Jump to content

2016 Croydon tram derailment

Coordinates: 51°22′27″N 0°04′32″W / 51.3743°N 0.0755°W / 51.3743; -0.0755
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2016 Croydon tram derailment
The derailed tram at Sandilands Junction
2016 Croydon tram derailment is located in Greater London
2016 Croydon tram derailment
2016 Croydon tram derailment is located in London Borough of Croydon
2016 Croydon tram derailment
Details
Date9 November 2016; 8 years ago (2016-11-09)
06:07 GMT
LocationClose to Sandilands tram stop, Croydon, London
Coordinates51°22′27″N 0°04′32″W / 51.3743°N 0.0755°W / 51.3743; -0.0755
CountryUnited Kingdom
LineTramlink
OperatorFirstGroup for Tramlink
Incident typeDerailment
CauseExcessive speed on curve due to driver error (microsleep)
Statistics
Trains1
Passengers69
Crew1
Deaths7
Injured62 (19 serious)
Legend
to Beckenham Junction and Elmers End
 Addiscombe
Addiscombe Road
All routes
Sandilands
Sandilands Tunnels
 Lloyd Park
Direction
to New Addington
A map of the accident scene, showing the tram lying by the southern half of a fork junction
Location where the tram came to rest. The blue arrows indicate the direction of travel.
A photo of the accident site in 2010, showing a tram exiting the tunnel and entering the curve
The site of the incident, in 2010. The tram is running towards the camera and entering the sharp curve on which the derailment occurred.

On 9 November 2016, a tram operated by Tramlink in London derailed and overturned on a sharp bend approaching a junction. Of 69 passengers, there were seven fatalities and 62 injured, 19 of whom sustained serious injuries.[1] This was the first tram incident in the United Kingdom in which passengers died since 1959.

The service was running from New Addington to Wimbledon via Croydon, and was on the approach to Sandilands tram stop soon after 06:00. The speed limit dropped from 80 km/h (50 mph) to 20 km/h (12 mph) at the junction, but the driver did not slow down significantly.

A Rail Accident Investigation Branch investigation found that the driver of the tram had lost awareness before the crash, possibly as a result of microsleep. It also criticised the lack of signage in advance of the sudden change in speed limit.

An inquest returned verdicts of accidental death on all seven victims. In March 2022, the Office of Rail and Road announced that it was to prosecute the driver of the tram, Tram Operations Limited and Transport for London over the accident. In June 2023, the driver was cleared after a trial at the Old Bailey.

Accident

[edit]

The accident took place in the dark and during heavy rain at 06:07,[2] on a sharp left curve approach­ing the points where the route from New Addington (on which the tram was operating) converges with the line from Beckenham Junction and Elmers End.[3][4][5] The curve is located in a cutting, which comes almost immediately after the line emerges from a series of three tunnels on a 1-mile (1.6 km) straight section of track after leaving Lloyd Park tram stop. It has been described as a "sharp bend",[6] and has a 20 km/h (12 mph) speed restriction.[2]

The tram entered the curve at a speed of approximately 73 km/h (45 mph)[7] and derailed, overturning on its right side and coming to a stand 25 m (27 yards) beyond the point of derailment, damaging the side of the tram and ejecting several passengers through broken windows.[7] The tram involved was No. 2551, a Bombardier CR4000 constructed in 1998 by Bombardier Transportation, a two-section articulated unit with a maximum design speed of 80 km/h (50 mph).[7]

The emergency services confirmed that 51 people were injured, and initially stated that five had died.[6][8] The death toll later rose to seven.[9] The victims, six men and a woman, were between 19 and 63 years old.[10] Sixteen of the survivors were described as having serious or life-threatening injuries.[7][11] The final casualty figures were seven dead and 62 injured, 19 seriously. One person was uninjured.[1]

It was the deadliest tram accident in the United Kingdom since an accident at Dover in 1917 killed eleven and injured 60,[12][13] and the first in the United Kingdom in which passengers died since three people died in an accident in Glasgow in 1959.[14] It is also the deadliest accident on any rail network in the UK since the 2001 Great Heck rail crash.[13]

Aftermath

[edit]

