Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brazil/Sports in Brazil task force

Moved Football content

Two conversations that started on this page have been moved in their entirety to the WikiProject Football/Brazil task force talk page. Please continue those conversations there:

Redirect and Disambiguation Project for Brazilian Footballers
Football in Brazil task force

Thanks, giso6150 (talk) 18:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo da Silva Moura

An editor has requested that {{subst:linked|Talk:Leonardo_da_Silva_Moura#Requested_move_2_December_2015}} be moved to {{subst:#if:|{{subst:linked|{{{2}}}}}|another page}}{{subst:#switch: project |user | USER = . Since you had some involvement with 'Talk:Leonardo_da_Silva_Moura#Requested_move_2_December_2015', you |#default = , which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You}} are invited to participate in [[{{subst:#if:|{{subst:#if:|#{{{section}}}|}}|{{subst:#if:|Talk:Leonardo da Silva Moura#{{{section}}}|{{subst:TALKPAGENAME:Talk:Leonardo_da_Silva_Moura#Requested_move_2_December_2015}}}}}}|the move discussion]].

Assistance needed

Hi, I am editing an article, and there are literally dozens of Brazilian news media sources about a fighter, but another editing is saying that because the fighter does not meet MMA guidelines they are not notable. But I insist that the fighter meets WP:GNG guidelines which should trump arbitray mma guidelines. I go into great detail, and provide hyperlinks to google searches of Brazilian magazines Tatame and Gracie Mag as well as broadcast news sources, not to mention the US coverage he has garnered. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Alexandre_Almeida#Coverage_and_notability

Am I off base in my assessment? I don't see how he could be considered not notable due to the dozens of articles around about him from legitimate news sources, and even more from popular American MMA websites. Jumbotron5000 (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Synchronised or synchronized swimming

The categories for Brazil use a mixture of spellings. Please give your view at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 April 23#Synchronised swimming in Brazil. – Fayenatic London 01:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Henrique

Maybe Bruno Henrique should be moved to Bruno Henrique Corsini and Bruno Henrique should be a disambiguation page with Bruno Henrique Corsini, Bruno Henrique Pinto and Bruno Henrique da Silva Souza. Best regards --Diwas (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Anthony Appleyard. Thanks --Diwas (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red online editathon on sports

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathon. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Sports"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 12:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion regarding state league stats at WT:FOOTBALL

Please see this discussion. Hack (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gilberto Silva FAR

I have nominated Gilberto Silva for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Arena Corinthians

Arena Corinthians has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:França#Requested move 6 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:França#Requested move 6 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --MikutoH ^talk! 23:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]