Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outlines/Archive/Rationale

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Disputed

The contents of this page is disputed. It does not give a clear rationale for the existence or use of "outlines" on wikipedia, and neither was the example clear or compelling. Verbal chat 20:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

added the {{essay}} tag. If you feel that neither of the examples are compelling or clear, please edit it so it is, but don't deface this page like you did in your previous edit. Thanks -- penubag (talk) 01:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the example. Verbal chat 07:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protected

Honestly. You've agreed it's an essay. Edit-warring over it is pointless because it's only opinion based. Hopefully protecting the page will get you to talk more and agree consensus here, rather than trying to do it in edit summaries. </exasperated>. Ged UK 11:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The example is unpersuasive

In my world, a reader interested in looking up the color of water would type "color of water" into the search box, leading to an immediate happy ending. Rummaging through outline of water for the topic as described here seems pointless. Kanguole 11:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]