The injured were taken to St George's Hospital in Tooting, and to Croydon University Hospital.[6] As well as the 51 people taken to hospital, seven more made their own way to hospital for treatment. Twenty-two ambulances,[15] eight fire engines, and over 70 firefighters from the London Fire Brigade were sent to the scene.[16] Assistance was given by Croydon Council, the Red Cross, Salvation Army and railway chaplains.[17] FirstGroup, which operates the tram service on behalf of Transport for London (TfL), said it was "shocked and saddened by what happened."[16] An extra minute was added to the two-minute Armistice Day silence at Croydon Cenotaph.[16] TfL later made an offer to cover the funeral expenses of the victims.[18]

During the night of 10–11 November, the tram was righted in preparation for removal from the accident site,[19] and it was removed on the morning of 12 November. The tram had suffered serious damage to its right side, onto which it had overturned.[20][21]

After the accident, no services operated on the line between East Croydon and Addington Village, Harrington Road or Elmers End. Partial tram services ran between East Croydon and Wimbledon, between New Addington and Addington Village, and between Beckenham Junction and Harrington Road. Full services were reinstated on 18 November.[22][23]

It was found that the speed restriction sign for the bend at Sandilands was not visible to drivers until the tram had travelled 90 to 120 m (98 to 131 yards) past the point where braking would need to have been initiated to reach the required speed at the sign ⁠— ⁠drivers "were expected to know this from their knowledge of the route".[7] At Sandilands, an additional speed restriction was imposed before the curve, and chevron signs were installed to give better warning of the curve.[7] Chevron signs were also installed at three other locations on the Croydon Tramlink system.[24] Following recommendations made in the first interim report into the accident, tram systems in the United Kingdom introduced stepped speed reductions where there was a required reduction in speed of 30 km/h (19 mph) or more. This affected systems in Blackpool, Edinburgh, the West Midlands and Nottingham.[7]

In March 2017, it was reported that Tramtrack Croydon and TfL had admitted liability for the accident. Victims and survivors would not have to sue for compensation for losses caused by the accident.[25] In August 2017, TfL confirmed they would be altering Tramlink timetables to take account of reduced speed limits.[26]

In November 2017, two days of strikes by tram drivers were announced following the installation of fatigue monitoring devices. The devices shine an infrared light into the driver's face and are capable of generating an alert and vibrating the driver's chair if eye movements indicate a lack of attention. Some drivers have raised concerns about health and safety issues, and have described the device as a "spy in the cab".[27]

On 22 January 2018, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) organised a safety summit in Manchester to discuss the findings of the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) report on the investigation into the accident.[28] In January 2019, it was announced that all trams on the system were to be fitted with a system which would automatically apply the brakes if the tram exceeded the speed limit.[29] As of July 2019[needs update], tram 2551 was still in the custody of the RAIB in Farnborough and had not returned to service.[30]

The decision that no prosecutions were to take place meant that an inquest could be held. A pre-inquest review was held at Croydon Town Hall on 25 September 2019. The driver of the tram did not attend, saying he was unwell. His decision was criticised by the barrister representing five of the victims. The full inquest was due to begin on 19 October 2020,[31] but was delayed until 17 May 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The inquest was held at the Fairfield Halls, Croydon.[32][33] A jury was sworn in on 17 May,[34] and on 22 July returned a verdict of accidental death. Relatives of the victims of the accident announced that they intend to call on Attorney General Michael Ellis to apply to the High Court for a fresh inquest.[35] The mother of one of the victims called for a public inquiry into the accident.[36]

Investigations

[edit]

British Transport Police

[edit]

The 42-year-old tram driver was arrested by the British Transport Police on suspicion of manslaughter on the day of the accident.[9][37] After questioning, he was released on bail until May 2017.[37] According to Metro, one aspect of the police investigation was whether or not the tram driver fell asleep; and The Guardian reported that some passengers said the driver had blacked out at the controls.[38][39] In November 2017, it was reported that a file was being prepared for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), who would decide whether or not a trial would take place.[27] In May 2019 it was reported that the CPS were still awaiting the file from the British Transport Police, who were still gathering evidence.[40] On 31 October 2019, British Transport Police and the CPS announced that neither the driver, operating company or TfL would face prosecution. The CPS stated that while there was evidence of negligence by the driver, it did not count as "gross" and so "manslaughter by gross negligence" could not apply. Prosecutors also stated that because the section of tramway where the crash happened was neither legally a railway nor a public place then various other potential offences would not apply.[41] However, a prosecution was subsequently started by the ORR.[42]

