Draft:Shapr3D
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,870 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 7 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
- Comment: Please see WP:ORGTRIV. Routine publications, like funding announcements, do not count towards notability. Press releases and random blogs are not reliable sources. C F A 💬 15:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Developer(s) | Shapr3D Zrt |
---|---|
Operating system | iPadOS, Windows, macOS, visionOS |
Type | CAD |
Website | shapr3d |
Shapr3D is 3D modeling software initially released for iPadOS to work with the Apple Pencil and multi-touch gesturing as a workflow. It has been ported to run on macOS, Windows, and visionOS.[1][2][3]
History
[edit]Shapr3D launched using the open source Open Cascade Engine in 2016 but switched over to Parasolid geometric modeling kernel for a better user experience.[4][5] The founder is Istvan Csanady and the company is headquartered in Budapest, Hungary.[6] In 2020 Shapr3d won the Apple Design Award.[7]
File formats supported
[edit]Import
[edit]2D
[edit]3D
[edit]
|
Export
[edit]2D
[edit]3D
[edit]
|
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Tara, Roopinder (September 14, 2022). "Shapr3D Is Released with Cloud-based Multiple Platform Support". Engineering.com.
- ^ AP, Anthony Frausto-Robledo, AIA, NCARB, LEED (July 23, 2021). "INSIDER: Shapr3D is Bold on Apple and CAD Dominance". Architosh.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Shapr3D for CNC". www.grzsoftware.com.
- ^ "Shapr3D 3.0 Brings Parasolid 3D Modeling to iPad Pro « Fabbaloo". www.fabbaloo.com. 14 December 2017.
- ^ "Shapr3D Brings Powerful 3D CAD Modeling to iPad Pro" (Press release).
- ^ "Istvan Zsolt CSANADY personal appointments - Find and update company information - GOV.UK". find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk.
- ^ Phelan, David. "The 8 Best Apps Of 2020: All Apple Design Award Winners Revealed". Forbes.
- ^ "Supported file types – Shapr3D Help Center". 10 September 2024.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.