Draft talk:SmartXML
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
It's
[edit]@DoubleGrazing, Hello! SmartXML only live project written in the Red programming language. Red is an extremely unique language in itself (successor of Rebol). I removed all the “marketing” from the article. I would like the wiki to have information about tools written in Red, so that I can refer to them in the article about Red. Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Luca-is-my-nic: okay, so you need to demonstrate that the subject is notable per WP:GNG. This draft just tells us what the thing is or does, and is written entirely from the subject's point of view; that's what makes this promotional. We want to know what entirely independent third parties have said about this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing Who can act as such a person? The creators of the Red language have an indirect interest in this. Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- We're talking secondary sources, typically published media (print or broadcast). See the WP:GNG standard for more info. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing Who can act as such a person? The creators of the Red language have an indirect interest in this. Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)