| Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
| Examples of lack of consensus or objectivity, or of abuse |
57 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Examples of lack of consensus or objectivity, or of abuse
|
| Downgrade to proposal |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Downgrade to proposal
|
| Official guideline? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Official guideline?
|
| Problematic wording |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Problematic wording
|
| Seems redundant in its current form |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Seems redundant in its current form
|
| Confusing and redundant |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Confusing and redundant
|
| Degrees of notability/importance and article length |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Degrees of notability/importance and article length
|
| Reversion |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Reversion
|
| Notability proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability proposal
|
| Essay |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Essay
|
| First paragraph demonstrates the stupidity of this |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#First paragraph demonstrates the stupidity of this
|
| Incorrect assertation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Incorrect assertation
|
| Requested moves |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Requested moves
|
| Just a bad idea |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Just a bad idea
|
| More subjects need to have 'notability' guidelines |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#More subjects need to have 'notability' guidelines
|
| Oppose this idea |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Oppose this idea
|
| Vehement opposition to this proposed policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Vehement opposition to this proposed policy
|
| All knowledge is notable |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#All knowledge is notable
|
| Notability sub-field proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability sub-field proposal
|
| "notoriety" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#"notoriety"
|
| Subjectivity problem. |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Subjectivity problem.
|
| Notability of authors/books |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability of authors/books
|
| Activity percentile and notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Activity percentile and notability
|
| This is not a guideline, or about to be a guideline |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#This is not a guideline, or about to be a guideline
|
| Notability of buildings |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability of buildings
|
| United States Senate Candidates |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#United States Senate Candidates
|
| New proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#New proposal
|
| Requesting assistance |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Requesting assistance
|
| new notability policy proposed |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#new notability policy proposed
|
| Notability (movies)? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability (movies)?
|
| Notes |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notes
|
| The power of WP |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#The power of WP
|
| Notability for books |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability for books
|
| Institutions are notable? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Institutions are notable?
|
| Notability and deletion |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability and deletion
|
| Related essay on inclusion and notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Related essay on inclusion and notability
|
| non-notability guidline |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#non-notability guidline
|
| Notability and protecting Wikipedia from spam |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability and protecting Wikipedia from spam
|
| High Schools |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#High Schools
|
| Historical persons of note |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Historical persons of note
|
| Should there be no limits to notability? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Should there be no limits to notability?
|
| New additions |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#New additions
|
| How do I deal with articles which are not notable? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#How do I deal with articles which are not notable?
|
| Notability of English football clubs |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Notability of English football clubs
|
| Effect of removing notability standard |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Effect of removing notability standard
|
| Request |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Request
|
| Publications/Periodicals |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Publications/Periodicals
|
| AfD of note |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#AfD of note
|
| Schools |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Schools
|
| Just curious |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Just curious
|
| Inclusion(?) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Inclusion(?)
|
| Note on verifiability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 1#Note on verifiability
|
| Splitting off with a bare, accurate guideline or policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Splitting off with a bare, accurate guideline or policy
|
| Descriptiveness |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Descriptiveness
|
| Differences between this and past proposals |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Differences between this and past proposals
|
| Move this proposal |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Move this proposal
|
| Rigorous definition? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Rigorous definition?
|
| Out of process guideline? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Out of process guideline?
|
| Guideline? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Guideline?
|
| Rationale |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Rationale
|
| This notability essay/proposal has disruptive effects |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#This notability essay/proposal has disruptive effects
|
| Food |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Food
|
| Accurate description? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Accurate description?
|
| Consensus |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Consensus
|
| Restoring previous content |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Restoring previous content
|
| Television |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Television
|
| Compromise? |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Compromise?
|
| Poll you may be interested in... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Poll you may be interested in...
|
| One last attempt at cooling things down |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#One last attempt at cooling things down
|
| Official policy? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Official policy?
|
| Restarting a calm discussion |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Restarting a calm discussion
|
| Churches, mosques, synagogues, etc |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Churches, mosques, synagogues, etc
|
| Hiways |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 2#Hiways
|
| Hmm... |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Hmm...
|
| Personal essay |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Personal essay
|
| "Encyclopedic" content |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#"Encyclopedic" content
|
| Notability & NPOV |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Notability & NPOV
|
| Notability as definite criterion? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Notability as definite criterion?
|
| A Proposition: Notability, alone, is no reason to delete a page |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#A Proposition: Notability, alone, is no reason to delete a page
|
| Sports |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Sports
|
| Should notability be a guideline? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Should notability be a guideline?
|
| Wikipedia popularity |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Wikipedia popularity
|
| What is notability? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#What is notability?
