Jump to content

Polish constitutional crisis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Politics of Poland
Government
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Elections
Political parties
Administrative divisions
Foreign relations
Related topics

The Polish constitutional crisis, also known as the Polish rule-of-law crisis, is a political conflict ongoing since 2015 in which the Polish government has been accused of failing to comply with European and Polish constitutional law. The 2015 elections resulted in the Law and Justice party (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS) winning control of both the presidency and the parliament. With this government trifecta (as a result of its participation in the United Right), PiS used its power to appoint judges to the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015, leading to the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The government of Poland continued to expand its hold on the judiciary resulting in the 2017 Supreme Court crisis, and the 2019 Polish judicial disciplinary panel law. These events allowed the legislature and executive of the Polish government to have de facto control over judges and their appointments.[1]

These moves have been condemned by the European Union which initiated an Article 7 process against Poland. The European Commission referred Poland to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), stating in 2017, "the executive and legislative branches have been systematically enabled to politically interfere in the composition, powers, administration and functioning of the judicial branch."[2] In 2019 and 2020, the ECJ ruled against Poland in Commission v Poland, ordering it to suspend several laws which interfere with the independence of the judiciary, but these rulings have been largely ignored in Poland.[3] The crisis briefly jeopardised the EU coronavirus budget which allowed funds to be made available to EU member states on the condition of "rule of law", a clause which both the Polish government and Hungarian government threatened to veto in 2020.[4]

Since the changes to the judiciary, a number of protests took place as a result of either the changes themselves, rulings by the new judiciary, or other legislative action deemed to break European or international human rights legislation. This includes the Black Protest and Women's Strike against restrictions to women's rights (especially with regards to abortion), the Polish Sejm Crisis against restrictions of press freedoms, and the 2020 LGBT protests in Poland against restrictions to LGBT rights,[5] and the 2023 Polish protests in response to the oppression committed by the government by these actions. These rulings and legislative actions with the corresponding protest action have exacerbated the crisis in Poland.

After the 2023 Polish parliamentary election, the installation of the Donald Tusk-led coalition government has started to reverse the PiS reforms. This is opposed by Andrzej Duda, who remains President of Poland.

Background

[edit]

Constitutional Tribunal

[edit]
Main article: Constitutional Tribunal (Poland)
List of TC judges by seniority in June 2015
No Judge [a] Nomination date End of term
1 Maria Gintowt-Jankowicz   6 November 2006 6 November 2015
2 Wojciech Hermeliński   6 November 2006 6 November 2015
3 Marek Kotlinowski   6 November 2006 6 November 2015
4 Zbigniew Cieślak   2 December 2006 2 December 2015
5 Teresa Liszcz   8 December 2006 8 December 2015
6 Mirosław Granat   27 April 2007 27 April 2016
7 Andrzej Rzepliński (President)   19 December 2007 19 December 2016
8 Stanisław Biernat (Vice-President)   26 June 2008 26 June 2017
9 Sławomira Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz   6 May 2010 6 May 2019
10 Stanisław Rymar   3 December 2010 3 December 2019
11 Piotr Tuleja   3 December 2010 3 December 2019
12 Marek Zubik   3 December 2010 3 December 2019
13 Małgorzata Pyziak-Szafnicka   5 January 2011 5 January 2020
14 Andrzej Wróbel   29 May 2011 29 May 2020
15 Leon Kieres   23 July 2012 23 July 2021
  Nominated by PiS or its coalition partners (2006-2007)
  Nominated by PO or its coalition partners (2007-2015)

The Constitutional Tribunal (TC) of Poland was founded in 1982 by the government of the Polish People's Republic. It oversees the actions of government, including legislative action, to ensure compliance with the Constitution of Poland. Judges are elected to the court by the Sejm and approved by the President. The court is made up of 15 judges who serve single nine-year terms and which point they are replaced through agreement of the Sejm and President.[7] In 2015, before the crisis, the court was made up of ten justices nominated by the centre-right Civic Platform (PO) and five justices nominated by the right-wing nationalist Law and Justice Party (PiS).

