User talk:Junkyardsparkle

Kona Lanes

This article is "finished" from my standpoint, so I've listed it for peer review, hoping to get feedback from others who may find the subject of interest. Feel free to add your opinions if you're so inclined, with my thanks. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on File:Kona Lanes roadside sign.JPG and File:Kona Lanes, Costa Mesa, CA, USA.JPG. :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 09:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lankershim Boulevard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory Boulevard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Griffith Park Zoo

Hello, and thanks for your work to improve the article Griffith Park Zoo! I have a question about the picture you added captioned "Asian elephant at the Los Angeles Zoo, 1920". I'm assuming that was really at the Griffith Park Zoo - which was the Los Angeles Zoo at the time, but which is different from the current Los Angeles Zoo. Do you think it would be appropriate to change the caption to say "Griffith Park Zoo"? I didn't want to do it without your input. --MelanieN (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do caption the image however you see fit, I simply used the file name, intending to come back to the page after a little research. It isn't clear to me whether the old zoo was ever actually called anything other than the Los Angeles Zoo in its time, not that that's particularly important. Also, I added the picture based on the assumption that the archival information describing it as the "Los Angeles Zoo" could only mean the one in Griffith Park, but if you suspect otherwise, don't hesitate to correct the situation. I'm currently trying to dig up info on any other animal parks in the area contemporary with the photo... (There are a few other pics from that set in the commons category now, by the way.) Junkyardsparkle (talk) 18:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So... after some investigating, I'm now fairly sure that the elephant image, and possibly the related ones in the collection, are actually pictures taken at the Selig zoo... I should know better than to take info like that at face value. The best evidence is from images of the studio zoo that display similar facades, and one showing the exact same structure (link is blacklisted, sorry). Oops. I'll go tell the USC people now... Junkyardsparkle (talk) 02:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, good research! Thanks for looking into this. I knew it couldn't be the current "Los Angeles Zoo" but I didn't even think about other predecessors. As for the name, I lived in Los Angeles before the opening of the current LA Zoo, and at that time the Griffith Park Zoo was called the Griffith Park Zoo. But I obviously have no idea what it was called in the 1920s! I see that you uploaded the same image to the LA Zoo article; do you think that needs recaptioning or explanation? --MelanieN (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder about the L.A. Zoo page, I was a little over-enthusiastic when I discovered the picture, I think. My impression is that the Selig zoo was the far more impressive (and photogenic) of the two while it existed, so I probably shouldn't expect to find any Griffith Park images from that era... oh well. I've adjusted the external link to the the USC archive to find ~250 later, non-PD images of the zoo, after working around an odd bug in their search syntax, so there's that... Junkyardsparkle (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for James Boon Lankershim and...

Thank you for adding a picture to James Boon Lankershim's infobox. Are you able to do the same for his father, Isaac Lankershim, please?Zigzig20s (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and long overdue... Junkyardsparkle (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wonderful.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is in one or more neighborhoods

I bet that's how it works. The citation I put in was a little dodgy, because it's a postal address. I bet you can find people to argue about whether every location covered by the Encino post office is truly in Encino or just Encino-adjacent or actually in some other neighborhood all together. This is complicated by the fact that as long as the ZIP is right it doesn't actually matter what place-name one uses, so it's possible to just make those up and still get mail. But really, I don't think it's possible to have a place in LA that's not in one or more neighborhoods.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I probably care less about the neighborhood game than anyone, maybe to an eccentric degree. My perspective is that the Sepulveda Basin is a rather large geophysical feature of the Valley, surrounded by neighborhoods. On the face of it, the idea of it belonging to any particular neighborhood seems mildly absurd to me, but don't tell Lake Balboa I said that. :P Junkyardsparkle (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A horde of blank-eyed real estate agents with perfect hair and bloody lips is slowly converging on your dwelling place as we speak, clacking their razor-sharp fangs as they lurch along. Start nailing plywood to the windows immediately. Don't call the neighborhood council, they won't help you now...— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What, again already? Good thing I always booby-trap my 1/8 scale cardboard box Eichler knock-off before I leave... Junkyardsparkle (talk) 01:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Junkyardsparkle. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 02:10, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Junkyardsparkle. You have new messages at Srich32977's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

For the Commons good deed

		A beer on me!
		My desert rat/German buddy (a.k.a. Carl Eytel) thank you! (And thanks for cropping the image.) – S. Rich (talk) 05:05, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Keister may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

