I made a slightly more complicated version (see left). Basically, someone's drawing it, there's an audio jigsaw in the bottom left, and I'm showing the tools of our trade. Dendodge|TalkContribs17:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The somewhat-new (i just discovered it at least) website http://tineye.com offers a fantastic way to find high-res versions of good photos. It is a visual search engine (the first I have seen--is it actually the first?). Where I have been looking for high-res versions of photos already in wikipedia, it has helped me out several times. Just paste in the URL of the photo, and it shows other places the same picture appears on the internet. It requires registration, and their database isn't exhaustive, but it's a cool tool. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would anyone here be able to restore Image:Toreador song.ogg, namely by removing the background noise and static that is in the file? N.B. if you want to coach me and tell me how to do that myself, you should be aware that I only have access to Audacity. It Is Me Here (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry you haven't gotten a response sooner. We usually discuss audio restoration in Skype (which offers free text and aucio chat and is a good format for media transfers). E-mail me for my Skype ID and I'll help you get started. Takes about 10-15 minutes to set up; well worth the effort. DurovaCharge!19:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I use audacity myself, and have had good results with this method:
Find a patch of "silence" - that is, a few seconds that have no sound except for the hiss or crackle you want to remove. If necessary, create a patch of at least a second at the end by copying shorter gaps in the music. Be careful to only include silence in here - not the fading notes of the last chord, etc.
Hit cntrl-2, Cntrl-1, Cntrl-1. This will get you at a good zoom level for the next part.
Go through, listening to the song, and, except in your patch of "silence", remove as many pops as you can by highlighting and deleting them. Don't highlight too much, or you change the tempo. Check after you removed them, because sometimes this can make things worse. If there's a large amount of crackle, just get the really, really obvious ones, maybe try the "click removal" tool (generally I find this useless, but it can help when things are really bad. and go to step 4.
Under edit, choose Select->All, then go back to the edit menu and choose "duplicate". You now have two identical tracks.
Select the patch of silence on one of these tracks (you may want to zoom back out using Cntrl-2), then go to the effect menu and choose Noise removal. Hit the "Get Noise Profile" button.
Select all of one of your two identical tracks. Home, followed by Shift+End will do this for you. Go to Effect->Noise removal and, using the default settings, remove the noise.
You now have a cleaned track and an uncleaned track. This is because noise removal removes information, so you don't want to remove the noise completely. Instead, using the slider bars on the left of each track window, adjust the relative volumes. I find that no change or -3dB to the cleaned track, and -6db or -9dB (depending on how noisy the original was) to the uncleaned is generally a good choice.
With a 158MB original and some other factors in its favor, this is definitely a candidate for restoration. We don't offer restorations upon request here (the labor is just too time consuming and we'd get swamped), but I might just try my hand at this bit of nineteenth century political history. DurovaCharge!17:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This eighteenth century Chinese map of the world is not the original upload.
Currently there are no guidelines or 'best practices' recommendations for editing images at Wikipedia or at Commons. So we have unknown numbers of images like the one linked here: attempted restorations or other major changes with little or no documentation, supplanting the original version because the edit is uploaded with the same filename. Most of the editors who do this probably mean well. Let's draft a set of best practices recommendations for image editing. DurovaCharge!19:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Iraq-m1_abrams.jpg Not that this is a bad edit, but it isn't even noted as an edit--much less what actions were performed--and it's uploaded over the same filename. The source notes still attribute it entirely to the U.S. Army website. DurovaCharge!22:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded this image a while back, after finding it while doing some research at the local historical society... I really like it, and it has a good deal of regional history included... not only the flag pole, which is gone now, but the clocktower in the background is still to this day a regional landmark... I put it up for a peer review after uploading it, and the comments I recieved ended with contacting someone here to assist in restoring it... I doubt it would ever be FP material, but maybe VPC if someone more knowledgeable than I took a look at it and cleaned it up a little... - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a userbox for this project? I can't seem to find it. I clutter my user page with userboxes so I can remember which Wikiprojects I'm interested in :). --Jp07 (talk) 11:15, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