Abortion law in Poland

[edit]
Main article: Abortion in Poland

In Poland it was illegal[when?] to have an abortion except where the mother's life was at risk, the pregnancy was a result of rape or if the foetus had "severe and irreparable" impairment. The largely Christian conservative base of PiS follow the Catholic Church teaching on abortion. In 2017, a Pew Research Center poll showed 51% of Poles thought abortion should be illegal in all or most cases.[8]

2015 Polish presidential election

[edit]
2015 Polish presidential election
Andrzej Duda
Andrzej Duda, Law and Justice (PiS)
Bronisław Komorowski
Bronisław Komorowski, endorsed by Civic Platform (PO)

In May 2015 Andrzej Duda was elected as President of Poland with a radical right-wing platform, defeating incumbent Bronisław Komorowski of the Civic Platform. Prior to the election, Komorowski was believed to be the favourite to win.[9] Duda promised to block the Constitutional Tribunal nominations of the Civic Platform-controlled Sejm until after the 2015 Polish parliamentary election. The outcome has been described as a shock in many media, as observers feared a potential conflict between Poland and the European Union as well as Duda's authoritarian tendency.[10][11]

European migrant crisis

[edit]

Following the election of Duda, relations between the European Union and Poland soured, especially in relation to the ongoing European migrant crisis, where Duda refused to be part of the European migrant quota plan managed by the European Asylum Support Office, causing the EU to initiate sanctions procedures against Poland and other Visegrád Group member states.[12][13][14]

First Duda term

[edit]

2015 Constitutional Court crisis

[edit]
Main article: 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis
The Constitutional Court building
The Constitutional Court in Warsaw
Protestors in Warsaw waving Polish and European flags
Protests against the appointment of new judges to the Constitutional Tribunal at rally organised by the Committee for the Defence of Democracy
Protestors in Warsaw waving Polish flags
Protestors for the changes to the Constitutional Tribunal at a Law and Justice rally

Between the election of Duda and the start of the 8th Sejm on 12 November 2015, 5 seats on the TC were due to expire. The 7th Sejm, controlled by PO and its allies completed its election process for replacement judges. However, Duda refused to swear in these nominees until after the sitting of the 8th Sejm.[15] Following the 2015 Polish parliamentary election in October 2015, PiS took control of the Sejm and elected its own five replacement judges, who were elected on 2 December and sworn in on 3 December by Duda.[16] PO claimed this was unlawful,[16] whereas PiS claimed that the initial election of judges by 7th Sejm was unlawful. On 3 December the TC ruled that 3 of the judges nominated by the 7th Sejm were legally elected; 2 were not. Despite the ruling, Duda did not swear in the legally elected judges.[17] The President of the Constitutional Tribunal dictated that the new five judges should not hear cases until the situation was settled; in order to combat this, PiS passed a series of laws through the Sejm and Senate which compelled the TC to allow the judges to hear new cases. The new legislation was signed into law on 28 December. In January 2016, the TC ruled the five new judges elected by the 8th Sejm were legally appointed, but in March 2016 ruled the new legislation unconstitutional. The latter ruling was ignored by the Polish government, which considered the ruling "advisory".[18][19] The crisis provoked outrage in the European Union which began an investigation into Poland under Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, describing the situation as threatening the rule-of-law.[20][21] Protests both for and against the government of Poland occurred in Warsaw and other major Polish cities.[19]

On 13 January 2016, the European Commission launched a formal rule-of-law assessment to determine a serious threat of a breach of Union law based on rules set out in 2014 and the provisions of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, regarding the amendments of the constitutional court and the public media law in Poland. A recommendation, the second step in the rule-of-law assessment, was issued on 1 June 2016.[22][23] Iverna McGowan, director of Amnesty International's European Institutes office in Brussels, commented: "The willingness of the commission to use the rule-of-law framework is a positive step towards a more serious approach by the EU to speak out and hold its own member states to account on their human rights records."[24] Hungary declared that it will oppose any sanctions against Poland.[25]