File:29 West 26th Street closeup.jpg|[[Von Hoffman Building]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hollywood Freeway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:HOLLYWOOD FREEWAY NEAR VENTURA BEACH. (FROM THE DOCUMERICA-1 EXHIBITION. FOR OTHER IMAGES IN THIS ASSIGNMENT, SEE... - NARA - 553018.jpg|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go home, BracketBot, you're drunk! --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to U.S. Route 101 in California may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:HOLLYWOOD FREEWAY NEAR VENTURA BEACH. (FROM THE DOCUMERICA-1 EXHIBITION. FOR OTHER IMAGES IN THIS ASSIGNMENT, SEE... - NARA - 553018.jpg|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

la portal

The la portal is now the greater la portal. la portal is a redirect. i dont know whether we prefer to leave redirects as is. now that you know this, ill let you decide if my edit was useful or not. i have no problem with the redirects staying (there are too many to correct anyway)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes, the tragic commons, good phrase (i know the origin). i have revamped the greater la portal by the way. it was pretty much dead in the water. now its at least presentable.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't personally have an opinion as far as leaving the redirects or not, but if you do decide to convert them all (it could be an easily automated batch operation, I would think) there should probably be an explanatory edit summary to avoid confusion. I may not be the only one who wasn't aware that the L.A. portal is now a redirect. :P --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More images from the USC achieve

Hi jnkyrdsprkl, thank you for adding the image of Arcade Depot to the page. I also created a few other pages related to stations/railroads in L.A. (River Station (Los Angeles) and Los Angeles & San Pedro Railroad)and I wanted to see if you had any tips on how I could find images for them. I know from this webpage [1] that they do have images housed at the same USC collection as the image you posted but I can't figure out a way to search the collection and locate the images. Can you help me? Thanks againMonopoly31121993 (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Monopoly31121993: I was actually looking for the River Station pics when I got sidetracked (happens every time I start digging through image archives), but I'll put those articles at the top of my list for later today. The USC web collection interface has some quirks related to searching... short version: if you select a specific collection in the checkbox on the left, you'll often get more results than if you have them all selected (don't ask). Most of the relevant stuff is in the California Historical Society collection. If you find anything there you want moved to commons, you can post a link here and I'll do the dirty work, as long as it's pre-1923 or otherwise likely to be PD. A large part of that collection is already on commons, but the batch operator was being cautious about Public Domain status and missed a few... --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Amusing note: while searching for this image, I found these three copies, using totally different search terms in three different collections. :P ) jnkyrdsprkl (talk)

Wow, thank you! These are a huge help and I know exactly what you mean about getting distracted when you start to look through these archives, they're amazing. Thanks again!Monopoly31121993 (talk) 12:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is HanSangYoon.

Hello. I would like to notify you about the Pershing Square (Los Angeles Metro station) you have undone the editing. We are currently undergoing an organizing process of unified formats of the Los Angeles Metro Station pages, and therefore, we ask you not to undo the pages. --HanSangYoon (talk) 03:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing "unified" about your changes, and I didn't "undo" the page. Take a look at WP:MOSIM for clues on how (not) to add images to pages, especially if you're planning to do more of that kind of thing.

jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We are going to put the sign placard as the main image, then give in to the other images. This is the unified standards we are organizing the pages as. I already know how to add images to pages, and that's what I did to the pages. Do not revert the pages, JunkyardSparkle. We are in a process that you are disturbing. --HanSangYoon (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@HanSangYoon: Please tell me where "we" is having the discussion about this, so that I can take part. Thank you. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The 'we' you would like to know are several people who takes the pictures (Jonathan M., Simon H., Han Sang Yoon), decides what goes into the Wiki (Han Sang Yoon), and others who also helps us (Maximillion W., Bobby C.) We work to create a portfolio of organized Wikipedia pages of the Los Angeles Metro stations, starting with the Red and Purple Lines. We take pride in LA, and we are to improve pages that people are to search and learn about. I'm afraid we're strangers, and we can't let you in, but these days, you'll see during Sundays of three men doing hard work of photography all over the Metro systems. Please. Leave our work to where it should be; it is improvements. --HanSangYoon (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@HanSangYoon: Please don't do anything else until you read this: Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If you take an action, and someone disagrees, you need to discuss the issue with other interested parties. You seem to have some very strange ideas about how things work here. I'm happy that you take pride in L.A., and I like some of the pictures you've contributed (but you should probably be uploading them to Wikimedia Commons), however: you don't own the articles. The placard images don't add value, they're redundant with the infobox header. The transit articles should be mobile-friendly, without a cluster of images at the top of the article. I asked for discussion, got no response, went about restoring the pages just to have you revert the edits. This kind of thing will eventually upset people. I would hate to see your enthusiasm wasted because of a bad experience, so please try to relax and approach people in a friendlier manner... and stop reverting my edits, please. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 07:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the Bold, Revert, and the Discussing methods of Wikipedia editing. But we still believe we are contributing the pages as a benefit, since it organizes the structures of the page as the sign placards as the headings, then comes the other good old / new pictures. It is an improvement since it corresponds with the organization of other subway station pages in Wikipedia, such as Seoul Subway station pages in Korean Wikipedia, or Tokyo Subway station pages in Japanese. We are simply trying to follow their admirable system of putting the sign placards as the main page. But we, Angelinos would like to insert additional pictures that would insert colors to the pages. We moved the platform pages from the heading section to the bottom cause it did not represent the station with its official name. Take a look at Seoul Metro station pages or Tokyo Metro station pages in their respective languages, and see what came at the heading image section: the sign placards come out, not station images (some have both). We deleted some pictures cause they were too little to benefit the page by being unnecessary or too indirect, or is too blurry and a bad quality image. This is why we believe we correspond to benefitting the page and at the same time, following the rules of uploading information to make great Wikipedia pages. I also understand your point of too much pictures which makes clusters of photos on the top. We are still editing these pages, and we will balance out the pages. We also may not own the pages, but we have the right to edit the pages if they are improvement (explained earlier why they were), and reverting our pages seems to us as reverting the improvements. --HanSangYoon (talk) 07:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. Have fun! --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We thank you, and apologize if you are disappointed with us. We appreciate your understandings of our effort. --HanSangYoon (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Award from WP:Death

		Death Star
		For your diligence in finding and repairing errors in cemetery articles, you are awarded this Death Star. - Boneyard90 (talk) 14:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the inspiration to take a whirlwind tour of the world's burial grounds... Today I Learned that there's a statue of Abraham Lincoln in a Scottish cemetery... --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Metrolink (Southern California): Major accidents: Oxnard, February 2015

I have noticed your edits, how much they improve articles, and appreciate your contributions. I don't like pointing this out but your recent edit to Metrolink (Southern California): Major accidents: Oxnard, February 2015 though unnecessarily sensationalizes the actions of the driver similar to the early news accounts of the accident. Please see Talk:Metrolink_(Southern_California)#Major_accidents:_Oxnard.2C_February_2015 for my comments. Thanks for your work. Fettlemap (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fettlemap: It certainly wasn't my intention to sensationalize anything, I was just trying to clean up the awkward arrangement of the paragraph. Feel free to correct whatever aspects seem sensationalist to you. :) --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it was awkward. I made the content more neutral without lengthening the entry. --Fettlemap (talk) 23:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why

Why Moeking (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 18:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes

Yah it's the Wright one Moeking (talk) 07:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yah

It the right article Moeking (talk) 07:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!

I looked everywhere for an image for Hollywood Plaza Hotel, without success. How I wished I could go back to L.A. (my hometown) and take it myself ... and then you did! Thank you so much!! Yoninah (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: Thanks for writing the article. A photo has been on my list for a while, but the street-level view just isn't that inspiring, now that it's being used mostly as something to hang advertising on. One of these days I'll get myself some access to a building across the street for a better view of the neon sign.

--Junkyardsparkle (talk) 21:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — LA River & CHS images

Hi Junkyardsparkle, thank you for suggesting the merge of Los Angeles River bicycle path & Los Angeles River Bikeway. That caught my eye, that otherwise would have passed on, to look into them more. With the path(s) passing through so many cities, agencies, & special districts a single standard seems to be missing.

Thank you also for asking me for suggestions a long time ago before uploading a delicious big batch of Cal. Hist. Society images on Commons. I'm very sorry to not have seen your question on my talk page there until recently, and so neither replying nor giving appreciation then. CHS images are wonderful to come across on Commons, and often are the only images of a particular place or period there. Thanks again, Look2See1 t a l k → 17:12, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Look2See1: Thanks for looking into the bike path question... the one-line orphan stub seemed a little lonely out there, but it stands on its own well enough now. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monuments in Hollywood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 18:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monuments in Hollywood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul R. Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Junkyardsparkle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Junkyardsparkle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Junkyardsparkle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]