Wikipedia talk:Partial blocks/Noticeboard

Header text

I don't like "Are you the victim of an unfair partial block? You may ask for review here." - it reads to me more like a bad lawyer ad. I'd suggest changing it to something more like "Do you want to contest a partial block?," thoughts? ^creffpublic _{a creffett franchise} (talk to the boss) 14:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Wow, yes, I totally agree. Poor wording; needs changing. So who can we block for phrasing it like that? Nick Moyes (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Header was created by EllenCT (sorry, should have pinged you earlier). Also, to be clear, I'm not trying to insult you by comparing it to a lawyer ad, I just thought it was a funny comparison. ^creffpublic _{a creffett franchise} (talk to the boss) 15:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4a56-OD8YU EllenCT (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear @El C: and @Bbb23:, user Harshil169 has just deleted all my comments on this page. Given that they have accused me of attacking them, lying, etc, and given that they have chosen to split this discussion off from the Administrators Incident Noticeboard, don't you think that this is wrong? I request you to please undo their deletion of my comments on this page. If I do anything improper on this page by all means block me. Otherwise I do believe I have the right to share my views here, especially as it all directly pertains to me. Thanks. -- Jp7311

Also, I hope that you will view this as another act that warrants the block to be reinstated. There should be no world view in which this behavior is acceptable. I am all for constructive editing - especially if the page was found to be promotional etc. But this is FAR from that. I hope you can see through this. They are also doing a similar thing on several other pages, which will all come to light soon. I'm not involved but I am aware of many other ongoing investigations into Harshil169 on other pages as well - for largely the same reasons. Thanks. --Jp7311