On 11 March 2016 the Council of Europe's Venice Commission, who had been asked for an opinion by the Polish government in December 2015, assessed the amendments as crippling the Court's effectiveness and undermining democracy, human rights and the rule of law.[26] On 13 April 2016 the European Parliament, by 513 votes to 142 and with 30 abstentions, passed a resolution declaring that the Parliament "is seriously concerned that the effective paralysis of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland endangers democracy, human rights and the rule of law".[27]

In July 2016, the European Commission issued a statement outlining its recommendations regarding "the rule of law in Poland", including the swearing-in of the three judges elected by the 7th Sejm and the adherence to the March 2016 TC ruling declaring that changes to the structure and functioning of the TC were unconstitutional.[20][28]

2016 protests

[edit]

Sejm Crisis

[edit]
Main article: December 2016 Polish protests
Opposition MPs in the Polish parliament holding placards and protesting
Opposition MPs protesting against limits on press freedom

In 2016, the government passed legislation which only allowed a small number of journalists and TV stations to report from parliament. This was seen as a continuation of PiS anti-journalistic policy, and resulted in protests. Inside the parliament building, opposition MPs staged a sit-in, forcing government legislators to pass bills elsewhere, and protestors outside the building gathered, shouting "freedom, equality, democracy".[29]

Black Protest

[edit]
Further information: Abortion in Poland § Black Protest

The 8th Sejm held debates on reforming abortion law in Poland, in order to make them more restrictive. The votes on the new restrictive abortion legislation took place on 6 October and were voted down due to domestic and international pressure. Despite a lack of legislative changes, PiS MPs began ligation in order to see abortion become more restrictive.

2017 Supreme Court crisis

[edit]
See also: Supreme Court of Poland

In 2017 the Sejm and Senate passed a law mandating retirement for all judges aged over 70, unless given an exemption by the Minister of Justice. Following widespread protests this law was vetoed by Duda. A revised bill, mandating retirement at aged 65 was eventually passed and signed by Duda, giving significant control to the government over judges and their livelihoods.[30][31]

In December 2017 the European Commission warned that "over a period of two years the Polish authorities have adopted more than 13 laws affecting the entire structure of the justice system in Poland", stating that "Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union provides for the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members, to determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the common values referred to in Article 2 of the Treaty... The Commission can trigger this process by a reasoned proposal."[2] In December 2018, a new law was signed by Duda, reinstating all judges who had been removed from their posts by the 2017 law — despite this, concerns in the European Union remained.[32] In April 2020, the ECJ ruled that Poland had still "failed to fulfil its obligations" under the Treaties of the European Union.[31][33]

Deforestation

[edit]
A fallen tree covered in moss
A fallen tree in Białowieża Forest

Białowieża Forest, an ancient woodland and World Heritage Site, has been subjected to large-scale logging since 2017.[34] 190,000 cubic metres (160,000-180,000 trees) of wood were felled in 2017 alone.[35][36] The European Commission sued Poland at the European Court of Justice, which ruled that logging must be immediately halted as Poland had failed to fulfil its obligations under the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive,[37][38][39] and threatened to fine the Polish state.[40] UNESCO also requested that the Polish government halt logging in the area.[41] Despite this, the Polish government has continued to allow logging in Białowieża Forest, although at "lower intensity" according to Greenpeace Poland,[42] under the pretext of a bark beetle infestation, a pretext which has been twice rejected by the ECJ.[38][43] However, several years later it turns out that the bark beetle infestation got out of control, causing many more trees to die than would have been necessary, if the infestation had been controlled, by removing all infested and dead trees. Additionally, bordering private forests were lost to the infestation. The owners sued the government for not containing the infestation in time, claiming that the damage could have been prevented, had the expertise of their rangers and forest officials not been overruled by activists and foreign political entities.[44]

LGBT-free zones

[edit]
Main article: LGBT-free zone
Illegally mounted street sign that created the confusion around the "LGBT Free Zones" and made the story go viral.