A former driver suggested to The Times that a blackout was a possibility, due to the erratic shift patterns that the drivers had to adhere to. He also said that the vending machine at the tram depot was stocked only with energy drinks, and that "Nobody is ever fully awake; I was always in a bit of a daze and that is because the way the shifts work doesn't allow the drivers to get a regular sleep pattern."[43] Following this, multiple sources reported on a video apparently showing a different driver struggling to stay awake at the controls.[44][45] The driver concerned was suspended pending an investigation into the matter.[46]

Office of Rail and Road

[edit]

The ORR opened its own investigation into the accident, concentrating on whether or not safety rules were followed.[18] They confirmed that British trams are not fitted with an overspeed protection system.[6][47] The ORR was expected to make an announcement about its investigation early in 2018.[48] On the third anniversary of the accident, the ORR tweeted that its investigation was ongoing.[49]

Rail Accident Investigation Branch

[edit]

The RAIB also investigated the accident, with data from the tram's on-board event recorder being analysed.[50] The RAIB stated that initial indications suggested that the tram was travelling at a significantly higher speed than permitted.[3] Rail magazine reported that the tram's electro-magnetic track brakes had not been activated.[51] Following the accident, The Guardian reported that on 31 October passengers had made allegations on Facebook of a tram travelling round the curve at excessive speed. The Evening Standard reported an earlier passenger complaint describing the tram as "tipping" on the curve.[15][13] The driver of the tram involved in the incident of 31 October was not the one involved in the accident on 9 November.[52]

The interim report was released a week later on 16 November 2016. At the time of the accident, it was dark and it was raining heavily. There was no evidence of any track defects, or obstructions on the track, that could have contributed to the derailment. Initial investigation did not indicate any malfunction of the tram's braking system.[2] Initial findings were that the tram was travelling at approximately 70 km/h (43 mph) at the time of the accident—far exceeding the speed restriction.[53] The RAIB interim report noted that "a tram approaching the Sandilands Junction area from Lloyd Park at 80 km/h (50 mph) would need to brake at its full service rate of 1.3 m/s² for approximately 180 metres (4.3 ft/s2 for 590 ft) before the speed restriction board in order to be travelling at 20 km/h (12 mph) when the board was reached." The On Tram Data Recorder (OTDR) indicated that some braking had occurred within this distance but only sufficient to reduce the tram's speed from 80 to 70 km/h.[2]

A recommendation was made that a further speed limit should be introduced prior to the one for the curve at Sandilands Junction before the line reopened to traffic.[2] The recommendation was accepted and three further speed restrictions were put in place before the line reopened.[21][23] The report also found that a number of passengers with fatal or serious injuries had been ejected from the tram through broken bodyside and door windows.[2] In November 2016, Rail magazine called for the RAIB to complete its investigation and release the final report "much more rapidly than has become the norm".[51]

A second interim report was released on 20 February 2017.[7] In April 2017, it was reported that there had been three cases of speeding on the section of line which included the accident site in the period November 2016 – April 2017. In one case, a tram was reported to be travelling at 64 km/h (40 mph) in a 40 km/h (25 mph) zone.[54] Within the second interim report the RAIB noted that drivers of trams approaching the curve could be expected to sight the curve and the speed restriction sign from 90 metres (300 ft) with full beam headlights and 60 metres (200 ft) with dipped beam headlights. Although the report states that the tram's braking system was not capable of slowing the tram sufficiently between the point where the speed restriction sign became visible and the point at which the speed restriction is enforced, it also says, "There was no sign to indicate to drivers where they should begin to apply the brake for the Sandilands curve; they were expected to know this from their knowledge of the route."[7]

