Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-07-12/WikiProject report
Appearance
Discuss this story
- Urgh! My comments/interview and a mention of myself aren't here! ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 21:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. You didn't answer any questions about the project. You only answered the question about yourself, which became part of the introduction. -Mabeenot (talk) 21:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Then why not mention me in the introduction? It's disappointing to be interviewed and then not see it published. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 22:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, same here, but that is what news is like. Not everything can be included . Airplaneman ✈ Review? 04:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Added a mention in the intro for both of you. -Mabeenot (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, same here, but that is what news is like. Not everything can be included . Airplaneman ✈ Review? 04:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Then why not mention me in the introduction? It's disappointing to be interviewed and then not see it published. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 22:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
←NerdySD, maybe you should have been mentioned; maybe not. I haven't looked at it carefully. But please note that the purpose of this page is not to include mention of particular editors—it's to provide an interesting, informative read for the whole community, on the WikiProject. I do believe users should be advised at the top of the questionnaire page that their written feedback on which the article based could appear as Signpost narrative rather than direct quotation, and when quoted might be modified to fit the run of the prose (users, of course, have the right to review the text). This is normal journalistic practice. Tony (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
← Back to WikiProject report