borneo. However areas like Tempasuk and Abai had never really shown much allegiance to its earlier ruler, Brunei, subsequently similar treatment was given to Sulu. Alexander Dalrymple, who made a treaty of allegiance in 1761 with Sulu, had to make a similar agreement with the rulers of Tempasuk and Abai on the north Borneo coast in 1762.[62] The Sultanate of Sulu totally gave up its domain over Palawan to Spain in 1705 and Basilan to Spain in 1762. The territory ceded to Sulu by Brunei initially stretched south to Tapean Durian (now Tanjong Mangkalihat) (another source mentioned a southernmost boundary at Dumaring),[63] near the Straits of Macassar (now Kalimantan). From 1726 to 1733, the Sulu sultanate restarted their tributary relationship with China, now the Qing Empire, about 300 years after it had ended.[64]

By 1800–1850, the areas gained from Brunei had been effectively controlled by the Sultanate of Bulungan in Kalimantan, reducing the boundary of Sulu to a cape named Batu Tinagat and the Tawau River.[65]

1879 photo of Sultan Jamal ul-Azam, Sultan of Sulu from 1862 to 1881

In 1848 and 1851, the Spanish launched attacks on Balanguingui and Jolo respectively. A peace treaty was signed on 30 April 1851[67] in which the sultan could only regain the capital if Sulu and its dependencies became a part of the Philippine Islands under the sovereignty of Spain. There were different understandings of this treaty; although the Spanish interpreted it as the sultan accepting Spanish sovereignty over Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, but the sultan took it as a friendly treaty amongst equals. These areas were only partially controlled by the Spanish, and their power was limited to military stations and garrisons and pockets of civilian settlements. This lasted until they had to abandon the region as a consequence of their defeat in the Spanish–American War. On 22 January 1878, an agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and British commercial syndicate of (Alfred Dent and Baron de Overbeck), which stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used) to the British in return for payment of five thousand Malayan dollars per year.[68][69]

On 22 April 1903, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II signed a document known as "Confirmation of cession of certain islands", in which he granted and ceded additional islands in the neighbourhood of the mainland of North Borneo from Banggi Island to Sibuku Bay to the British North Borneo Company. The confirmatory deed of 1903 makes it known and understood between the two parties that the islands mentioned were included in the cession of the districts and islands mentioned on 22 January 1878 agreement. Additional cession money was set at 300 dollars a year with arrears due for past occupation of 3,200 dollars. The originally agreed 5,000 dollars increased to 5,300 dollars per year payable annually.[71][72][73][note 7]

Madrid Protocol

[edit]
Sultan Jamalul Kiram II with William Howard Taft of the Philippine Commission in Jolo, Sulu (27 March 1901)

The Sulu sultanate later came under the control of Spain in Manila. In 1885, Great Britain, Germany, and Spain signed the Madrid Protocol to cement Spanish influence over the islands of the Philippines. In the same agreement, Spain relinquished all claim to North Borneo which had belonged to the sultanate in the past to the British government.[74]

The Spanish Government renounces, as far as regards the British Government, all claims of sovereignty over the territories of the continent of Borneo, which belong, or which have belonged in the past to the Sultan of Sulu (Jolo), and which comprise the neighbouring islands of Balambangan, Banguey, and Malawali, as well as all those comprised within a zone of three maritime leagues from the coast, and which form part of the territories administered by the Company styled the "British North Borneo Company".

— Article III, Madrid Protocol of 1885

Decline

[edit]
Main articles: Moro Rebellion, Battle of Bayan, First Battle of Bud Dajo, Second Battle of Bud Dajo, Battle of Bud Bagsak, and Kiram-Bates Treaty
Datu Amil (sitting left), an influential leader of the Tausūgs in discussion with Captain W.O. Reed, US 6th Cavalry Regiment during the American Moro Campaigns. Amil was later killed by the Americans which marking the starting end of the sovereignty of the Sulu Sultanate when the Americans relinquished their powers until the end of the last battle with the Moros in which their region fell under the American rules.[75][76]
Darul Jambangan (Palace of Flowers) in Maimbung, Sulu before it was destroyed by a typhoon in 1932. It used to be the largest royal palace built in the Philippines. A campaign to faithfully re-establish it in Maimbung town has been ongoing since 1933. A very small replica of the palace was made in a nearby town in the 2010s, but it was noted that the replica does not mean that the campaign to reconstruct the palace in Maimbung has stopped as the replica does not manifest the true essence of a Sulu royal palace. In 2013, Maimbung was officially designated as the royal capital of the Sultanate of Sulu by the remaining members of the Sulu royal family. Almost all Sulu royals who have died since the 19th century up to the present have been buried around the palace grounds.[77][78][79][80]

The sultanate's political power was relinquished in March 1915 after American commanders negotiated with Sultan Jamalul Kiram II on behalf of Governor-General Francis Burton Harrison. An agreement was subsequently signed, called the "Carpenter Agreement". By this agreement, the sultan relinquished all political power over territory within the Philippines (except for certain specific land granted to Sultan Jamalul Kiram II and his heirs), with the religious authority as head of Islam in Sulu.[20][81]

Legacy

[edit]

Status within the Philippines

[edit]

In 1962, the Philippine government under the administration of President Diosdado Macapagal officially recognised the continued existence of the Sultanate of Sulu.[82] It has been asserted that Macapagal was a cousin of the Sulu sultan due to his royal descent tracing to Lakandula of Tondo,[83][unreliable source?][84][85] Lakandula was the uncle of the Muslim king of Manila, Rajah Sulayman,[83] and they had a grandmother from Sulu in the person of the Tausug princess, Laila Mechanai, wife of Sultan Bolkiah of Brunei and ancestor of Rajah Matanda and Rajah Sulayman of Manila.[83] On 24 May 1974, the reign of Sultan Mohammed Mahakuttah Kiram began and lasted until 1986. He was the last officially recognized Sulu sultan in the Philippines, having been recognized by President Ferdinand Marcos.

