Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Licensing/Large

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw

Userboxes

Wikipedia:Userboxes/Licensing/Large is part of WikiProject Userboxes. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as part of the userboxes system. WikiProject Userboxes itself is an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles and templates related to the userbox system, used on many users' pages. We need all your help, so join in today!UserboxesWikipedia:WikiProject UserboxesTemplate:WikiProject UserboxesUserboxes

GNU GPL

Any boxes for dual-license with GNU GPL? If I remember, GPL is not compatible with GFDL directly, so it'd be cool to have a dual-license for that. --H2g2bob 01:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CC 3.0

Now that the 3.0 version of Creative Commons versions are out, it would be nice to see some boxes for them. --Padraic 19:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dual Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License

Dual licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License
I agree to dual-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under the GFDL and the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

I came up with this but I don't know what a template userbox thingy is so here ya go! Apacheguru 04:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

multi-license PD

It is not possible to multi-license a public domain work, as the whole meaning of PD is that the author disclaims any copyright in the work, rendering licenses both useless and unnecessary. For this reason, its use should be discouraged and, after a suitable wait to give people time to switch, the template deleted. T23c (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]