In the light of the first interim report the ORR requested that all operators of light rail tramway systems apply a system of stepped speed restrictions where reductions in speed greater than 30 km/h (19 mph) are required by changes in the characteristics of the track.[7]

The final report was published on 7 December 2017. Driver error was found to be the cause of the accident, with the most likely scenario being that the driver had a microsleep episode approaching the bend.[55] Fifteen recommendations were made.[1] Key findings of the RAIB investigation were that the tram's windows, which were made of toughened glass, were not strong enough to contain passengers inside the tram. All the fatalities had been ejected through the right side windows. Laminated glass would not have broken, improving the survivability of the accident. Regulations applying to trams were similar to those applying to buses. If railway regulations had applied, laminated glass would have been fitted. The tram's operators had not considered it possible for a tramcar to overturn. There had been insufficient reporting of previous incidents by drivers, who feared that they would be disciplined rather than such reports being seen as an opportunity to learn a safety lesson (a blame culture rather than a just culture). The system for dealing with complaints from passengers was not fit for purpose. The investigation also found that trams were not as safe as the ORR previously thought, having a higher accident rate than other rail transport and also buses and coaches.[48]

An update to the final report was issued on 24 October 2018. The update included the addition of a Transport for London (TfL) audit of Tram Operations Limited's fatigue risk management system, a copy of a letter sent to all UK tram operators and some minor technical corrections.[56] In response to Recommendation 1 of the final report, the Light Rail Safety and Standards Board (LRSSB) was established.[57] The ORR has observer status on the LRSSB.[58]

Transport for London

[edit]

TfL commissioned SNC-Lavalin to carry out an investigation into the accident. The investigation report was published in January 2018.[59] TfL stated that all recommendations from the RAIB final report would be implemented.[48]

Victoria Derbyshire programme

[edit]

In April 2017, the BBC Two programme Victoria Derbyshire reported that its own investigation into drivers falling asleep at the controls of trams on the Tramlink network revealed four such cases. Six drivers claimed that the dead-man's vigilance device fitted to the trams was not fit for purpose. Tramlink stated that the devices were "fully functional".[54]

New safety measures

[edit]

During 2019, an automatic system to apply the tram brakes if the speed limit is exceeded at "high risk locations" on the Tramlink network was installed. On tramcars, the thickness of the window safety film was increased from 100 to 175 μm (0.0039 to 0.0069 inches), to prevent passengers being ejected during an accident, and emergency lighting, independent of the tram battery, was installed.[60] In April 2019, the RAIB reported that the addition of the thicker film to Tramlink trams had been implemented. Tests had shown that containment provided by the film had been improved.[57]

Prosecution

[edit]

On 24 March 2022, the Office of Rail and Road announced that it was to prosecute the driver of the tram, Tram Operations Limited (TOL) and Transport for London (TfL) over the accident.[42]

The trial started on 10 June 2022 at Croydon Magistrates Court. TOL and TfL pleaded guilty to offences of "failure to ensure the health and safety of passengers on the Croydon Tramlink network, so far as reasonably practicable" under Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.[61] TOL were fined £4 million and TfL were fined £10 million. Each company was also ordered to pay £234,404 in costs and a £170 victim surcharge.[62]

The tram driver pleaded not guilty to a charge of "failure to take reasonable care of passengers", under section 7(a) of that act. The case was sent to the Crown Court for a pre-trial hearing and case management.[61] In May 2023, his trial opened at the Old Bailey.[63] On 19 June, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty in respect of the charges faced by the tram driver.[64]