Pretenders

[edit]

After the death of Mahakuttah A. Kiram, the Philippine national government did not formally recognised a new sultan. Mahakutta's crown prince Muedzul Lail Kiram, the heir to the throne according to the line of succession as recognised by the Philippine governments from 1915 to 1986, was 20 years old upon his father's death.[86] Due to his young age, he failed to claim the throne in a time of political instability in the Philippines that led to the peaceful revolution and subsequent removal of President Marcos. The gap in the sultanate leadership was filled by claimants of rival branches.

Therefore, the succeeding claimants to the Sultanship were not crowned with the support of the Philippine government nor received formal recognition from the national government as their predecessors had until 1974, when Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram was formally recognised as the legitimate successor as the 35th sultan of Sulu by Memorandum Order 427, signed by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos.[21][87] The then-Acting Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines officially further recognized the sovereignty of the Sultanate of Sulu over North Borneo (now Sabah), clarifying that "for the last two hundred years or more the title of sovereignty and dominion over the Territory of North Borneo has been vested in the Sultanate of Sulu."[88]

North Borneo dispute

[edit]
Main article: North Borneo dispute
W. C. Cowie, managing director of BNBC with the sultan of Sulu.

The dispute is based on a territorial claim by the Philippines since the era of President Diosdado Macapagal over much of the eastern part of Sabah in Malaysia. Sabah was known as North Borneo prior to the formation of the Malaysian federation in 1963. The Eastern Sabah territory was allegedly gifted by the Brunei Sultanate to the Sulu Sultanate due to Sulu intervention in the Brunei Civil War. However Brunei historian Leigh R. Wright has claimed that Sulu never really provided assistance during the civil war.[89][90] The Philippines, via the heritage of the Sultanate of Sulu, claim Sabah on the basis that Sabah was only leased to the British North Borneo Company with the sultanate's sovereignty never being relinquished. The dispute stems from the difference in the interpretation used on an agreement signed between Sultanate of Sulu and the British commercial syndicate (Alfred Dent and Baron von Overbeck) in 1878, which stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used) to the British chartered company in return for payment of 5,000 dollars per year. Malaysia views the dispute as a "non-issue", as it not only considers the agreement in 1878 as one of cession, but it also deems that the residents had exercised their act of self-determination when they joined to form the Malaysian federation in 1963.[91][92] As reported by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the independence of North Borneo was brought about as the result of the expressed wish of the majority of the people of the territory as supported by the findings of the Cobbold Commission.[93]

Moreover, a later 1903 Confirmation of Cession agreement between the sultan of Sulu and the British government, has provided reaffirmation regarding the understanding of the sultan of Sulu on the treaty in 1878, i.e. it is of the form of a cession.[94][95] Throughout the British administration of North Borneo, the British government continued to make the annual "cession money" payment to the sultan and its heir and these payments were expressly shown in the receipts as "cession money".[96] In a 1961 conference in London, a Philippine and British panel met to discuss the Philippine claim to North Borneo, the British informed the Congressman Salonga that the wording of the receipts had not been challenged by the sultan or his heirs.[96] During a meeting of Maphilindo between the Philippine, Malayan and Indonesian governments in 1963, the Philippine government said the sultan of Sulu wanted the payment of 5,000 from the Malaysian government.[19] The first Malaysian Prime Minister at the time, Tunku Abdul Rahman said he would go back to Kuala Lumpur and get on the request.[19] Since then, the Malaysian Embassy in the Philippines issues a cheque in the amount of RM5,300 (approx. ₱77,000 or US$1,710) to the legal counsel of the heirs of the sultan of Sulu. Malaysia considers the settlement an annual "cession payment" for the disputed state, while the sultan's descendants consider it "rent".[97] These payments however have been stopped as of 2013 in light of the attempted invasion of Sabah since Malaysia viewed that as an act of violation of the 1903 Confirmation of Cession agreement and its earlier 1878 agreement.[98]

Republic Act 5446 in the Philippines, which took effect on 18 September 1968, regards Sabah as a territory "over which the Republic of the Philippines has acquired dominion and sovereignty".[99] On 16 July 2011, the Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled that the Philippine claim over Sabah is retained and may be pursued in the future.[100] As of 10 May 2018, Malaysia maintains that their Sabah claim is a non-issue and non-negotiable, thereby rejecting any calls from the Philippines to resolve the matter in the International Court of Justice. Sabah authorities sees the claim made by the Philippines' Moro leader Nur Misuari to take Sabah to International Court of Justice as a non-issue and thus dismissed the claim.[101]

In February 2022, an international court ruled that Malaysia had violated a treaty signed in 1878 of annual cession payment and would have to pay at least US$14.92 billion (RM62.59 billion) to the descendants of the Sulu sultan, which Malaysia ceased payment in 2013 as it deemed that the Sulu counterpart had first violated the treaty through the 2013 Sabah incursion. The award was reportedly issued in an arbitration court in Paris, France by Spanish arbitrator Gonzalo Stampa.[102] In March 2022, Malaysia filed an application to annul the final award over claims by Sulu sultan’s heirs since the appointment of Stampa had itself been annulled by Madrid High Court in June 2021, rendering any decisions by him to be invalid including the 2022 award.[103] Lawyers for the heirs indicated that they will seek the award’s recognition and execution, citing a 1958 U.N. Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.[104][105] In July 2022, court bailiffs in Luxembourg served Petronas Azerbaijan (Shah Denis) and Petronas South Caucus with a "saiseie-arret," or a size order or behalf of descendants of the Sulu sultan. Petronas said it would defend its legal position.[106]

