Category talk:Fictional cyborgs

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Robotics

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles

Science Fiction

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles

Jean-Luc Pircard vs Locutus

Resolved

The character Jean-Luc Pircard is clearly not a cyborg. For accuracy, should be replaced with Locutus of Borg. (Even though they are directed to the same article.) Evmore 19 Jul 2005

Done. You can add categories to redirects if it is done on the same line as the redirect. -- nae'blis _(talk) 19:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added this category to the Locutus redirect. I cannot find the your edit, Nae'blis about it. Anyway, hopefully this will solve the issue forever. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found your edit. It was on Locutus of Borg. Your addition had been removed by a person who didn't understand its motivations. I'm not sure which of the two pages is better to use as the "real" redirect. I suppose "Locutus" would be searched for more often even if "Locutus of Borg" is probably more correct. We can leave things as they are for now. Jason Quinn (talk) 21:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]