User talk:Jax 0677: Difference between revisions
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
{{od}} |
{{od}} |
||
[https://wiki.riteme.site/?oldid=962413026#Redirect_links_to_%3Credacted%3E Got it now?] I'm sure you think I'm a prick but you were singlehandedly enabling a completely innocent person to be harassed for absolutely no reason whatsoever. ''And'' you kept it up after this was pointed out to you. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 22:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC) |
[https://wiki.riteme.site/?oldid=962413026#Redirect_links_to_%3Credacted%3E Got it now?] I'm sure you think I'm a prick but you were singlehandedly enabling a completely innocent person to be harassed for absolutely no reason whatsoever. ''And'' you kept it up after this was pointed out to you. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 22:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC) |
||
:And yet you persist [https://wiki.riteme.site/?diff=prev&oldid=962424879]. I'm going to spell this out in terms even you can understand: if you come within 100 miles of this person in any of your edits again, the almost certain result will be that you are indefinitely blocked until you can show that you understand basic project policies, not to mention that you are possessed of human decency. If you doubt what I'm saying, please risk it; right now nothing would give me more pleasure then to see you off the project. I've seen clueless before but you take the cake. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 01:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:35, 14 June 2020
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thank you!
/* January 2020 */ thanks for the warm welcome Jax. I've been working from home and doing a lot of edits and new content. I am going to take a break now, but I hope to e able to do a lot more now that i'm getting the hang of it. (I hope)
Aaron Neville
Just created an article for that record. I'll never come back to fix the template, so all you did was make work for yourself. But hey, you kept control of something! Too bad it's online and not in your real life. L - fuckface macgee
- Reply - @TheFinalCountdownByEurope:, please sign your posts, and link to the article in question when you post on a talk page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
New York Narcotic
Unfortunately, this is because you are lazy not because of your poor writing skills. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
New redirects
It looks like you made some mistakes with the redirects you just created. Why did you redirect Shelley Luther to Coronavirus disease 2019? The mistake of redirecting several article names, such as Shooting of Rigoberto Alpizar to Talk:Death of Breonna Taylor? Clearly, Shooting of Rigoberto Alpizar should redirect to Death of Rigoberto Alpizar instead. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @BarrelProof:, my previous redirect for Shelley Luther got deleted, and sorry I made an error on the other articles. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- But Shelley Luther is not mentioned in the Coronavirus disease 2019 article. It does not seem helpful to readers to send people to that article if they are looking for information about that person. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Lynn Anderson
I already made 2 new discography pages for Lynn Anderson. The notification is not necessary anymore. See Lynn Anderson albums discography and Lynn Anderson singles discography. Please make sure you check all pages before making an assumption. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 02:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you are asking me to do. If you are insisting this needs to get done, then I suggest you do it yourself. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 02:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @ChrisTofu11961:, I have put the history merge templates in place on both articles, which must be performed by an administrator. Cut and paste moves are undesirable. Please leave the {{histmerge}} templates in place so that the history merges can be performed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I would have appreciated this clarifying statement rather than the jargon that was posted on my talk page. Please do that in the future. Thanks. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 02:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you are asking me to do. If you are insisting this needs to get done, then I suggest you do it yourself. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 02:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
"Rachel Kapelski" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rachel Kapelski. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 30#Rachel Kapelski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks for helping out with the George Floyd protests article. LoreMaster22 (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC) |
"Hankison" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hankison. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 31#Hankison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Derek Chauvin
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Derek Chauvin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Chauvin (police officer). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. StAnselm (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
List of George Floyd protests
Thanks for splitting out the Pennsylvania page. I think the same could be done for Ohio, New Jersey, and North Carolina, yeah? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @Another Believer:, perhaps. When you post on a talk page, please link to the article in question. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Archive size
Please cut it out with the archive size. It's moronic. At 70K we're getting one or two threads per archive page, which makes things very hard on people trying to review past article activity. EEng 16:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Jax0677! You added a more citations needed to the header of this article but didn't leave an edit summary. The article has 40 citations and no citations needed tags, I don't think there's a single sentence of text that doesn't have a citation. The discography is the only thing in the article that isn't cited to the cell, and there is a citation in that table. What was your thinking? —valereee (talk) 00:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- You also appear to have added a hatnote saying the page was about a musician?! WTF, dude? —valereee (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @Valereee:, Floyd "joined the hip hop group Screwed Up Click", and I just added the {{CN}} tag. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- So you thought that meant he was primarily known for his music...um...okay. I'm going to remove the header tag since you've put a cn on the specific cell. I'd suggest using edit summaries, it's really helpful. —valereee (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
More George Floyd pages
Hi, Jax 0677. I see that 29 U.S. states now have their own pages for George Floyd protests. Do you think the other 21 should have their own pages, too? Songwaters (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @Songwaters:, my thought is to create pages for each state that has a significant number of protests, or until List of George Floyd protests in the United States is below 100 kB. I am willing to make List of George Floyd protests in the United States a "collector article", which majorily contains links to state articles, and little more than that. When you comment on a talk page, please link to the page(s) in question. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, so I see that Kansas (which lists 15 cities) could have its own page, but what about Delaware (which lists 4)? Songwaters (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @Songwaters:, I recommend starting with the largest, then working down from there. The page was first split because there were too many references. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
"Entertainment industry response to George Floyd protests" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Entertainment industry response to George Floyd protests. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 10#Entertainment industry response to George Floyd protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Slatersteven (talk) 10:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
"Shelley Luther" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shelley Luther. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 10#Shelley Luther until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Calico System
Template:Calico System has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
"Cup Foods" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cup Foods. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 13#Cup Foods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Stop with the wife
This is not a joking matter -- see WP:BLPNAME. If you keep this up (including with the creation of redirects) after receiving this notice I'll ask for you to be blocked. I rarely say shit like that but you seem to be completely lacking in judgment. EEng 21:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- You can start repairing the damage by replacing all the redirects by {{Db-g7}}. If I have to find an admin to delete them you are not going to like the fallout. EEng 21:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @EEng:, please read WP:CIVIL, and please link to (Redacted) when you post on a talk page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- You're pretty slow on the uptake, and I'm not inclined to pull any punches on something like this. The idea is to not cast your BLP violation wider than necessary by advertising where it is. I hope when I look in a second I'll see you've have started taking remedial action on this. EEng 21:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Got it now? I'm sure you think I'm a prick but you were singlehandedly enabling a completely innocent person to be harassed for absolutely no reason whatsoever. And you kept it up after this was pointed out to you. EEng 22:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- And yet you persist [1]. I'm going to spell this out in terms even you can understand: if you come within 100 miles of this person in any of your edits again, the almost certain result will be that you are indefinitely blocked until you can show that you understand basic project policies, not to mention that you are possessed of human decency. If you doubt what I'm saying, please risk it; right now nothing would give me more pleasure then to see you off the project. I've seen clueless before but you take the cake. EEng 01:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)