|
| Need for good hard definition, and a brief proposal |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Need for good hard definition, and a brief proposal
|
| long-standing lack of consensus |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#long-standing lack of consensus
|
| guideline header? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#guideline header?
|
| Notability as "subjective" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Notability as "subjective"
|
| About the possible merge |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#About the possible merge
|
| About the merge sign |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#About the merge sign
|
| Notability tag on Claud Jacob |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Notability tag on Claud Jacob
|
| revert war over |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#revert war over
|
| Wording notice |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Wording notice
|
| Yet another challenge to the guideline status |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 3#Yet another challenge to the guideline status
|
| Deleting article on notability is stupid |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Deleting article on notability is stupid
|
| Why I keep pushing for this to be "policy". |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Why I keep pushing for this to be "policy".
|
| Merger |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Merger
|
| Could this be inaccurate/misleading/etc.? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Could this be inaccurate/misleading/etc.?
|
| Recent changes |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Recent changes
|
| Why so much debate? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Why so much debate?
|
| Can a criminal be classified as a notable person? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Can a criminal be classified as a notable person?
|
| This should stay a guideline... |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#This should stay a guideline...
|
| Notability guidelines are missing many important criteria |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Notability guidelines are missing many important criteria
|
| Noticeability instead |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Noticeability instead
|
| Aggregation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Aggregation
|
| Consensus check? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Consensus check?
|
| A little more fuel for the fire? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#A little more fuel for the fire?
|
| What do "non-trivial" and "independent" mean? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#What do "non-trivial" and "independent" mean?
|
| Bias |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Bias
|
| Simplify, Simplify, simplify |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Simplify, Simplify, simplify
|
| Widely varying standards |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Widely varying standards
|
| The wisdom of the merge/rewrite |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#The wisdom of the merge/rewrite
|
| Notability is just verifiability wrapped in enigma |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Notability is just verifiability wrapped in enigma
|
| The difference between notability and verifiability |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#The difference between notability and verifiability
|
| Disputes NOT resolved |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Disputes NOT resolved
|
| Re: Werdnabot archival |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#Re: Werdnabot archival
|
| The problem with notability |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 4#The problem with notability
|
| Topic resurrections for closure |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Topic resurrections for closure
|
| Three key points... |
68 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Three key points...
|
| Just for the record... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Just for the record...
|
| Radiant's revert |
48 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Radiant's revert
|
| Notability as a reason for inclusion |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Notability as a reason for inclusion
|
| Mising Link |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Mising Link
|
| Some of the problems with WP:N |
167 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Some of the problems with WP:N
|
| Deletion |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Deletion
|
| Wikipedians referencing a source that borrowed misinformation indirectly from Wikipedia |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Wikipedians referencing a source that borrowed misinformation indirectly from Wikipedia
|
| Notability should be a criterion for neutrality |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#Notability should be a criterion for neutrality
|
| 'See also' section improvement |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 5#'See also' section improvement
|
| The "one of the more contentious issues" deletion |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#The "one of the more contentious issues" deletion
|
| Multiple non-trivial sources? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Multiple non-trivial sources?
|
| Change it back? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Change it back?
|
| Consensus building attempt |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Consensus building attempt
|
| Real world example in favor of WP:N? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Real world example in favor of WP:N?
|
| Washington Post article |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Washington Post article
|
| I'm done. |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#I'm done.
|
| Notability in AfD |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Notability in AfD
|
| Moving forward: History |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Moving forward: History
|
| Notability and the 'it is on a non-English Wikipedia' test |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Notability and the 'it is on a non-English Wikipedia' test
|
| historically fluid |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#historically fluid
|
| Wikiproject Notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Wikiproject Notability
|
| Dumb and confusing typo of mine in Edit History |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Dumb and confusing typo of mine in Edit History
|
| Notability cannot decrease. |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Notability cannot decrease.
|
| Consensus cannot change notability |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Consensus cannot change notability
|
| "Loss of source" issue |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#"Loss of source" issue
|
| Statement of purpose? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Statement of purpose?
|
| Subjectivity, objectivity and tangibility |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#Subjectivity, objectivity and tangibility
|
| It's not clear to me that this means anything at all |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#It's not clear to me that this means anything at all
|
| The Rationale |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 6#The Rationale
|
| Moved |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Moved
|
| GT |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#GT
|
| WP:N vs. WP:DEL et al. |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#WP:N vs. WP:DEL et al.
|
| E-media |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#E-media
|
| Change notability to be about information |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Change notability to be about information
|
| Misnomer and Exempt Stubs |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Misnomer and Exempt Stubs
|
| Real Problems with Notability. |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Real Problems with Notability.
