Draft:Review Commons
| Submission declined on 25 August 2024 by Youknowwhoistheman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Doing a quick google it look notable just need expanding without copyright violations and another independent source or two KylieTastic (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Review Commons was established in 2019 by the European Molecular Biology Organization and ASAPbio.[1]
In December 2023 the Royal Society journal Open Biology became an affiliated journal.[2] As of August 2024, Review Commons had 28 affiliate journals.[3] Editors at some journals were initially reluctant to participate although were now satisfied with the results. [4]
EMBO accepts a first author refereed preprint from Review Commons as equivalent to a first author publication in terms of eligibility for its Postdoctoral Fellowship scheme.[5]
Universitätsbibliothek Bern published an explanation and critique of Review Commons.[6] Group Leader at Lund University in Sweden, Nick Leigh, published a blogpost on his experience of using Review Commons in 2023. [7]
References
[edit]- ^ "Review Commons is now LIVE - The Official PLOS Blog". 9 December 2019.
- ^ "Open Biology joins Review Commons and now accepts submissions accompanied by reviews from Review Commons. | Royal Society". royalsociety.org. 4 December 2023.
- ^ "Homepage". Review Commons.
- ^ "Researchers push preprint reviews to improve scientific communications. | Science". science.org. 19 December 2022.
- ^ "Refereed preprints recognized as eligibility criterion for EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowships. | EMBO". embo.org. 20 September 2022.
- ^ "Review Commons: News from scholarly publishing". YouTube. 10 June 2024.|
- ^ "Review Commons Experience". 19 May 2023.