Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church/Related Pages

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Christianity

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles

I think this page should include all of the articles that are in any way related to Seventh-day Adventism, including all of the related articles mentioned on the WikiProject page. Let's make this a complete list, and make the list on that page an excerpt of this one, focusing on the most important pages and pages we need. --Cromwellt|Talk 16:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was the plan. I am actually working through the page Special:Whatlinkshere\Seventh-day Adventist Church at the moment to expand it.

Groups?

Should we categorise the articles by their maitenance tags as well, ie, stubs or expansion...? What groups of articles do we need, so far I'm thinking:

Demographics
Notable person biographies
Organisations (ie ADRA)
Academic Institutions
Independent ministries (3ABN)

Have I missed any? -- MyNameIsNotBob 20:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]