|
| School newspapers |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#School newspapers
|
| Published=reliable? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Published=reliable?
|
| Restored disputed flag |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Restored disputed flag
|
| Proposed change to notability guideline |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Proposed change to notability guideline
|
| What are the notability requirements for films? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#What are the notability requirements for films?
|
| Permanence |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Permanence
|
| Is a very long article about a minor controversy a violation of of the notability guideline? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Is a very long article about a minor controversy a violation of of the notability guideline?
|
| A question about notability of articles VS notability of statements. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#A question about notability of articles VS notability of statements.
|
| Proposed change to notability guideline - Google Hits |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Proposed change to notability guideline - Google Hits
|
| Reliable sources? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Reliable sources?
|
| Language page: Svenska |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Language page: Svenska
|
| Scope of notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Scope of notability
|
| Across Languages |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Across Languages
|
| Questions regarding the "primary notability criterion" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Questions regarding the "primary notability criterion"
|
| Can.. |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Can..
|
| Fame isn't a measure of notability? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Fame isn't a measure of notability?
|
| Why the direct subject of published sources? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 7#Why the direct subject of published sources?
|
| Notability is subjective |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Notability is subjective
|
| Notability of elements within articles |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Notability of elements within articles
|
| Newsworthiness |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Newsworthiness
|
| College newspapers and notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#College newspapers and notability
|
| Notability of online petitions? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Notability of online petitions?
|
| Let's discuss the relationship between primary notability criterion and other criteria |
68 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Let's discuss the relationship between primary notability criterion and other criteria
|
| Proposed change |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Proposed change
|
| Should notability be mentioned in the new page template? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Should notability be mentioned in the new page template?
|
| Notability of buildings and structures |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Notability of buildings and structures
|
| moving this more in line with intent |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#moving this more in line with intent
|
| Non-notable web pages becoming notable? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Non-notable web pages becoming notable?
|
| 'Notability as central criterion' revisited |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#'Notability as central criterion' revisited
|
| Notability in deletion and merge disputes |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 8#Notability in deletion and merge disputes
|
| New proposed guideline: Wikipedia:Notability (news) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#New proposed guideline: Wikipedia:Notability (news)
|
| Chinese version policy discussion |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Chinese version policy discussion
|
| Wikinfo AfD |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Wikinfo AfD
|
| Notability - Why Wikipedia? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Notability - Why Wikipedia?
|
| An objective method to evaluate notability |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#An objective method to evaluate notability
|
| Should WP:BK be made a guideline? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Should WP:BK be made a guideline?
|
| Clarification suggestion to wording |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Clarification suggestion to wording
|
| Or is it? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Or is it?
|
| Biographies -- notability |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Biographies -- notability
|
| Is it really primary? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Is it really primary?
|
| Multiple references counted as one |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Multiple references counted as one
|
| Emphasis on precedent |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Emphasis on precedent
|
| Does "notability" apply to the content of articles? |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Does "notability" apply to the content of articles?
|
| ...what if the subject is notable in another language but not in English? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#...what if the subject is notable in another language but not in English?
|
| Illogical conclusions |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Illogical conclusions
|
| Rethinking the first sentence |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Rethinking the first sentence
|
| Reordering First Paragraphs |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Reordering First Paragraphs
|
| The following is a bogus sentence |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#The following is a bogus sentence
|
| Wikipedia:Notabilty (artists) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Wikipedia:Notabilty (artists)
|
| Is subjective |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Is subjective
|
| The "primary" criterion in relation to WP:V |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#The "primary" criterion in relation to WP:V
|
| Revisiting the discussion above |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Revisiting the discussion above
|
| Crackpot science using patent as disguise |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Crackpot science using patent as disguise
|
| Centrality re-revisited |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Centrality re-revisited
|
| "multiple, non-trivial" -> "sufficient" |
57 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#"multiple, non-trivial" -> "sufficient"
|
| Notability = Noteworthiness ? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Notability = Noteworthiness ?
|
| woops - I think I made a small edit without seeking approval |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#woops - I think I made a small edit without seeking approval
|
| "In-depth" versus "non-trivial" |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#"In-depth" versus "non-trivial"
|
| Problems with recent changes |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Problems with recent changes
|
| N/A to article-content (continued) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#N/A to article-content (continued)
|
| N/A to article-content (continued) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#N/A to article-content (continued) 2
|
| Disputed |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Disputed
|
| A topic is notable if it has sufficient, independent works that are reliable and can act as the basis for an encyclopedic article. |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#A topic is notable if it has sufficient, independent works that are reliable and can act as the basis for an encyclopedic article.