In June 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the Malaysian Government's appeal against the French arbitration court's 2022 decision to award US$15 billion to the claimants to the Sultanate of Sulu. The Court of Appeal also ruled that Stampa and the arbitration tribunal did not have jurisdiction over the case. In addition, the Court of Appeal annulled the US$15.9 billion award. The decision was welcomed by Malaysian law minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman.[107][108][109] Stampa also faces legal proceedings in Spain for ignoring the decisions of earlier Spanish courts. However, Stampa's award remains enforceable outside of France due to a United Nations treaty on international arbitration. The Sulu claimants have also filed claims to seize Malaysian assets in the Netherlands and Luxembourg.[108]

On 27 June 2023, a Dutch court of appeal dismissed a bid by the claimants to the Sultanate to enforce the US$15 billion arbitration award against the Malaysian Government. While the Malaysian Government welcomed the court's ruling, the Sulu heirs' lawyer Paul Cohen expressed disappointment.[110] On 9 November 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal dismissed legal attempts by the Sultanate's claimants to seize Malaysian diplomatic properties in Paris.[111] On 10 November, the Madrid Court filed criminal charges against Stampa over his role in handing the US$14.92 billion arbitration award to the eight Sulu claimants.[112] On 5 January 2024, Stampa was convicted for contempt of court.[113] He was sentenced to six months in prison and banned from acting as an arbitrator for one year for “knowingly disobeying rulings and orders from the Madrid High Court of Justice”.[114] According to Law360, the Spanish courts’ decision to move ahead with criminal proceedings against Stampa marked a significant “victory for the Malaysian government”.[115]

On May 17, 2024 the Madrid Court of Appeal upheld the contempt of court conviction and sentence against Stampa, upholding his six-month prison sentence, and a one-year ban from practicing as an arbitrator.[116][117]

The Madrid Court highlighted that the arbitrator's appointment was a judicial decision made before the arbitration process. Consequently, once the nullification of the appointment was confirmed, all subsequent arbitral proceedings stemming from that appointment were rendered invalid, as if they had never occurred.[118]

Malaysian Minister Azalina Othman said, “In its judgment, the Madrid Court of Appeal confirms that Stampa knowingly and wilfully disobeyed the clear rulings and orders of the Madrid High Court of Justice resulting from the nullification of his appointment as arbitrator.”[117]

Later on May 30, 2024, Malaysian state-owned petroleum firm Petronas moved a Manhattan court to seek directions for litigation funding firm Therium and its parent company to turn over subpoenaed financial documents and communications.

Petronas’ Azerbaijani arm said it would sue the companies and their lawyers in Spain over losses from the seizure of assets in Luxembourg.[119]

Former Spanish Judge Josep Galvez — barrister at 4-5 Gray's Inn Square Chambers, which the lawyers of Sulu claimants Paul Cohen and Elisabeth Mason also associate with — said the Madrid Court’s ruling underscored the importance of rigorous compliance with procedural requirements and judicial orders under Spanish law, as failure to do so could invite severe penalties.[118] “The conviction of Stampa serves as a lesson for international arbitration practitioners, emphasizing the paramount importance of adhering to judicial orders in Spain,” he wrote.

On 3 October 2024, Malaysia's Federal Court upheld the death sentences of seven Filipino men involved in the 2013 Lahad Datu invasion, which had resulted in the deaths of nine Malaysian security personnel.[120] The ruling was seen as a step toward ensuring justice and strengthening national security in Malaysia.[121]

On November 7, 2024, the French Court of Cassation—the highest court in the French judicial system—annulled a $15 billion arbitration ruling against Malaysia.[122] This decision marked a significant legal victory for Malaysia and reinforced its sovereignty in a dispute with the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs.[122] The ruling highlighted irregularities in the arbitration process led by Gonzalo Stampa and raised concerns about practices such as forum shopping and unregulated litigation funding in European courts.[123] [124]

The French court’s decision was deemed a significant “win” for Malaysia that effectively marked the end of the Sulu case by several publications, including Law.com and Law360.[125][126]  Keith Ellison, former vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee and Minnesota attorney general, pointed out that the case highlighted the enormous scope for “corruption,” irresponsible profiteering, and foreign influence operations to subvert arbitration proceedings”.[127]

Following Malaysia's legal victory in the French Court, Paul Cohen argued that the ruling allows the Sulu heirs to lease Sabah to other nations, such as China and the Philippines. Cohen also suggested that accepting the French court's decision implies recognition of the Sulu Sultanate descendants' sovereignty over Sabah, which Malaysia disputes.[128] In response, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said dismissed Cohen's statements as baseless and reaffirmed Sabah’s status as part of Malaysia, citing historical and legal foundations such as the Cobbold Commission and the 1963 referendum.[129]

In early November 2024, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. signed the Philippine Maritime Zones Act and the Philippine Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act. [130]These laws reaffirmed the Philippines' maritime territories and rights to natural resources across the South China Sea, including Sabah, drawing strong criticism from Malaysia.[131] On November 15, 2024, Kuala Lampur lodged a diplomatic protest against the two maritime laws, arguing that they infringed upon Malaysia's territorial boundaries in the South China Sea.[132] [133]  [134]

  Territory in the 1878 agreement – From the Pandassan River on the north west coast to the Sibuco River in the south.[135]

Other

[edit]

Outside the North Borneo dispute, the heirs and claimants of the Sulu sultanate have been involved in contemporary Philippine politics such as the lobbying for the creation of a constituent state called Zambasulta within the Philippines under a federal form of government.[136]

Economy

[edit]

Weapons and slave trade

[edit]
A Moro brass lantaka or swivel gun.

