Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vermont/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Vermont. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Attempted deletion
An editor is attempting to delete Northeast Kingdom Community Action, a government owned social service agency. Your comments would be appreciated. Student7 (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
A request has been made to auto-assess your unassessed articles
Tim1357 (talk · contribs), a project member, has filed a request for Xenobot Mk V to auto-assess your Category:Unassessed Vermont articles. The bot uses the logic described at User:Xenobot/A. If there are any objections to this, please make them known. The bot will commence its task after 48 hours if there are none. –xenotalk 17:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Task running... –xenotalk 15:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I opted us into a reporting service by User:DASHBot. All UBLPs are listed there, and the list is updated nightly. We should try tp reference these articles. Tim1357 talk 02:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Stub article?
Two editors have taken over the United States presidential election in Vermont, 2008. The article has been "supplemented" with riveting material, perhaps with an FA, or at least a Pulitzer in mind! IMO it is well off WP:TOPIC. Because it is well off the beaten track, it is fairly easy to "take it over!" But it should still maintain Wikipedia standards IMO. In the meantime, we are lacking articles on the majority of presidential elections. Student7 (talk) 20:27, 23 June 2010 (UTC)