Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Archive March 2019
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"Collaborating institutions" in particle physics
We have various articles about international collaborations that list all the institutes where someone did something for the project at some point in the past. For stubs these lists can be much longer than the article, e.g. for COMET. Does that really help anyone? I don't see any value from these lists. --mfb (talk) 04:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- I am in favor of taking that section out. --MaoGo (talk) 07:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Rotational Diffusion
While reading the current version of Rotational diffusion, I was really surprised, that there should be five rotational time constants. In my view, there should only be three. I tried to verify the five rotational time constants in the linked papers, and regardless they were written in french, I never found anything about five rotational time constants.
I have looked into older versions of the article, its seems like the paragraph was changed to its current version ten years ago (Link to a 2009 version of the Rotational diffusion). My linked version is the last version before someone added the five time constants.
I would really appreciate, if someone is able to explain why there should be five time constants and to give me a source that I can verify that (for me) unituitive information. --Andilope (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely three, one for each of the three position axes. --MaoGo (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- That was my thought as well. I wonder why it was wrong for 10 years. Thanks for fixing it!--Andilope (talk) 07:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Inconsistency at Talk:Planck's_law#Einstein_coefficients
People with an eye for thermal/spectroscopy can take a look at that. I'd do it tonight, but it's late and my thinking hat is off at the moment. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Templates for tables of physical constants nominated for deletion
If interested, please opine at WP:Templates_for_discussion#March_9, subsection Tables of physical constants. —Quondum 02:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I have serious objections to material that has been repeatedly added to the article Wigner's friend. XOR'easter (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Phases of matter has been nominated for discussion
Category:Phases of matter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming to Category:State of matter. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Several unsourced IP edits have been made recently to this article. Expert eyes needed to check. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC).
I saw Mathematical electron on the new article bot report and have tagged it for speedy deletion per WP:G11. XOR'easter (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Bimetric gravity redux
Our anon IP-hopping friend is back at bimetric gravity, selling their pet theory again. XOR'easter (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- This indirectly led me to the page Dipole repeller, which looks like it could stand a thorough de-mystification, and a reduction in reliance upon IFLscience. XOR'easter (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- I kind of think their conduct, which has now escalated to questioning my mental health, warrants a warning of some sort, but I'd rather someone else make that call. They seem to have it out for me personally (whereas the most feeling I can summon up is a vague exasperation that the limited time I have here each day goes to this nonsense, rather than writing anything fun). XOR'easter (talk) 23:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Now with added probable sockpuppetry! I confess, this is mildly entertaining. Particularly since they reminded me of the "protons are black holes" guy; I hadn't thought about that one in years. Regrettably, though, this has started to look like a matter for ANI. XOR'easter (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- I kind of think their conduct, which has now escalated to questioning my mental health, warrants a warning of some sort, but I'd rather someone else make that call. They seem to have it out for me personally (whereas the most feeling I can summon up is a vague exasperation that the limited time I have here each day goes to this nonsense, rather than writing anything fun). XOR'easter (talk) 23:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)