Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Wikipedia 1.0/Mathematicians

Ratings vs guidelines

The ratings don't seem to follow the guidelines listed at the top. So I fixed some of them. Additionally, Tarski and Turing are definitely "top" according to the guideline. --C S (Talk) 19:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but we have to be careful not to overrate contemporary mathematicians. I reverted your edits mainly for technical reasons, but on reflection I would suggest a more conservative approach to uprating mathematicians importance for the moment. I have made a few minor changes on talk pages myself, but the guidelines at the moment are not very clear, so some more discussion is needed. In particular, I think it is important that we add extra weight to the mathematical side of the contribution. So, while Turing is Top class in many respects (for instance in Computer Science), a High rating in mathematics is not unreasonable, in comparison, say, with Cantor and Godel. Geometry guy 21:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intergration

Hi I was asking if there is anyone who has any intrest in Intergration cause i think i do and its a bit hard for me to find that topic can someone give me a clue to such discussions here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.45.36.250 (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]