Wikipedia talk:Using foreign images on Wikipedia
Nations without copyright relations with us
[edit]Certain existing nations, including Afghanistan, Bhutan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Nepal, and San Marino presently have no copyright relations with the US. Images published only in those countries could be used without infringing copyright in the US; however, Wikipedia policy is to respect works created in these countries as if they were subject to US copyright.
Hmm, as if they were subject to US copyright? I don't think that's the right way to go about it. Should they join the WTO or accede to the Berne Convention, the URAA will restore copyright in their works . . . but only provided copyright hasn't expired in their home country. If it has, then the works will remain PD in the US, but according to this rule we would still have to respect them. Or if we didn't, their accession would actually release things into the public domain for us, which is silly. I would suggest we only respect their works according to their own laws: that way we're still respecting their copyright, but we remain consistent if/when they do get involved in copyright relations with the US. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 20:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Proposed guideline?
[edit]I don't think this is a proposed guideline, really. It's a description of copyright law. Maybe it should be an essay. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)