Draft:SmartXML

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,264 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · SmartXML (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 42 hours ago by Luca-is-my-nic (talk: D · +) · Last edited 42 hours ago by Luca-is-my-nic

Submission declined on 19 June 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by HitroMilanese 5 months ago. Last edited by Luca-is-my-nic 42 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 20 March 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by DoubleGrazing 8 months ago.

Comment: Presented sources do not help in demonstrating notability. Please see WP:GNG and add references from independent and reliable sources. Hitro talk 10:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

SmartXML is an application developed^[1] in Red, designed for processing XML files. It solves a number of parsing problems described in the book XPath and XPointer: Locating Content in XML Documents^[2]. It supports PostgreSQL^[3]. Unlike the popular XPath parsing language, it is not vulnerable to XPath Injection attacks^[4] and has its own parsing rules system.

Features

Does not require an XSD schema
Allows missing sections to be completed
Allows you to generate patches for the database
Allows you to upload data to relational databases
Allows to upload data to nosql databases
Supports batch processing mode
Support for parsing expression grammar (PEG)

References

^ "Red in the real world". red-lang.org.
^ "John Simpson. XPath and XPointer: Locating Content in XML Documents". oreilly.com.
^ "Tool for loading XML into PostgreSQL". postgresql.org. 17 April 2024.
^ "XPath Injection attacks". owasp.org.

External links

Official website

Category:Query languages Category:XML data access

[1] "Red in the real world". red-lang.org.

[2] "John Simpson. XPath and XPointer: Locating Content in XML Documents". oreilly.com.

[3] "Tool for loading XML into PostgreSQL". postgresql.org. 17 April 2024.

[4] "XPath Injection attacks". owasp.org.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

Features

See also

References

External links