Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ottawa
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
User script to detect unreliable sources
[edit]I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Ottawa Municipal Elections Articles
[edit]Hi! Does anyone have an opinion on the election results tables used in municipal elections articles. These appear to be non-standard among Ottawa candidates. See Shawn Menard vs Ariel Troster as well as 2022_Ottawa_municipal_election. Is there a template used by other Ontario municipalities? I would like to go ahead and standardize these in my free time and would like some sense of whether people like one or the other approach. Thanks Andwats (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Meetup/edit-athon in Ottawa
[edit]Hello folks, the Rideau Rockcliffe Community Resource Centre in Ottawa has reached out to me to run an edit-athon/ Wiki tutorial on December 2. If anyone is interested in attending or would like to help me out, please sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/Ottawa/Edit-athon 2023 or on their eventbrite page. Cheers! -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for History of the Ottawa Senators (1992–)
[edit]History of the Ottawa Senators (1992–) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Ottawa Senators (original)
[edit]Ottawa Senators (original) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Project-Class Canada-related articles
- NA-importance Canada-related articles
- Project-Class Ontario articles
- NA-importance Ontario articles
- Project-Class Quebec articles
- NA-importance Quebec articles
- Project-Class Ottawa articles
- NA-importance Ottawa articles
- Project-Class Canadian communities articles
- NA-importance Canadian communities articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Project-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English