|
| Downgraded to proposal |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Downgraded to proposal
|
| This wording doesn't require anything |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#This wording doesn't require anything
|
| "A single significant work could demonstrate notabilty" |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#"A single significant work could demonstrate notabilty"
|
| Are there better words than "non-trivial? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Are there better words than "non-trivial?
|
| Primary -> General |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 9#Primary -> General
|
| Notability overview |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Notability overview
|
| Slate article |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Slate article
|
| Notability guidlines |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Notability guidlines
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (academics) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Wikipedia:Notability (academics)
|
| Courtesy notice: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Notability (films) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Courtesy notice: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Notability (films)
|
| Should sources be in the English language? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Should sources be in the English language?
|
| Modifying independence |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Modifying independence
|
| "At least one substantial" source |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#"At least one substantial" source
|
| Mass tagging of guidelines and proposals as "Rejected" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Mass tagging of guidelines and proposals as "Rejected"
|
| Changes to "Rationale" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Changes to "Rationale"
|
| Disputed tag |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Disputed tag
|
| spelling and other indicators of disorganization |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#spelling and other indicators of disorganization
|
| A new start with a new goal |
87 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#A new start with a new goal
|
| Protection |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Protection
|
| Consensus about Wikipedia:Notability? |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Consensus about Wikipedia:Notability?
|
| Just a thought |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Just a thought
|
| Induction vs. Deduction / Subjective (Dis)Like |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Induction vs. Deduction / Subjective (Dis)Like
|
| Straw Poll |
95 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Straw Poll
|
| Let's start a categorization |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Let's start a categorization
|
| Stubs |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Stubs
|
| New measure for notability |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#New measure for notability
|
| Sports Personalities |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Sports Personalities
|
| Wikipedia:Availability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Wikipedia:Availability
|
| Will our readers be interested? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Will our readers be interested?
|
| What's the point in this debate? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#What's the point in this debate?
|
| The one thing we seem to agree on... |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#The one thing we seem to agree on...
|
| please put up yiddish interwiki link |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#please put up yiddish interwiki link
|
| Rewrite this page completely. |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Rewrite this page completely.
|
| Notability criterion should involve sourcing? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Notability criterion should involve sourcing?
|
| Can't find info online proves what? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Can't find info online proves what?
|
| Fundamental misunderstanding of consensus |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Fundamental misunderstanding of consensus
|
| I still don't get it |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#I still don't get it
|
| Student Newspapers |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Student Newspapers
|
| Encyclopedicity instead of notability? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Encyclopedicity instead of notability?
|
| Straw poll #2 |
70 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Straw poll #2
|
| Encyclopedic suitability |
68 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Encyclopedic suitability
|
| Werdnabot |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Werdnabot
|
| Why do you keep deleting my things? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Why do you keep deleting my things?
|
| The problem |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#The problem
|
| Notability is a term of art meaning "worthy of being included in the Wikipedia" |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Notability is a term of art meaning "worthy of being included in the Wikipedia"
|
| Notability = verifiability |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Notability = verifiability
|
| Protection |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Protection 2
|
| re: Notability is generally permanent |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#re: Notability is generally permanent
|
| A good line of thought? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#A good line of thought?
|
| Possibly a different meaning is desired |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Possibly a different meaning is desired
|
| Footnotes |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Footnotes
|
| Current news events |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Current news events
|
| A second notice... |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#A second notice...
|
| Current status |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Current status
|
| Food Notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Food Notability
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (science) should this be a guideline? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Wikipedia:Notability (science) should this be a guideline?
|
| "Non-triviality" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#"Non-triviality"
|
| Notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Notability
|
| Disputed |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Disputed
|
| New Lead paragraphs |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#New Lead paragraphs
|
| Require addition: English based |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Require addition: English based
|
| It is not measured by editors’ subjective judgment. |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#It is not measured by editors’ subjective judgment.
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)
|
| Historic houses |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Historic houses
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors) |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors)
|
| Subsidiary Notability and Articles for Deletion |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Subsidiary Notability and Articles for Deletion
|
| Definition of "non-trivial" |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Definition of "non-trivial"
|
| Primary (but not sole) criterion |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Primary (but not sole) criterion
|
| School notability |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#School notability
|
| Inherent notability? |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Inherent notability?
|
| Computer Command notability? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Computer Command notability?
|
| Multiple sources |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Multiple sources
|
| Why we should avoid "inherent notability" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Why we should avoid "inherent notability"
|
| Typo in the menu |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Typo in the menu
|
| Consensus? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Consensus?