Memorials

[edit]
Crash memorial close to the accident site

There are two memorials to the crash – one by the site of the crash itself on Sandilands Road, and another in New Addington.[65]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "Overturning of a tram at Sandilands junction, Croydon 9 November 2016" (PDF). RAIB. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 December 2017. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  2. ^ a b c d e f "Fatal accident involving the derailment of a tram at Sandilands Junction, Croydon – 9 November 2016" (PDF). Rail Accident Investigation Branch. 16 November 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
  3. ^ a b "Investigation into a fatal accident involving a tram near Sandilands Junction, Croydon, 9 November 2016". Rail Accident Investigation Branch. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  4. ^ "BBC London Live: Latest updates". BBC News. 9 November 2016. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  5. ^ "Croydon Tram Derails: Several Feared Dead After Crash". LBC. 9 November 2016. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  6. ^ a b c d "Croydon tram: Five dead and 50 injured after derailment". BBC News. 9 November 2016. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Report IR1/2017 February 2017. Rail Accident Investigation: Interim Report 2. Fatal accident involving the derailment of a tram at Sandilands Junction, Croydon 9 November 2016" (PDF). Rail Accidents Investigation Branch. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 February 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2017.
  8. ^ Tom Powell (9 November 2016). "Croydon tram derailment: Several feared dead and dozens injured after tram overturns at Sandilands". London Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  9. ^ a b "BTP | Updated statement on tram derailment – Croydon". media.btp.police.uk. British Transport Police. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  10. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Who were the victims?". BBC News. 13 November 2016. Archived from the original on 13 November 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  11. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Driver held on suspicion on manslaughter". BBC News. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
  12. ^ Horn, J. V. (1955). "Chapter VI. The tramways during the First World War". The Story of the Dover Corporation Tramways, 1897–1936. London: The Light Railway Transport League.
  13. ^ a b c Davis, Barney; Watts, Matt; Sleigh, Sophia. "Croydon tram crash: first victim named as Crystal Palace fan, 19 who was on his way to work". London Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
  14. ^ "Several killed and more than 50 injured as tram overturns in Croydon". ITV News. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  15. ^ a b Ross, Alice; Gayle, Damien; Topham, Gwyn (10 November 2016). "Croydon tram crash: police examine reports of incident in previous week". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  16. ^ a b c "Croydon tram crash: Crane to lift carriages from site". BBC News. Archived from the original on 11 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  17. ^ Clinnick, Richard; Browne, Stefanie; Stephen, Paul (23 November 2016). "Croydon tram speeding at 70kph on 20kph curve". Rail. No. 814. Peterborough: Bauer Consumer Media. pp. 6–7. ISSN 0953-4563.
  18. ^ a b "Croydon tram crash: Funeral costs offer from Transport for London". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
  19. ^ Gillett, Francesca. "Croydon tram crash: Giant crane arrives as work begins to move wreckage". London Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 11 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  20. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Carriages being removed from site". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 November 2016. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
  21. ^ a b "Croydon tram crash: Driver was 'three times over speed limit'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
  22. ^ "Status Updates Tram". Transport for London. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
  23. ^ a b "Croydon tram line services resume". BBC News. Archived from the original on 19 November 2016. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
  24. ^ "Croydon tram crash victims 'ejected through windows'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
  25. ^ "Croydon tram crash survivor's life 'now a nightmare'". BBC News. 15 March 2017. Archived from the original on 6 May 2017. Retrieved 24 April 2017.
  26. ^ Booth, Samantha (30 August 2017). "The timetable for Croydon trams is to change because of lower speed limits after fatal crash". Croydon Advertiser. Local World. Retrieved 31 August 2017.[permanent dead link‍]
  27. ^ a b "Croydon tram bosses install infra-red beams to shine on drivers' faces to check they are awake – drivers to strike in protest". Evening Standard. 1 November 2017. Archived from the original on 8 November 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  28. ^ "ORR organises Croydon tram safety summit". Office of Rail and Road. 19 January 2018. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  29. ^ "London trams to get automatic braking system". BBC News. Archived from the original on 14 January 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  30. ^ "Croydon Tram 2551". Transport for London via WhatDoTheyKnow. 24 June 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
  31. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Victims' families want apology from driver". BBC News. 25 September 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2020.