Chinese who lived in Sulu ran guns across a Spanish blockade to supply the Moro datus and sultanates with weapons to fight the Spanish, who were engaging in a campaign to subjugate the Moro sultanates on Mindanao. A trade involving the Moros selling slaves and other goods in exchange for guns developed. The Chinese had entered the economy of the sultanate, taking almost total control of the sultanate's economies in Mindanao and dominating the markets. Though the sultans did not like one group of people exercising exclusive control over the economy, they did business with them.

19th century illustration of a lanong, the main warships used by the Iranun and Banguingui people of the navies of the sultanates of Sulu and Maguindanao for piracy and slave raids

The Chinese set up a trading network between Singapore, Zamboanga, Jolo and Sulu. The Chinese sold small arms like Enfield and Spencer Rifles to the Buayan Datu Uto. They were used to battle the Spanish invasion of Buayan. The datu paid for the weapons in slaves.[137] The population of Chinese in Mindanao in the 1880s was 1,000. The Chinese ran guns across a Spanish blockade to sell to Mindanao Moros. The purchases of these weapons were paid for by the Moros in slaves in addition to other goods. The main group of people selling guns were the Chinese in Sulu. The Chinese took control of the economy and used steamers to ship goods for exporting and importing. Opium, ivory, textiles, and crockery were among the other goods which the Chinese sold.

The Chinese on Maimbung sent the weapons to the Sulu sultanate, who used them to battle the Spanish and resist their attacks. A Chinese-Mestizo was one of the sultan's brothers-in-law, the sultan was married to his sister. He and the sultan both owned shares in the ship (named the Far East) which helped smuggle the weapons.[137] The Spanish launched a surprise offensive under Colonel Juan Arolas in April 1887 by attacking the sultanate's capital at Maimbung in an effort to crush resistance. Weapons were captured and the property of the Chinese were destroyed while the Chinese were deported to Jolo.[137]

Pearling industry

[edit]
A painting from 1880s depicting Sultan Jamal ul-Azam having a conversation with the French visitors.

After the destruction of the pirate haunts of Balanguingui effectively ending the centuries of slave raids, which the Sulu sultanate's economy had so depended on, along with the economy of mainland Mindanao, the sultanate's economy experienced a sharp decline as slaves became more inaccessible and the islands' agricultural produce wasn't enough, thus it became dependent on the Mindanao interior even for rice and produce.[138] Although the Spaniards thought they had dealt the death blow for the sultanate when they captured Jolo in 1876, rather, the sultanate's capital and economic and trading hub was moved to Maimbung on the other side of the island. Up until the American occupation, this was the residence and economic centre of Sulu. This is where the Sultan Jamalul Kiram II and his adviser Hadji Butu began the Sulu pearling industry to increase the sultan's wealth, they organised the Sulu pearling fleet, which remained active well into the early 20th century. In 1910, the sultan reportedly sold a giant pearl in London for $100,000.[citation needed]

Culture

[edit]

Social class system

[edit]

Among the people of the Sultanate of Sulu, nobility could be acquired only by lineage, a closed hereditary system.

Sulu vessel carrying pilgrims to Mecca, 1899.

There were two royal classes:[139]

  • Datu (susultanun), acquired purely by lineage. All male members of the royal house of Sulu held this title and style "His Royal Highness (HRH)". Their spouses automatically held the title of Dayangdayang (princess of the first degree). Adopted members of the royal house of Sulu were styled "His Highness (HH)" and their spouses also held the title of Dayangdayang and the style: "Her Highness".
  • Datu sadja, which may be acquired through confirming the titles (gullal) on the middleman of the sultan. The gullal is made if a commoner has achieved outstanding feats or services in line of duty through display of bravery, heroism, etc. Datu sadja is a life title of nobility and the title holders hold the style "His Excellency" and their spouses should hold the title of dayang the style "Her Excellency".

Maharlika, or commoners, do not trace their descent from royalty. The upper subclasses held administrative roles:

  • Wakil Kesultanan – regional representative outside the sultanate
  • Panglima – regional representative inside the sultanate
  • Parkasa – aide-de-camp of region representative inside the sultanate
  • Laksaman– subregional representative inside the sultanate

The males who hold the offices above were addressed by the title of nobility Tuan (the title is directly attached to the office), followed by the rank of the office they hold, their given name, surname and region. The females who held offices above shall be addressed by the title of nobility Sitti (the title is directly attached to the office), followed by the same name order.

A very large part of the Sulu society, as well as in the Sultanate of Maguindanao were slaves captured from slave raids or bought from slave markets. They were known as the bisaya, reflecting their most common origin – Christianized Visayans from Spanish territories in the Philippines – although they also included captured slaves from other ethnic groups throughout Southeast Asia. They were also known as banyaga, ipun, or ammas. It is estimated that as much as 50% of the population of Sulu in the 1850s were bisaya slaves and dominated the Sulu economy. For the most part, they were treated like commoners, with their own houses and were responsible for cultivating farms and fisheries of Tausug nobility. But there were harsh punishments for attempts to escape, and a large number of the slaves were sold to European, Chinese, Makassar, and Bugis slavers in the Dutch East Indies.[140][141]

Visual arts

[edit]
Main article: Okir
A kutiyapi (lute) from Mindanao bearing Ukkil motifs.

The Sultanate of Sulu, along with the rest of Mindanao, has a long tradition of decorative arts known as ukkil or okir. Ukkil is the Tausug word for "wood carving" or "engraving". The Tausug and Maranao peoples traditionally carved and decorated their boats, houses and even grave markers with ukkil carvings. Aside from wood carvings, ukkil motifs were found on various clothing in the Sulu archipelago. Ukkil motifs tend to emphasise geometric patterns and a flowing design, with floral and leaf patterns as well as folk elements. The Tausug also decorated their weapons with these motifs, and various kris and barong blades have finely decorated handles as well as blades covered in floral patterns and the like.[142] Bronze lantaka also bear some ukkil patterns.