|
| Strawpoll at WT:AI |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Strawpoll at WT:AI
|
| Wikipedia :Notability (films) |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Wikipedia :Notability (films)
|
| Unilaterally editing guidelines |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Unilaterally editing guidelines
|
| Disputed status tag |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Disputed status tag
|
| Primary notability criterion |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Primary notability criterion
|
| Template:pnc |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Template:pnc
|
| Proposed Addition - Crap Exist |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Proposed Addition - Crap Exist
|
| merge from Wikipedia:Notability (people) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#merge from Wikipedia:Notability (people)
|
| single/multiple source |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#single/multiple source
|
| Primary, General, Central or Main |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Primary, General, Central or Main
|
| Analyzing the status quo at the various sub-guidelines |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Analyzing the status quo at the various sub-guidelines
|
| Do we really need Notability Guidelines? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Do we really need Notability Guidelines?
|
| importance-s template |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#importance-s template
|
| Beating the dead horse of wording |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Beating the dead horse of wording
|
| "Asserting" notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#"Asserting" notability
|
| Two or more |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Two or more
|
| Constructive compromise |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Constructive compromise
|
| Sufficiency |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Sufficiency
|
| Reflections ... |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Reflections ...
|
| Internet forum notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Internet forum notability
|
| Single source establishing notabilty |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Single source establishing notabilty
|
| Question |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Question
|
| Logistics of using the template at sub-pages |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Logistics of using the template at sub-pages
|
| Trying to cut through the distractions and reach a conclusion |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Trying to cut through the distractions and reach a conclusion
|
| Notability of individual athletic competitions (games) |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Notability of individual athletic competitions (games)
|
| Notability infrastructure |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Notability infrastructure
|
| Chart Logistics Discussion |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 10#Chart Logistics Discussion
|
| Charting the discussion |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Charting the discussion
|
| Summary of recent points of view |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Summary of recent points of view
|
| N/A to article-content (again) |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#N/A to article-content (again)
|
| not a guideline; essay is appropriate |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#not a guideline; essay is appropriate
|
| Template:pnc nominated for deletion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Template:pnc nominated for deletion
|
| Attempt number #424 |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Attempt number #424
|
| Wikipedia:Television episodes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Wikipedia:Television episodes
|
| Sufficient? Necessary? Both? |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Sufficient? Necessary? Both?
|
| Nutshell |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Nutshell
|
| "reliable" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#"reliable"
|
| Unpublished Texts |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Unpublished Texts
|
| A different view |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#A different view
|
| Dispute at Wikipedia:Television episodes |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Dispute at Wikipedia:Television episodes
|
| Political parties |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Political parties
|
| Notability for murder victims |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 11#Notability for murder victims
|
| "The" criterion? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#"The" criterion?
|
| Guideline status |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Guideline status
|
| I'm Concerned about losing good articles |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#I'm Concerned about losing good articles
|
| Lists of Victims |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Lists of Victims
|
| The PNC is not well-written |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#The PNC is not well-written
|
| Proposed policy change at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Proposed policy change at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
|
| Substantial? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Substantial?
|
| "Coverage" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#"Coverage"
|
| Student Newspapers |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Student Newspapers
|
| Tigerman |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Tigerman
|
| Disputed wording or inclusion of the notability criterion |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Disputed wording or inclusion of the notability criterion
|
| Merge WP:NEO to Manual of style |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Merge WP:NEO to Manual of style
|
| Considering primary sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Considering primary sources
|
| Trying to help |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Trying to help
|
| Notability of lists |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Notability of lists
|
| Relisting proposal, to attract more comments |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Relisting proposal, to attract more comments
|
| Someone Disagrees With This Policy |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Someone Disagrees With This Policy
|
| Independent+non trivial? Debretts, Whos Who etc |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Independent+non trivial? Debretts, Whos Who etc
|
| Moving forward |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Moving forward
|
| A topic is notable if others have considered it worthy of note. Is that objective? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#A topic is notable if others have considered it worthy of note. Is that objective?
|
| Trying to tie things together |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Trying to tie things together
|
| Request for Comment: Gere letter about marriage notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Request for Comment: Gere letter about marriage notability
|
| A topic is (sufficiently?) notable if |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#A topic is (sufficiently?) notable if
|
| A fresh start? |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#A fresh start?
|
| Get rid of the notability system? Or make it official policy? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Get rid of the notability system? Or make it official policy?
|
| Notability is generally permanent |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Notability is generally permanent
|
| Proposal - second notice |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Proposal - second notice
|
| Student newspapers/magazines |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Student newspapers/magazines
|
| Renaming |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Renaming
|
| What is required of a news event in order for it to be considered notable enough for inclusion in Wikipeda rather than Wikinews? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#What is required of a news event in order for it to be considered notable enough for inclusion in Wikipeda rather than Wikinews?