In 2019 and 2020, LGBT-free zones were declared across many local authorities in Poland, with over 100 municipalities voting to declare themselves "LGBT-free", meaning free of the popular ideology in their public education programs.[45] Whilst without legal backing, such declaration were found by the European Commissioner for Human Rights as "stigmatisation" which "directly impact" LGBT citizens, contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights and likely prohibited by Article 34 of Constitution of Poland.[46] The European Union broadly denounced these declarations, with the European Parliament voting overwhelming to condemn such declarations.[47] An LGBT activist placed "LGBT - Free Zone" road signs in front of the towns, creating the impression that they were officially placed by the towns and photographed them. These pictures were then used by media outlets all around the world.[48] The misleading presentation made the story go viral, so the young activist's success was recognized by a Obama foundation scholarship.[49] Polish opposition politicians, such as Robert Biedroń, have compared the declaration to the judenfrei zones created by the Nazis in Poland.[50] Due to the breach of Article 2 of the Maastricht Treaty, the European Union's Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund can no longer be used in these areas. However, the Polish government pledged to fill the gap in funding to affected areas, in opposition to the EU but supported by the Catholic Church.[51][52] President Ursula von der Leyen said "LGBTQI-free zones are humanity free zones. And they have no place in our Union" during her State of the Union speech in September 2020, indicating the strength of opposition in the European Union.[53]

2019 Judicial disciplinary panel law

[edit]
Main article: Polish judicial disciplinary panel law

On 20 December 2019 the Sejm voted to allow Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court of Poland to remove judges deemed to be partaking in "political activity". This gave the government de facto control of entire judicial arm of the state. The law also gave government greater control over appointment to the position of head judge of the Supreme Court of Poland. The law was criticised by the UN Human Rights Commission which stated the law "risks further undermining" the Polish judiciary.[54] The European Union also criticised the bill, with Poland risking further sanctions under Article 7 and by the European Court of Justice.[54] The EU urged Poland not to pass the bill, and to consult the Venice Commission, yet it passed.[55] The Association of Judges of Ireland condemned the Polish legislation.[56] Koen Lenaerts, President of the Court of Justice of the European Union, warned that "You can’t be a member of the European Union if you don’t have independent, impartial courts operating in accordance with fair trial rule, upholding union law".[57]

The Polish Supreme Court stated that the bill was a "continuation of the lawlessness of the 1980s". According to the court: "Everything is there: a ban on the freedom of speech by judges, the establishment of a surveillance mechanism and a drastic reduction of their right to have profiles on social networks".[58] The Polish Supreme Court, prior to the bill passing, said that Poland overruling the primacy of EU law may force it out of the bloc.[59][60]

Donald Tusk, former European Council president, warned the bill might force Poland out of the EU. Ombudsman Adam Bodnar said the law "violates the Constitution and the ground rules of the rule of law" and "would definitively put Polish courts and judges under the control of the legislative and executive branches of government". Special Rapporteur of the United Nations on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers Diego García Sayán and President of the European Association of Judges José Igreja Matos warned the legislation "runs contrary to judicial independence".[61]

A portrait photo of Adam Bodnar
Polish Ombudsman since 2015, Adam Bodnar is responsible for defending human rights in Poland and has criticised the Polish government throughout this crisis

COVID-19 reporting

[edit]
Further information: COVID-19 pandemic in Poland

On 20 March 2020, the secretary of state of the Ministry of Health, Józefa Szczurek-Żelazko, sent a written statement ordering voivodeship medical consultants to not make statements about SARS-CoV-2, the epidemiological situation, the risks for medical staff or methods of protection from infection, unless they had first consulted with the Ministry of Health or Główny Inspektorat Sanitarny [pl]. Szczurek-Żelazko motivated the order by the need to provide correct, unified information and to avoid unjustified unrest in the medical community.[62]

A surgeons group, Porozumienie Chirurgów SKALPEL, described the order as blackmail and said that it risked catastrophe. The group stated that the COVID-19 pandemic showed Poland as "not at all prepared for crisis situations" with a "lack of equipment, basic personal protective gear and disinfectant materials and a lack of standards and procedures".[63]

On 25 March 2020, the Polish Ombudsman Adam Bodnar sent a letter to the Minister of Health, Szumowski, stating that medical staff's freedom of speech and is guaranteed under Articles 2 and 54 of the Polish Constitution and the right of the public to information is guaranteed under Article 61 of the constitution. Bodnar stated that firing or punishing doctors for informing the public during the pandemic could be a violation of the "obligatory standards". Bodnar asked if Szumowski was aware of the situation and requested a clarification of policy.[64]

