This page is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
How do you determine if a photograph is fair use for a wikipedia article?
I'm wanting to post an undated photograph of Piest standing with his sister and an unknown man at an undisclosed event (https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9c/8b/b8/9c8bb8a2828a91316f79cad4572c181b.jpg), but I'm not certain if it is copyrighted. Various versions of the photograph have been used by a variety of blog posts, books I've read, and even the earlier iterations of Gacy's wikipedia article. Thus, I'm not at all certain on the image's original source, but my assumptions is that it might've been shared with by Piest family with the investigators.
As someone who knows next to nothing about Wikipedia's image policies, is that photograph permissible for this page? Randomuser335S (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the image is proven to have been published in the United States (verifiably) before March 1, 1989, without copyright notice, it should be fair use. There are at least three images of Robert Piest I have found online (incl. this one) which have been published in periodicals and which could be uploaded to the Commons with the app. license as they do not state the name of the author, the year, and the "copyright" symbol. (see here). I cannot find the image you refer to in a newspaper or magazine, though.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just published the photo on this draft, as I'm not aware of it having any copyright notices.
Here are some webpages and articles that have used a variation of the photograph (though most of them are cropped to only the top halves of Piest and his sister):