|
| Understand |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 12#Understand
|
| Proposed language and outstanding issues |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Proposed language and outstanding issues
|
| Bureaucratese alert |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Bureaucratese alert
|
| Help:Creating policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Help:Creating policy
|
| Fuel for the fire |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Fuel for the fire
|
| Notability of geographical articles |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Notability of geographical articles
|
| Subjectivity |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Subjectivity
|
| what's disputed? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#what's disputed?
|
| The Notability Guideline seems to trump Common Sense. |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#The Notability Guideline seems to trump Common Sense.
|
| Simplification |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Simplification
|
| Revised proposal |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Revised proposal
|
| Bias toward Internet sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Bias toward Internet sources
|
| Disputed tag |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Disputed tag
|
| Taking the plunge |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Taking the plunge
|
| The rewrite is a bad idea |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#The rewrite is a bad idea
|
| Prescriptive deletion? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Prescriptive deletion?
|
| Renaming, again |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Renaming, again
|
| Problems with rewrite |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Problems with rewrite
|
| Why change? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Why change?
|
| "Significant"-->"substantive" |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#"Significant"-->"substantive"
|
| Objective/Subjective again |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Objective/Subjective again
|
| BLOAT |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#BLOAT
|
| Kudos! |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 13#Kudos!
|
| Conversely, a topic may be covered in multiple sources and still be only of purely local or temporary interest. |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Conversely, a topic may be covered in multiple sources and still be only of purely local or temporary interest.
|
| Wikipedia:Notability *Abolish It* |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Wikipedia:Notability *Abolish It*
|
| Objective evidence section |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Objective evidence section
|
| Secondary sources are essential in judging notability |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Secondary sources are essential in judging notability
|
| Projects relying on primary sources |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Projects relying on primary sources
|
| Uncle G Essay |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Uncle G Essay
|
| Some Subjects are inherently Notable |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Some Subjects are inherently Notable
|
| General notability... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#General notability...
|
| We need to change this regarding crime coverage |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#We need to change this regarding crime coverage
|
| Point system for article inclusion NOT notability alone. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Point system for article inclusion NOT notability alone.
|
| Benefit of the Doubt |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 14#Benefit of the Doubt
|
| "Wikipedia activism" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#"Wikipedia activism"
|
| A topic is presumed to be notable |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#A topic is presumed to be notable
|
| Presumed to be notable |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Presumed to be notable
|
| Rationale |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Rationale
|
| Decision on Wikipedia:Notability (films) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Decision on Wikipedia:Notability (films)
|
| Question for the regulars here |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Question for the regulars here
|
| A linux guideline |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#A linux guideline
|
| It's not a purely subjective judgment... |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#It's not a purely subjective judgment...
|
| Deletion review Kari Schull et al |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Deletion review Kari Schull et al
|
| Notability of local elections |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Notability of local elections
|
| Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability
|
| Let's give our power away? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Let's give our power away?
|
| Lists require notable entries |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Lists require notable entries
|
| WHAT |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#WHAT
|
| Lists |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Lists
|
| Visual Arts Notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Visual Arts Notability
|
| Jimmy Wales' claimed goal contradicted by this page |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Jimmy Wales' claimed goal contradicted by this page
|
| Notability as encyclopedic |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Notability as encyclopedic
|
| Reliable or Reputable |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Reliable or Reputable
|
| Abolish the Notability Guidline |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Abolish the Notability Guidline
|
| Intersting case for WP:N: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Knight |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Intersting case for WP:N: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Knight
|
| This S*xx! |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#This S*xx!
|
| Software |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Software
|
| Towards a definition of notability, for Wikipedia purposes |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Towards a definition of notability, for Wikipedia purposes
|
| Notability is not temporary -> reword this |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Notability is not temporary -> reword this
|
| Wikipedia:Inherently notable |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Wikipedia:Inherently notable
|
| What is notability for an exercise? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#What is notability for an exercise?
|
| Weaken the Notability policy |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Weaken the Notability policy
|
| Community or centralized media? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Community or centralized media?
|
| Primary notability criterion - where is it? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Primary notability criterion - where is it?
|
| A question from Retrev |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#A question from Retrev
|
| "sufficiently notable" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#"sufficiently notable"
|
| Notability and Online Games |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Notability and Online Games
|
| Notability for Commercial Company |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Notability for Commercial Company
|
| Notability and Muds |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 15#Notability and Muds
|
| Korea Bronze Star List |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Korea Bronze Star List
|
| Notability guidelines for beliefs, psuedoscience or superstitions |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Notability guidelines for beliefs, psuedoscience or superstitions
|
| Long Term Notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Long Term Notability
|
| Exception to Notability for Student Editors (kids)? Or not? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Exception to Notability for Student Editors (kids)? Or not?