  32. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Inquest postponed until Spring 2021". BBC News. 5 November 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  33. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Fresh delays to inquest 'unfair'". BBC News. 4 December 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  34. ^ "Croydon tram crash inquest: Jury sworn in". BBC News Online. 17 May 2021. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
  35. ^ "Croydon tram crash inquest: Passengers accidentally killed, jury concludes". BBC News. 22 July 2021. Retrieved 22 July 2021.
  36. ^ Edwards, Tom (22 July 2021). "Croydon tram crash inquest: Unanswered questions for families". BBC News. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
  37. ^ a b "Croydon tram driver bailed as first victim is named". Sky News. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
  38. ^ Morley, Nicole (9 November 2016). "Crowdfunding page launched for victims of Croydon tram crash that killed 7". Metro. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  39. ^ Siddique, Haroon; Gayle, Damien; Rawlinson, Kevin (9 November 2016). "Croydon tram driver 'blacked out' in crash that killed seven, claim passengers". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
  40. ^ Truelove, Sam (9 May 2019). "Croydon tram crash police investigation slammed as a 'national disgrace'". MyLondon. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  41. ^ "CPS statement on Croydon Tram crash charging decision". Crown Prosecution Service. 31 October 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2019.
  42. ^ a b "Croydon tram crash company to face prosecution along with driver Alfred Dorris and TfL". ITN. 24 March 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  43. ^ Lianne Kolirin (14 November 2016). "Tram drivers left 'in a daze' by erratic shifts". The Times. No. 72067. London. p. 17. ISSN 0140-0460.
  44. ^ "Croydon tram driver suspended after video of man 'asleep' at controls". The Guardian. 19 November 2016. Archived from the original on 20 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  45. ^ "Probe into driver 'falling asleep'". London Evening Standard. 18 November 2016. Archived from the original on 21 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  46. ^ "Croydon line tram driver suspended over Sun footage". BBC News. 19 November 2016. Archived from the original on 19 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  47. ^ "Dozens injured after tram overturns in Croydon". Sky News. 9 November 2016. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  48. ^ a b c Matthews, Tom (8 December 2017). "Croydon tram crash: The key things we've learned from the RAIB report into the causes of the disaster". Croydon Advertiser. Local World. Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved 9 December 2017.
  49. ^ Office for rail and Road [@railandroad] (9 November 2019). "Our thoughts remain with those who lost their lives, alongside others who were involved; those injured, survivors and their families and friends, on today the third anniversary of the Sandilands tram incident in Croydon. Our investigation into the event is continuing" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  50. ^ "There will be disruption 'for days' on Croydon trams after crash". Croydon Advertiser. 9 November 2016. Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
  51. ^ a b Harris, Nigel (23 November 2016). "Croydon, HS2 and NR costs...". Rail. No. 814. Peterborough: Bauer Consumer Media. p. 3. ISSN 0953-4563.
  52. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Bosses were warned of 'speeding trams'". BBC News. 14 November 2016. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
  53. ^ Gwyn Topham (16 November 2016). "Croydon tram going three times speed limit when it derailed, say investigators". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
  54. ^ a b Thomas, Ed; Titheradge, Noel. "Croydon tram crash: Drivers 'fell asleep' on fatal line". BBC News. Archived from the original on 23 April 2017. Retrieved 24 April 2017.
  55. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Report says driver 'probably dozed off'". BBC News. 7 December 2017. Archived from the original on 5 January 2019. Retrieved 5 January 2019.
  56. ^ "Updating of RAIB report 18/2017, Sandilands junction". Rail Accident Investigations Branch. 24 October 2018. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
  57. ^ a b "Annual report for 2018". Rail Accident Investigations Branch. Archived from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
  58. ^ "Overturning of a tram at Sandilands junction, Croydon". Office of Rail and Road. Archived from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
  59. ^ "New report reveals more details about the causes of the Croydon tram crash". The Croydon Advertiser. 24 January 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
  60. ^ Wordsworth, Nigel (14 January 2019). "New automatic braking system for London Trams". Rail Engineer. Archived from the original on 27 January 2019. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
  61. ^ a b "First court hearing of ORR's Croydon tram crash prosecution sees pleas entered". Office of Rail and Road. 10 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
  62. ^ "Tram operators fined £14 million over Croydon disaster that claimed seven lives". Independent Television News. 27 July 2023. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
  63. ^ "Croydon: Passengers 'flung around' during deadly tram crash, court hears". Sky News. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  64. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Driver not guilty over fatal derailment". BBC News Online. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  65. ^ "Croydon tram crash: Two memorials unveiled". BBC News. 9 November 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=2016_Croydon_tram_derailment&oldid=1256541184"