[edit]

A yellow-colored flag was used in Sulu by the Chinese.[143]

  • Flag of the Sultanate of Sulu according to Pierre Sonnerat[144]
    Flag of the Sultanate of Sulu according to Pierre Sonnerat[144]
  • Merchant flag of the Chinese community in the Sultanate of Sulu
    Merchant flag of the Chinese community in the Sultanate of Sulu
  • A war flag of the Sultanate of Sulu at the end of the 19th century
    A war flag of the Sultanate of Sulu at the end of the 19th century
  • The official flag of the Sultanate of Sulu under the guidance of Ampun Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram of Sulu.
    The official flag of the Sultanate of Sulu under the guidance of Ampun Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram of Sulu.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ According to WH Scott that followed the Ash'ari aqeeda and Shafi'i Fiqh from their Ba 'Alawi sada ancestors. Even though the sultanate was ruled by Tausūg people, the subjects of the kingdom were a mix of Butuanon, Samal and Malays.[4]
  2. ^ The generally accepted date of the establishment of the sultanate by modern historians is 1457. However, the National Historical Commission of the Philippines list the date as "around 1450", or simply "1450s",[6] due to uncertainty. On the other hand, independent Muslim studies marked the day to a more exact date 17 November 1405 (24th of Jumada al-awwal, 808 AH).[7][8]
  3. ^ Mashā′ikha is an Arabic term which originated from mashā′ikh, which means "an intelligent or pious man".
  4. ^ The generally accepted date for the coming of Tuan Mashā′ikha is 1280 CE, however, other Muslim scholars dated his coming only as second half of the 13th century".[31]
  5. ^ Also Karimul Makhdum, Karimal Makdum or Makhdum Karim among others. Makhdum came from the Arabic word makhdūmīn, which means "master".
  6. ^ Another uncertain date in Philippine Islamic history is the year of arrival of Karim ul-Makhdum. Though other Muslim scholars place the date as simply "the end of 14th century", Saleeby calculated the year as 1380 AD corresponding to the description of the tarsilas, in which Karim ul-Makhdum's coming is ten years before Rajah Baguinda's. The 1380 reference originated from the event in Islamic history when a huge number of makhdūmīn started to travel to Southeast Asia from India. See Ibrahim's "Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia."
  7. ^ The Confirmatory Deed of 1903 must be viewed in the light of the 1878 Agreement. The British North Borneo Company entered into a Confirmatory Deed with the Sultanate of Sulu in 1903, thereby confirming and ratifying what was done in 1878.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Saleeby (1870–1935), Najeeb Mitry. "The History of Sulu". www.gutenberg.org.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ C, Josiah, Historical Timeline of The Royal Sultanate of Sulu Including Related Events of Neighboring Peoples, NIU, archived from the original on 29 April 2012, retrieved 21 December 2010.
  3. ^ "11 scams used by Filipinos before and during the Spanish Era". The Kahimyang Project. 5 November 2011.
  4. ^ Scott 1994, p. 177.
  5. ^ Abinales & Amoroso 2005, p. 44
  6. ^ Philippine Almanac & Handbook of Facts. 1977.
  7. ^ Usman, Edd (10 February 2010). "Heirs of Sulu Sultanate urged to attend general convention". Manila Bulletin. Archived from the original on 14 June 2012. Retrieved 21 December 2010.
  8. ^ Cavendish 2007, p. 1178.
  9. ^ Abdurahman, Habib Jamasali Sharief Rajah Bassal (2002). The Sultanate of Sulu: Their Dominion. University of Michigan: Astoria Print. & Publishing Company. p. 88. ISBN 9789719262701.
  10. ^ a b Julkarnain, Datu Albi Ahmad (30 April 2008). "Genealogy of Sultan Sharif Ul-Hashim of Sulu Sultanate". Zambo Times. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2010.
  11. ^ a b Ring, Trudy; Salkin, Robert M.; La Boda, Sharon (January 1996). International Dictionary of Historic Places: Asia and Oceania. Taylor & Francis. p. 160. ISBN 978-1-884964-04-6.
  12. ^ Brunei, Muzium (1969). Brunei Museum Journal. The area from Kimanis Bay to the Paitan River not from Sulu but from Brunei
  13. ^ Cahoon, Ben. "Sabah". worldstatesmen.org. Retrieved 9 October 2014. Sultan of Brunei cedes the lands east of Marudu Bay to the Sultanate of Sulu.
  14. ^ Keppel, p. 385
  15. ^ Campbell 2007, p. 53
  16. ^ Saunders, Graham (5 November 2013). A History of Brunei. Routledge. pp. 84–. ISBN 978-1-136-87394-2.
  17. ^ Kemp, Graham; Fry, Douglas P. (2004). Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies Around the World. Psychology Press. pp. 124–. ISBN 978-0-415-94761-9.
  18. ^ K. S. Nathan; Mohammad Hashim Kamali (January 2005). Islam in Southeast Asia: Political, Social and Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. pp. 52–. ISBN 978-981-230-282-3.
  19. ^ a b c "Why 'Sultan' is dreaming". Daily Express. 27 March 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
  20. ^ a b "Memorandum: Carpenter Agreement". Government of the Philippines. 22 March 1915. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  21. ^ a b "Memorandum Order No. 427, s. 1974". CDAsia. Government of the Philippines. 10 May 1974. Retrieved 2 October 2016.
  22. ^ Scott 1994, p. 164.
  23. ^ a b c Ibrahim 1985, p. 51
  24. ^ https://www.wattpad.com/5944709-history-of-the-philippines-chapter-3-our-early https://tekalong.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/chps-1-3.pdf Archived 5 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  25. ^ Scott, William (1984). Prehispanic Source Materials: For the Study of Philippine History (revised ed.). Quezon City: New Day Publishers. p. 66. ISBN 9711002264.
  26. ^ The Filipino Moving Onward 5' 2007 Ed. Rex Bookstore, Inc. pp. 3–. ISBN 978-971-23-4154-0.
  27. ^ Philippine History Module-based Learning I' 2002 Ed. Rex Bookstore, Inc. pp. 39–. ISBN 978-971-23-3449-8.