|
| Everything is notable |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Everything is notable
|
| What are "independent sources" |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#What are "independent sources"
|
| Political parties |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Political parties
|
| WP:N reform ... long overdue? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#WP:N reform ... long overdue?
|
| New Bot |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#New Bot
|
| Congratulations! |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Congratulations!
|
| Notability of Fiction |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Notability of Fiction
|
| Notability of journalists |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Notability of journalists
|
| I propose to cancel this "notabilty" thing |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#I propose to cancel this "notabilty" thing
|
| Proposal to stop deleting non-notable content |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Proposal to stop deleting non-notable content
|
| Lists |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Lists
|
| Notability Killed the Wikipedia Noob |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Notability Killed the Wikipedia Noob
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (Reality Television participants) |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Wikipedia:Notability (Reality Television participants)
|
| Serious problems with this concept. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Serious problems with this concept.
|
| Wikipedia talk:Notability (years) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#Wikipedia talk:Notability (years)
|
| The clarification of WP:N and a correlated reduction of misuse at AfD? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 16#The clarification of WP:N and a correlated reduction of misuse at AfD?
|
| New shortcut, WP:NNC, for "Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content" |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#New shortcut, WP:NNC, for "Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content"
|
| Where would be a good place |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Where would be a good place
|
| Inherent notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Inherent notability
|
| Policy or guideline? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Policy or guideline?
|
| Proving that a subject is non-notable |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Proving that a subject is non-notable
|
| The function of an encyclopedia |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#The function of an encyclopedia
|
| Biased |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Biased
|
| Wikipedia:Inherent notabilty |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Wikipedia:Inherent notabilty
|
| Reason for this "guideline" being so strict |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Reason for this "guideline" being so strict
|
| Where to discuss notability? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Where to discuss notability?
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (religious figures) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Wikipedia:Notability (religious figures)
|
| Instruction creep |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Instruction creep
|
| Merge proposal |
108 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Merge proposal
|
| Policy rewrite proposed |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Policy rewrite proposed
|
| Does notability degrade? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Does notability degrade?
|
| Rename the notability guideline |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Rename the notability guideline
|
| Notability of skyscrapers and structures (existing and future, including canceled projects) |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Notability of skyscrapers and structures (existing and future, including canceled projects)
|
| Proposal for synchronization of common content |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Proposal for synchronization of common content
|
| Page hits |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Page hits
|
| Notability Vaguness |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Notability Vaguness
|
| Loosen up a bit? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Loosen up a bit?
|
| When to use the Notability tag and when the Refimprove tag |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#When to use the Notability tag and when the Refimprove tag
|
| Presumption |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Presumption
|
| Definition required? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Definition required?
|
| notability in a fictional content |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#notability in a fictional content
|
| WP:NOT? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#WP:NOT?
|
| PORNBIO - merge to BIO |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#PORNBIO - merge to BIO
|
| Notability criteria reform — progress |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Notability criteria reform — progress
|
| status of page |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#status of page
|
| Places? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Places?
|
| WP:MUSIC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#WP:MUSIC
|
| Non-english topics |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Non-english topics
|
| Better Defined Notability Criterion |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Better Defined Notability Criterion
|
| What is Notable? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#What is Notable?
|
| Bishops |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Bishops
|
| What about a notability guideline for television shows? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#What about a notability guideline for television shows?
|
| Exceptions to notability requirements |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Exceptions to notability requirements
|
| Notability is never inherent? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Notability is never inherent?
|
| SEMI |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#SEMI
|
| Unnecessary? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Unnecessary?
|
| Semi-notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Semi-notability
|
| Criticism |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Criticism
|
| Proposing a few informal guideline for Notability Tagging |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Proposing a few informal guideline for Notability Tagging
|
| Rebuttable presumption? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Rebuttable presumption?
|
| Notability Policy is a Red Herring - Unecessary and Detrimental |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Notability Policy is a Red Herring - Unecessary and Detrimental
|
| Notability as part of Topic not Article |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Notability as part of Topic not Article
|
| Most Common Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Most Common Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines
|
| Why Have it? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Why Have it?
|
| Notability & Schools |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Notability & Schools
|
| Non-english sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Non-english sources
|
| Existence/non-existence |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Existence/non-existence
|
| Centrx’s reversion |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Centrx’s reversion
|
| WP:FICT |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#WP:FICT
|
| General Issues |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#General Issues
|
| Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines
|
| Notability guideline page for schools? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Notability guideline page for schools?
|
| Change recommendation for adding a date to Template:Notability? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#Change recommendation for adding a date to Template:Notability?
|
| "Rationale" section |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 18#"Rationale" section
|
| The "Rationale" section |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#The "Rationale" section
|
| Two examples |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Two examples
|
| Proposal for rationale section |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Proposal for rationale section
|
| Conflict between WP:N and WP:V? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Conflict between WP:N and WP:V?
|
| New notability guideline proposal: Poker players |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#New notability guideline proposal: Poker players
|
| Problem |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Problem
|
| Hole in Bio |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Hole in Bio
|
| Surnames |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Surnames
|
| Martial arts |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Martial arts
|
| Too many redundant stubs |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Too many redundant stubs
|
| Nutshell removal |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Nutshell removal
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (media) fizzled out |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Wikipedia:Notability (media) fizzled out
|
| Primary/secondary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Primary/secondary sources
|
| A proposal to split WP:N and WP:SIGNIF |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#A proposal to split WP:N and WP:SIGNIF
|
| WP:N and a school's alumni |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#WP:N and a school's alumni
|
| Notability and size splits |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Notability and size splits
|
| Purpose |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Purpose
|
| Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines is being changed without consensus |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines is being changed without consensus
|
| Secondary sources requirement reduces number of BLP articles |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Secondary sources requirement reduces number of BLP articles
|
| AFD example based on notability and size splits |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#AFD example based on notability and size splits
|
| Defining notability |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Defining notability
|
| "Notability is not temporary" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#"Notability is not temporary"
|
| NNC and lists |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#NNC and lists
|
| Importance vs. notability |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Importance vs. notability
|
| Geographical articles - and notability - again |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Geographical articles - and notability - again
|
| Fawlty Towers |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Fawlty Towers
|
| Please review proposed WP:FICT guideline |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Please review proposed WP:FICT guideline
|
| Daniel Martin (Scholar) |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Daniel Martin (Scholar)
|
| Centralized TV Episode Discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Centralized TV Episode Discussion
|
| Notability for new article stubs |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Notability for new article stubs
|
| Would someone take a look at this page |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Would someone take a look at this page
|
| Citizen journalism category |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Citizen journalism category
|
| Notability of places? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Notability of places?
|
| WP:DEGRADE |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#WP:DEGRADE
|
| The deal with secondary sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#The deal with secondary sources
|
| Does he qualify? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Does he qualify?
|
| Lords Of Zeroah. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Lords Of Zeroah.
|
| Guidelines |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Guidelines
|
| Why? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#Why? 2
|
| This guideline violates the no original research policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 19#This guideline violates the no original research policy
|
| Secondary sources |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Secondary sources
|
| notability exceptions? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#notability exceptions?
|
| Gama Prasad Agarwalla |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Gama Prasad Agarwalla
|
| Timothy Goes to School |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Timothy Goes to School
|
| Notability is really a policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Notability is really a policy
|
| Template for Response to Non Notable Material |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Template for Response to Non Notable Material
|
| Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines
|
| Request for comment on merge discussion |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Request for comment on merge discussion
|
| Notability and Wikias |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Notability and Wikias
|
| Nerds |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Nerds
|
| Notability being a free pass |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Notability being a free pass
|
| Please comment on proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Please comment on proposal
|
| Wikipedia:Notability#Notability is not temporary |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Wikipedia:Notability#Notability is not temporary
|
| WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN YOUR ARTICLE KEEPS GETTING DELETED |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN YOUR ARTICLE KEEPS GETTING DELETED
|
| Please Protect this Page |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Please Protect this Page
|
| Citing articles for notability that serve no other purpose in the article |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Citing articles for notability that serve no other purpose in the article
|
| Every Buddhist temple in the world? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Every Buddhist temple in the world?
|
| Notability - good or bad? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Notability - good or bad?
|
| span tag with id="CONTENT" does not work correctly |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#span tag with id="CONTENT" does not work correctly
|
| What constitutes notability evidence? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#What constitutes notability evidence?
|
| On what can be loosened (if any) in the subguidelines |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#On what can be loosened (if any) in the subguidelines
|
| Major metro and politicians |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Major metro and politicians
|
| Eh? Notability is (still) a guideline? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Eh? Notability is (still) a guideline?
|
| Time to affect the merger of Academics with BIO |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Time to affect the merger of Academics with BIO
|
| "Notability is not temporary" is self contradictory |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#"Notability is not temporary" is self contradictory
|
| Too many words . . . |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Too many words . . .
|
| Arrogant definition |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Arrogant definition
|
| Notability: Belief Systems |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Notability: Belief Systems
|
| Troublesome loophole |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Troublesome loophole
|
| Why do people come to Wikipedia ? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Why do people come to Wikipedia ?
|
| