Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Peer review

Simultaneous peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review

Since the peer review is getting quite positive use from members of the chemistry wikiproject, I'm including it at Wikipedia:Peer review. There is no fork. Comments from editors approaching these articles from here or WP:PR will edit one single copy, so don't worry. --Rifleman 82 18:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is much better done by transclusion. Meaning, if the person seeking comment wants to cross post to WP:PR, then {{Wikipedia:Peer review/ArticleName}} should be transcluded here. A best practice would also to add a link Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Peer review on the subpage. --mav (talk) 04:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is done by transclusion, just the other way around. But I do see your point. Perhaps when we have other peer reviews in the future.--Rifleman 82 (talk) 08:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time to retire this page?

Regular PRs can be categorized as natsci and Chem PR hasn't been used in months. Therefore I think this page is now redundant and no longer needed. What does anybody else think? If nobody responds saying that this page should be retained, then I will archive its contents and retire it in one month or sometime afterward. --mav (talk) 21:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should be retired. Having multiple peer reviews processes causes confusion IMO, and this one languishes because it is not as well-known as the general peer review process. --Itub (talk) 09:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]