Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR/Assessment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lists

[edit]

Should our NASCAR-related lists be assessed as well? --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 22:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the Article progress grading scheme. There are Wikipedia:Featured lists, but there isn't the possibility for a GA class list. How to proceed, is good q, but as they are not articles, they are not under the same grading scheme. -slowpokeiv 23:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons

[edit]

What should be done about seasons? There's a bit of a backlog on the unassessed category. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 20:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've assessed all the Nextel Cup seasons that have articles. My standard is that all season articles are stub-class if there isn't info on all the races, start-class if there is info on all the races (and upward from there); mid-importance by default, and high-importance if something happened that had lasting impact on NASCAR (examples: 1971, 1975, 1979, 2003). --Coredesat talk. o_O 21:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR A-class articles

[edit]

I noticed we have some articles labeled as A-class but they didn't go through the GA process yet. Since A is above GA (I don't know why they did it like that, but whatever) shouldn't they have to be GA's before they can be A's? Recury 18:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Ware

[edit]

I saw something about assessing the Rick Ware article. His shop is only about 5 minutes from my house and I have a friend that works for his Supercross team. I maybe could help out with that article if anybody wanted me to go talk to somebody at Ware Racing. KTM Jared 683 02:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]