  28. ^ Philippine History. Rex Bookstore, Inc. 2004. pp. 46–. ISBN 978-971-23-3934-9.
  29. ^ Study Skills in English for a Changing World' 2001 Ed. Rex Bookstore, Inc. pp. 23–. ISBN 978-971-23-3225-8.
  30. ^ Tan 2010, p. 85
  31. ^ Larousse 2001, p. 39, footnote 51
  32. ^ Decasa 1999, p. 321
  33. ^ a b Saleeby 1908, p. 155
  34. ^ a b Tan 2010, p. 86
  35. ^ Saleeby 1908, p. 149
  36. ^ Ibrahim 1985, p. 54
  37. ^ Tan 2010, p. 88
  38. ^ Saleeby 1908, pp. 41–42
  39. ^ Ptak, Roderich (1998). "From Quanzhou to the Sulu Zone and beyond: Questions Related to the Early Fourteenth Century". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 29 (2): 280. doi:10.1017/S002246340000744X. JSTOR 20072046. S2CID 162707729.
  40. ^ Ming shi, 325, p. 8411, p. 8422.
  41. ^ Brunei Rediscovered: A Survey of Early Times By Robert Nicholl Page 12, citing: "Groenveldt, Notes Page 112"
  42. ^ History for Brunei Darussalam 2009, p. 44.
  43. ^ "Paduka Batara (d. 1417)" (PDF). National Historical Commission of the Philippines. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 November 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2010.
  44. ^ Tan 2010, p. 128
  45. ^ Reading Song-Ming Records on the Pre-colonial History of the Philippines By Wang Zhenping Page 258.
  46. ^ Saleeby 1908, pp. 152–153
  47. ^ a b Donoso 2022, p. 505
  48. ^ a b Abinales & Amoroso 2005, p. 43
  49. ^ a b c Gunn 2011, p. 93
  50. ^ Quiling, Mucha-Shim (2020). "Lumpang Basih". Journal of Studies on Traditional Knowledge in Sulu Archipelago and Its People, and in the Neighboring Nusantara. 3. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  51. ^ Saleeby 1908, pp. 158–159
  52. ^ Larousse 2001, p. 40
  53. ^ Mawallil, Amilbahar; Dayang Babylyn Kano Omar (3 July 2009). "Simunul Island, Dubbed As 'Dubai of the Philippines', Pursues Ambitious Project". The Mindanao Examiner. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 22 December 2010.
  54. ^ Gonda 1975, p. 91
  55. ^ Saleeby 1908, p. 159
  56. ^ Brunei Rediscovered: A Survey of Early Times By Robert Nicholl Page 45.
  57. ^ de Marquina, Esteban (1903). Blair, Emma Helen; Robertson, James Alexander (eds.). Conspiracy Against the Spaniards: Testimony in certain investigations made by Doctor Santiago de Vera, president of the Philipinas, May–July 1589. Vol. 7. Ohio, Cleveland: Arthur H. Clark Company. pp. 86–103. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  58. ^ Mallari, Francisco (March 1989). "Camarines Towns: Defenses Against Moro Pirates". Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society. 17 (1): 41–66. JSTOR 29791965.
  59. ^ Non, Domingo M. (4 March 1993). "Moro Piracy during the Spanish Period and Its Impact" (PDF). Kyoto University Repository. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
  60. ^ Yunos, Rozan (21 September 2008). "How Brunei lost its northern province". The Brunei Times. Archived from the original on 23 May 2014. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
  61. ^ Yunos, Rozan (7 March 2013). "Sabah and the Sulu claims". The Brunei Times. Archived from the original on 17 June 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2013.
  62. ^ Saunders 2002, p. 70
  63. ^ Majul 1973, p. 93
  64. ^ de Vienne, Marie-Sybille (2015). Brunei: From the Age of Commerce to the 21st Century. National University of Singapore Press. p. 73. ISBN 9789971698188.
  65. ^ United Nations Publications 2002, p. 638
  66. ^ Spain (1893). Colección de los tratados, convenios y documentos internacionales celebrados por nuestros gobiernos con los estados extranjeros desde el reinado de Doña Isabel II. hasta nuestros días. Acompañados de notas histórico-críticas sobre su negociación y cumplimiento y cotejados con los textos originales... (in Spanish). pp. 120–123.
  67. ^ see text of treaty (in Spanish),[66]
  68. ^ Ooi, Keat Gin (1 January 2004). Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor. ABC-CLIO. pp. 1163–. ISBN 978-1-57607-770-2.
  69. ^ International Court of Justice (2003). Summaries of Judgments, Advisory Opinions, and Orders of the International Court of Justice, 1997-2002. United Nations Publications. pp. 205–268. ISBN 978-92-1-133541-5.[permanent dead link‍]
  70. ^ British Government. "British North Borneo Treaties (British North Borneo, 1878)" (PDF). Sabah State Attorney-General's Chambers. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 September 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
  71. ^ Guenther Dahlhoff (June 2012). Bibliographic Set (2 Vol Set). International Court of Justice, Digest of Judgments and Advisory Opinions, Canon and Case Law 1946 – 2011. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. 1133–. ISBN 978-90-04-23062-0.
  72. ^ British Government (1903). "British North Borneo Treaties. (British North Borneo, 1903)" (PDF). Sabah State Government (State Attorney-General's Chambers). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 August 2017. Retrieved 18 August 2017.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  73. ^ Office of the President of the Philippines (2013). "CONFIRMATION by Sultan of Sulu of Cession of Certain Islands". Government of the Philippines. Retrieved 12 May 2014.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  74. ^ "British North Borneo Treaties (Protocol of 1885)" (PDF). Sabah State Attorney-General's Chambers. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
  75. ^ Hurley, Vic; Harris, Christopher L. (1 October 2010). Swish of the Kris, the Story of the Moros, Authorized and Enhanced Edition. Cerberus Books. pp. 228–. ISBN 978-0-615-38242-5.
  76. ^ Arnold, James R. (26 July 2011). The Moro War: How America Battled a Muslim Insurgency in the Philippine Jungle, 1902-1913. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 236–. ISBN 978-1-60819-365-3.
  77. ^ "Before his death, Kiram III tells family to continue fight to re-possess Sabah | Inquirer News". 20 October 2013.
  78. ^ "Sulu Sultan dies from kidney failure". The Manila Times. 20 September 2015.
  79. ^ Whaley, Floyd (21 September 2015). "Esmail Kiram II, Self-Proclaimed Sultan of Sulu, Dies at 75". The New York Times.
  80. ^ "Sulu Sultan Jamalul Kiram III dies". 20 October 2013.
  81. ^ Beyer, Otley (22 March 1915). "Memorandum Agreement between the Governor-General of the Philippine Islands and the Sultan of Sulu". Official Gazette. The Government of the Philippines.
  82. ^ "Concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Philippines that North Borneo belongs to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu and to the ultimate sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines, and authorizing the President to conduct negotiations for the restoration of such ownership and sovereign jurisdiction over said territory". Official Gazette. Government of the Philippines. 28 April 1950. Retrieved 2 October 2016.
  83. ^ a b c Genealogist, Filipino. "Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's Royal Descent and the Value of Genealogical Provenance".
  84. ^ Santiago, Luciano P. R. (1990). "The Houses of Lakandula, Matandá and Solimán (1571–1898): Genealogy and Group Identity". Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society. 18 (1): 39–73. JSTOR 29791998.
  85. ^ Blood Relationship between Cecile Licad and Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and their Bartolo roots by Louie Aldrin Lacson Bartolo
  86. ^ Backo, Aleksandar (2015). Sultanate of Sulu: Notes from the Past and Present Times (PDF). Belgrade, Serbia. p. 10. Retrieved 10 November 2019.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  87. ^ Fabunan, Sara Susanne D. "Sabah intrusion foiled". Manila Standard Today. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 24 February 2013.
  88. ^ "Acceptance by the Republic of the Philippines of the cession and transfer of the terriroty of North Borneo by His Highness, Sultan Mohammad Esmail Kiram, Sultan of Sulu, acting with the consent and approval of the Ruma Bechara, in council assembled, to the Republic of the Philippines". www.officialgazette.gov.ph. 25 April 1962.
  89. ^ Leigh R. Wright (1966). "Historical Notes on the North Borneo Dispute". The Journal of Asian Studies. 25 (3): 471–484. doi:10.2307/2052002. JSTOR 2052002. S2CID 154355668.
  90. ^ Geoffrey Marston (1967). "International Law and the Sabah Dispute: A Postscript" (PDF). Australian International Law Journal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 November 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
  91. ^ Sario, Ruben; Alipala, Julie S.; General, Ed (17 September 2008). "Sulu sultan's 'heirs' drop Sabah claim". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Archived from the original on 3 July 2013. Retrieved 26 October 2010.
  92. ^ Aning, Jerome (23 April 2009). "Sabah legislature refuses to tackle RP claim". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Archived from the original on 3 July 2013. Retrieved 27 February 2013.
  93. ^ II. Substantive International Law – Second Part,;1.TERRITORY OF STATES, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, 2012, archived from the original on 23 February 2013, retrieved 15 October 2012
  94. ^ Haller-Trost, R (1998). The Contested Maritime and Territorial Boundaries of Malaysia: An International Law Perspective. University of Michigan: Kluwer Law International. p. 155. ISBN 9789041196521.
  95. ^ R. Haller-Trost (1 January 1998). The Contested Maritime and Territorial Boundaries of Malaysia: An International Law Perspective. Kluwer Law International. ISBN 978-90-411-9652-1.
  96. ^ a b "Philippine Claim to North Borneo, Volume 2". Bureau of Printing. 1967. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  97. ^ "WHAT WENT BEFORE: Sultan of Sulu's 9 principal heirs". Philippine Daily Inquirer. 23 February 2013. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  98. ^ "Malaysia stopped paying cession money to Sulu Sultanate in 2013". New Straits Times. 23 July 2020. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
  99. ^ "An Act to Amend Section One of Republic Act Numbered Thirty Hundred and forty-six, Entitled "An Act to Define the Baselines of the Territorial Sea of the Philippines"". Retrieved 17 February 2013.
  100. ^ "G.R No. 187167". Supreme Court of the Philippines. 16 July 2011. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 17 February 2013.
  101. ^ "Call for ICJ arbitration dismissed". The Star. 29 May 2008. Archived from the original on 27 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2013.
  102. ^ Zulkaflee, Ikhwan (March 2022). "International Court Ruled That Malaysia Must Pay RM62 Billion To Sulu Sultan's Descendents". TRP. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  103. ^ "Malaysia files application to annul final award over claims by Sulu sultan's heirs". The Star. 18 March 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  104. ^ "An old sultanate, oil and $14.9 million ruling against Malaysia". La Prensa Latina. 17 March 2022.
  105. ^ "United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958)". newyorkconvention.org. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  106. ^ "Petronas subsidiaries seized as lawyers press $15bn claim on Malaysia". Financial Times. 12 July 2022. Archived from the original on 11 December 2022. Retrieved 14 July 2022.
  107. ^ Vanar, Muguntan; Monihuldin, Mahadhir (7 June 2023). "Sulu claimants' award thrown out by Paris Appeals Court". The Star. Archived from the original on 8 June 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  108. ^ a b Sipalan, Joseph (7 June 2023). "Malaysia hails 'decisive victory' over Sulu sultan's heirs after French court ruling". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 7 June 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  109. ^ "Malaysia hails 'victory' in row with Sulu sultan's Filipino heirs". Al Jazeera. 7 June 2023. Archived from the original on 8 June 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  110. ^ van den Berg, Stephanie; Latiff, Rosanna (27 June 2023). "Dutch court rules sultan's heirs cannot seize Malaysian assets". Reuters. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  111. ^ "Sulu case: French court ends so-called heirs' claims over Malaysia's diplomatic assets, says Azalina". The Star. 9 November 2023. Archived from the original on 10 November 2023. Retrieved 14 November 2023.
  112. ^ "Sulu case: Spanish arbitrator Stampa to face criminal charges in Madrid on Dec 11 - Azalina". New Straits Times. Bernama. 10 November 2023. Archived from the original on 12 November 2023. Retrieved 14 November 2023.
  113. ^ Castro2024-01-19T13:14:00+00:00, Bianca. "Arbitrator in $14.9bn case jailed following intervention by Malaysia". Law Gazette. Retrieved 29 January 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  114. ^ "Arbitrator's Guilty Verdict Puts UK Funder's Investment at Risk". news.bloomberglaw.com. Retrieved 29 January 2024.
  115. ^ "Arbitrator Who Issued $14.9B Award Against Malaysia Indicted - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 29 January 2024.
  116. ^ "MADRID COURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS SULU ARBITRATOR GONZALO STAMPA'S CONVICTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT". Ministry of Foreign Affairs Malaysia. 17 May 2024. Archived from the original on 28 May 2024. Retrieved 28 May 2024.
  117. ^ a b BERNAMA. "Sulu Case: Madrid Court of Appeal upholds Stampa's conviction, sentence". thesun.my. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
  118. ^ a b "Decoding Arbitral Disputes: Spanish Judicial Oversight - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
  119. ^ "Petronas units in Luxembourg seized again". Reuters.
  120. ^ "Federal Court Upholds Death Sentence For Seven Filipino Men In Lahad Datu 2013 Invasion".
  121. ^ "Azalina justifies death sentence for seven Sulu 'terrorists'; says penalty for local Lahad Datu 'traitors' to be known after French court ruling in Nov".
  122. ^ a b "Un Jugement historique inaugure une nouvelle ère de progrès pour les tribunaux européens". La Tribune (in French). 13 November 2024. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  123. ^ "French Supreme Court Rejects Enforcement of Jurisdictional Award". natlawreview.com. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  124. ^ "Malaysia Wins $15B Arbitration Case Against Sulu Heirs - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  125. ^ "Malaysia Wins $15B Arbitration Case Against Sulu Heirs - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  126. ^ "French High Court Rejects Sultanate 'Heirs' $15 Billion Claim Against Malaysia". Law.com International. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  127. ^ Bensoussan, David (1 October 2024). "L'impasse politique de la France sera le plus grand cadeau pour Poutine à ce jour". 42mag.fr (in French). Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  128. ^ "'Heirs' now free to lease Sabah to China, Philippines, says lawyer". news.nestia.com. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  129. ^ "Azalina to Sulu 'heirs': Go ahead and try 'leasing' Sabah to other countries". news.nestia.com. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  130. ^ "Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime laws that it says infringe on its territory". Yahoo News. 15 November 2024. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  131. ^ "Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime laws that it says infringe on its territory". Yahoo News. 15 November 2024. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  132. ^ "Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime zones laws for South China Sea". www.globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  133. ^ Punongbayan, Michael. "Malaysia protests new Philippines maritime laws". Philstar.com. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  134. ^ "Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime laws that it says infringe on its territory". Yahoo News. 15 November 2024. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  135. ^ British North Borneo company charter (page 4). OpenLibrary.org. 1878. Retrieved 16 March 2013.
  136. ^ "Federal State of 'ZamBaSulTa' pushed in Mindanao | Mindanao Examiner Regional Newspaper".
  137. ^ a b c James Francis Warren (2007). The Sulu Zone, 1768–1898: The Dynamics of External Trade, Slavery, and Ethnicity in the Transformation of a Southeast Asian Maritime State. NUS Press. pp. 129–. ISBN 978-9971-69-386-2.
  138. ^ Reynaldo Clemeña Ileto (2007). Magindanao, 1860–1888: The Career of Datu Utto of Buayan. Anvil Publishing, Inc. pp. 18–. ISBN 978-971-27-1585-3.
  139. ^ Bruno, Juanito A (1973). The Social World of the Tausug. p. 146.
  140. ^ James Francis Warren (2002). Iranun and Balangingi: Globalization, Maritime Raiding and the Birth of Ethnicity. NUS Press. pp. 53–56. ISBN 9789971692421.
  141. ^ Non, Domingo M. (1993). "Moro Piracy during the Spanish Period and its Impact" (PDF). Southeast Asian Studies. 30 (4): 401–419. doi:10.20495/tak.30.4_401.
  142. ^ Fernando-Amilbangsa, Ligaya (2005). Ukkil: Visual Arts of the Sulu Archipelago. Ateneo University Press. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-971-550-480-5.
  143. ^ paopadd. "THE CHINESE COMMUNITY IN SULU SULTANATE".[unreliable source?]
  144. ^ paopadd. "ROYAL PANJI".[unreliable source?]
General
[edit]

Media related to Sultanate of Sulu at Wikimedia Commons

6°03′07″N 121°00′07″E / 6.05194°N 121.00194°E / 6.05194; 121.00194

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sultanate_of_Sulu&oldid=1264773306#Pretenders"