Talk:Lilias Fraser
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Draft: Lilias Fraser references
[edit]I had to resort to the wikipedia entry for the Australian Directors Guild Cecil Holmes Award -- I could not find the listing of the award going to Lilias Fraser that is in wikipedia anywhere else.
I am concerned that some of the information I have cited is only available in an oral history recording/transcript from the National Film & Sound Archive. Nevertheless, I have been at great pains to confirm this material. For example, the director Ken Russell is mentioned in the oral history and I was able to confirm the connection online in a round-about way but to my complete satisfaction. I am a historian of Australian cinema and know the deceptions -- that's the only word for it -- that are published as fact in so much that is written about film (both people and events) so there can be no one more skeptical of the claims of filmmakers than I am. Indeed, there are a several claims about Lilias Fraser that have been published online that I am sure are not true. However in this case, I absolutely stand by what is in the draft article.
I have tried to give Fraser's life just a bit of context without being able to give the references -- for example, I know about industrial documentaries and commercials being central to the survival of Australian film producers in the 50s and 60s through my research for my book The Shadowcatchers -- but none of the sources are online. (They ARE in magazines and catalogues in the Mitchell Library and formerly in my own now disbanded collection.)
I don't know what you do in this case....
I was asked by colleagues to write this entry -- and I couldn't say no. If it has to be cut, so be it. Martha1 (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit] Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.smh.com.au/national/through-the-lens-determinedly-20041119-gdk57t.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/16 November 2023
- Accepted AfC submissions
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class WikiProject Arts articles
- WikiProject Arts articles
- C-Class Feminism articles
- Low-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- WikiProject Australia articles