2019–20 elections

[edit]
2020 Polish presidential election
Andrzej Duda
Andrzej Duda, endorsed by Law and Justice (PiS)
Rafał Trzaskowski
Rafał Trzaskowski, Civic Platform (KO)

In 2019 and 2020 PiS and the United Right retained control of the parliament and presidency of Poland. In the 2019 Polish parliamentary election, which had the highest turnout since the fall of communism in Poland,[65] PiS retained 43.59% of the popular vote for the Sejm and 44.56% of the vote for the Senate,[66] marking a positive swing in these elections.

In 2020, the 2020 Polish presidential election took place, with Duda winning with 51.03% of the vote. Independent observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe found that Telewizja Polska, the Polish public broadcasting service, was inappropriately and "clearly biased" towards Duda and PiS in both elections.[67][68]

Second Duda term

[edit]

LGBT rights

[edit]
Main article: Rainbow Night
The Rainbow Madonna

In August 2020, following the arrest of Margot, an LGBT activist, several mass demonstrations took place across Poland. In central Warsaw, this protest degenerated and led to a violent police response, in turn resulting in further protest action. These protested against the "LGBT-free zones", police violence and human rights rollbacks by the government.[69][70][71] It has been described by some media outlets as "Poland's Stonewall".[70]

In January 2021, the trial of three Polish activists began, charged with offending religious feelings after creating and posting posters of the Black Madonna of Częstochowa with the rainbow flag, popularly known as the Rainbow Madonna.[72]

Abortion rights

[edit]
Main article: 2020–21 women's strike protests in Poland
A large crowd of protesters holding signs promoting women's rights in Polish
October 2020 protests against abortion restrictions in Kraków, Poland

On 22 October 2020, the Constitutional Tribunal, with disputed judges, ruled that abortion in cases of disability or life-limiting illness were unconstitutional, further limiting abortion rights in Poland. The decision was nearly unanimous, with judges ruling 11–2 in favour of limiting abortion. The court found it violated the right to human dignity enshrined in the Polish constitution.[73] This precipitated significant protests and civil unrest. Protests began on the day of the ruling, but have continued, especially in major cities such as Warsaw, which saw an estimated 100,000 people protest on 30 October.[74] Protests continued throughout November and December 2020. On 27 January 2021, the ruling was formally published in Dziennik Ustaw and enforcement of the ruling began across Poland, precipitating further waves of unrest. Poland now has one of the most restrictive abortion laws in Europe, described as a "near-total ban" by the BBC as 98% of previous abortions in Poland took place under the laws now deemed unconstitutional.[75]

Removal of PiS government

[edit]

In 2023, the Civic Coalition, a coalition led by Donald Tusk, won the 2023 Polish parliamentary election, and the Tusk government began a series of measures to roll back Duda's reforms and to restore the rule of law to Poland, opposed by Duda, who remained President.[76]

In January 2024, two convicted members of parliament were arrested in the Polish presidential palace, where Duda had given them refuge from serving their prison sentences.[76]

In March 2024, the Sejm voted on a motion that declared the 2015 nomination of several of the Constitutional Tribunal justices to have been illegally invalid. The motion stated the President of the Constitutional Tribunal, Julia Przyłębska, had been invalidly appointed, her de facto appointment to 21 December 2022 effectively terminated her de facto role as President of the tribunal, and all the procedural decisions made under her presidentship were open to legal challenge.[77]

Opposition groups

[edit]

Domestic

[edit]

Parliamentary parties

[edit]

Other

[edit]

International

[edit]

Role of the European Union

[edit]
See also: Poland in the European Union and Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation

Under European Union law, the European Court of Justice may strike down member state law if the laws are incompatible with Treaties of the European Union,[78] or if they concern one of the shared competences.[79] Examples of the former include judicial independence, human rights (including women's rights and LGBT rights) and freedom of the press. Thus, several times from 2016 to 2020, the European Commission referred to a lack of rule of law in Poland, as Union law was not being applied.[2][3][4][28] Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union allows the Union to suspend the rights of membership if a nation breaches the vaguely formulated Article 2, namely "respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities". This would be subject to a veto by any other member state, with Hungary indicating it would veto such action. Despite this, attempts were made to introduce sanctions or make funding conditional on the rule-of-law, such as in the Next Generation EU budget,[4] Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund.[51]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The colors only represent the majorities that elected each judge, as the Polish Constitution of 1997 mandates that judges shall be independent and shall not belong to any political party (Article 195).[6]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Poland". Freedom House. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  2. ^ a b c "Rule of Law: European Commission acts to defend judicial independence in Poland". European Commission. 20 December 2017. Archived from the original on 2024-07-17. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  3. ^ a b Morijn, John (2020-03-10). "Commission v Poland: What Happened, What it Means, What it Will Take". Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional. doi:10.17176/20200310-215105-0. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  4. ^ a b c "Rule of law fears remain in Poland despite EU compromise". The Guardian. 2020-12-11. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  5. ^ UKCLA (2020-11-12). "Atina Krajewska: The judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal on abortion: a dark day for Poland, for Europe, and for democracy". UK Constitutional Law Association. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  6. ^ "The Constitution of the Republic of Poland". Sejm.
  7. ^ "The Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland". Association of Constitutional Justice of the Countries of the Baltic and Black Sea Regions. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  8. ^ "Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe" (PDF). Pew Research Center. May 2015.
  9. ^ "Poland election: President Komorowski loses to rival Duda". BBC News. 2015-05-25. Retrieved 2020-11-24.
  10. ^ Cichowlas, Ola (22 May 2015). "Why Poland's presidential election may shake up the European Union". Reuters.
  11. ^ Foy, Henry (May 25, 2015). "Duda presidential victory stuns Poland". Financial Times.
  12. ^ "Poland's Duda Blasts EU 'Dictate of the Strong' on Migrants". Bloomberg.com. 2015-09-08. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  13. ^ "EU opens sanctions procedure against Hungary, Poland and Czech Republic over refugees". www.euractiv.com. 2017-06-13. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  14. ^ "Relocation and Resettlement – State of Play" (PDF). European Commission. 8 February 2017. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
  15. ^ Szczerbiak, Aleks (31 December 2015). "Who is winning Poland's 'constitutional tribunal war'?". The Polish Politics Blog.
  16. ^ a b Kisilowski, Maciej (2015-12-08). "Poland's 'overnight court' breaks all the rules". POLITICO. Retrieved 2016-03-30.
  17. ^ "President Duda won't implement constitutional tribunal ruling". Warsaw Business Journal. 8 December 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-01-05. Retrieved 2015-12-27.
  18. ^ Goettig, Marcin (22 December 2015). "Polish parliament passes contentious amendment to top court law". Reuters.
  19. ^ a b "Polish protests as government rejects court ruling". BBC News. 12 March 2016.
  20. ^ a b "Commission adopts Rule of Law Opinion on the situation in Poland". European Commission. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  21. ^ "Bruxelles lance une enquête préliminaire inédite sur la situation de l'Etat de droit en Pologne". Le Monde.fr (in French). 2016-01-13. ISSN 1950-6244. Retrieved 2016-12-04.
  22. ^ "Commission Opinion on the Rule of Law in Poland and the Rule of Law Framework: Questions & Answers" (Press release). European Commission. 1 June 2016.
  23. ^ "Poland gets official warning from EU over constitutional court changes". The Guardian. 1 June 2016.
  24. ^ "EU begins assessment of Poland over controversial new laws". The Irish Times. 13 January 2016.
  25. ^ dmilo, k (14 January 2016). "Błaszczak: żadne sankcje na Polskę nie zostaną nałożone".
  26. ^ "Venice Commission criticizes changes to top constitutional court". Warsaw Business Journal. 11 March 2016. Archived from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
  27. ^ "EU accuses Polish Government of undermining Democracy". The New York Times. 13 April 2016.
    "Poland court 'paralysis' threatens democracy". Reuters. 13 April 2016.
  28. ^ a b "Commission Opinion on the Rule of Law in Poland and the Rule of Law Framework: Questions & Answers". European Commission. 1 June 2016. Archived from the original on 2024-07-17. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  29. ^ "Poland protests: Crowds renew calls for press freedom". BBC News. 2016-12-18. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
  30. ^ "Poland: Draft Law Threatens Supreme Court". Human Rights Watch. 2017-07-20. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  31. ^ a b Brzozowski, Alexandra (2019-11-05). "Poland's 2017 judicial reform broke EU law, bloc's top court rules". www.euractiv.com. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  32. ^ Joanna Berendt; Marc Santora (December 17, 2018). "Poland Reverses Supreme Court Purge, Retreating From Conflict With E.U." The New York Times. Retrieved December 18, 2018.
  33. ^ Court of Justice of the European Union (8 April 2020). "Commission v Poland (Press Release)" (PDF). curia.europa.eu.
  34. ^ Davies, Christian (2017-05-23). "'My worst nightmares are coming true': last major primeval forest in Europe on 'brink of collapse'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  35. ^ "Białowieza: destructive logging in Polish Primeval Forest". European Data Journalism Network. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  36. ^ "Scars of the Primeval Forest – What Really Happened in the Oldest Forest of Europe". infografiki.wyborcza.pl. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  37. ^ "EU court orders Poland to stop logging in Białowieża forest". The Guardian. Reuters. 2017-07-28. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  38. ^ a b European Court of Justice (17 April 2018). "The forest management operations concerning the Puszcza Białowieska Natura 2000 site that have been undertaken by Poland infringe EU law" (PDF). Politico EU. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  39. ^ "C-441/17 - Commission v Poland (Białowieża Forest)". curia.europa.eu. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  40. ^ "Poland faces €100,000-a-day fines over illegal logging in Białowieża forest". The Guardian. 2017-11-21. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  41. ^ "UNESCO urges Poland to stop logging ancient forest". www.euractiv.com. 2017-07-06. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  42. ^ Brussels, Agence France-Presse in (2017-07-31). "Poland vows to continue logging in Białowieża forest despite court ban". The Guardian. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  43. ^ "Poland violated EU laws by logging in Białowieża forest, court rules". The Guardian. 2018-04-17. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  44. ^ S.A, Telewizja Polska. "Inwazja kornika drukarza. Właściciele lasów prywatnych winią leśników". regiony.tvp.pl.
  45. ^ Ciobanu, Claudia (25 February 2020). "A Third of Poland Declared 'LGBT-Free Zone'". Balkan Insight. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  46. ^ Council of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights (3 December 2020). "Memorandum on the stigmatisation of LGBTI people in Poland". Council of Europe. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
  47. ^ "European Parliament slams 'LGBTI-free' zones in Poland". Deutsche Welle. 18 December 2019.
  48. ^ "Activist signposts Polish towns as "LGBT-free zones" in protest against anti-LGBT resolutions". January 25, 2020.
  49. ^ "Bart Staszewski Announced as New Obama Foundation European Leader". September 1, 2020.
  50. ^ "Polish magazine criticized for planning 'LGBT-free zone' stickers". NBC News. 18 July 2019. Retrieved 2021-01-13.
  51. ^ a b Charlish, Alan; Florkiewicz, Pawel; Plucinska, Joanna (18 August 2020). "Polish 'LGBT-free' town gets state financing after EU funds cut". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 19, 2020.
  52. ^ Luxmoore, Jonathan (August 19, 2019). "Church in Poland continues confrontation with the LGBTQ community". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  53. ^ "State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary". European Commission. 16 September 2020. Retrieved 2021-01-13.
  54. ^ a b "Polish Lawmakers OK Disciplining Judges; EU Decries Move". The New York Times. Retrieved 2019-12-21.
  55. ^ Jan Strupczewski (20 December 2019). "Poland lower house adopts judiciary reform despite EU concerns". Reuters. Retrieved 2019-12-21.
  56. ^ Gallagher, Conor. "Irish judges to condemn Polish government's judicial policy". The Irish Times. Retrieved Jan 12, 2020.
  57. ^ Ptak, Alicja (Jan 9, 2020). "EU's top judge warns Poland over overhaul of judiciary". Reuters. Retrieved Jan 12, 2020 – via www.reuters.com.
  58. ^ "Mass protests erupt across Poland over plan to punish judges". AP NEWS. Dec 18, 2019. Retrieved Jan 12, 2020.
  59. ^ "Poland could be forced to leave EU by its judicial reforms, top court says". Euronews. 18 December 2019. Retrieved 2019-12-21.
  60. ^ Deutsche Welle (www.dw.com) (17 December 2019). "Poland's judicial reforms put EU membership at risk, warns top court". DW.COM. Retrieved Jan 12, 2020.
  61. ^ "Time is fast running out for judicial independence in PiS-ruled Poland". euronews. Dec 17, 2019. Retrieved Jan 12, 2020.
  62. ^ "Letter from Józef Szczurek-Żelazko to consultants". twitter.com. 20 March 2020. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  63. ^ "Ministerstwo Zdrowia chce kontrolować wypowiedzi wojewódzkich konsultantów medycznych" [The Minister of Health wants to control voivodeship medical consultants' freedom of speech]. Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 2020-03-26. Archived from the original on 2020-03-27. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  64. ^ Mielcarek, Mariusz (2020-03-26). "Pielęgniarki - położna napisała jak jest w szpitalu. Została zwolniona!" [Nurses - a midwife wrote about the situation in a hospital. She was fired!]. Portal Pielęgniarek i Położnych (in Polish). Archived from the original on 2020-03-27. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  65. ^ "Poland celebrates record voter turnout since 1989 elections". TVN24. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
  66. ^ "Wybory do Sejmu i Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 2019 r." sejmsenat2019.pkw.gov.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  67. ^ Day, Matthew (2019-10-15). "Biased state broadcaster left Polish voters with limited choice in election, report says". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  68. ^ "Polish presidential election managed well despite legal uncertainties, but intolerance and public media bias tarnished campaign, international observers say". osce.org. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  69. ^ Metcalfe, Percy (12 August 2020). ""No apologies, no shame": the rise of Poland's guerrilla LGBT activists". Notes From Poland. Archived from the original on 5 September 2020. Retrieved 18 August 2020.
  70. ^ a b "Polish Stonewall? Protesters decry government's anti-LGBTQ attitudes". NBC News. Associated Press. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 18 August 2020.
  71. ^ "W całym kraju demonstracje solidarności z osobami LGBT i "Margot"". Onet Wiadomości (in Polish). 8 August 2020. Archived from the original on 17 August 2020. Retrieved 19 August 2020.
  72. ^ Sokolowski | AP, Monika Scislowska and Czarek. "Desecration trial opens over LGBT rainbow put on Polish icon". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 2021-01-14. Retrieved 2021-01-13.
  73. ^ "Poland: The Constitutional Court Repeals Eugenic Abortion". ECLJ. 2020-10-23.
  74. ^ "W całej Polsce protesty przeciwko zaostrzeniu aborcji. Trwa "Marsz na Warszawę", doszło do starć [RELACJA NA ŻYWO]". Onet Wiadomości (in Polish). 30 October 2020. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
  75. ^ "Poland enforces controversial near-total abortion ban". BBC News. 2021-01-28. Retrieved 2021-02-02.
  76. ^ a b "Polish police arrest MPs as Tusk vs. Duda rule-of-law battle heats up". POLITICO. 2024-01-09. Retrieved 2024-01-16.
  77. ^ Uchwała Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 6 marca 2024 r. w sprawie usunięcia skutków kryzysu konstytucyjnego lat 2015–2023 w kontekście działalności Trybunału Konstytucyjnego (PDF) (in Polish), Sejm, 6 March 2024, Wikidata Q127536041, archived (PDF) from the original on 17 July 2024
  78. ^ "2021 Rule of Law Report: Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Poland". European Commission. 20 July 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  79. ^ "Areas of EU action". European Commission. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Polish_constitutional_crisis&oldid=1251940330"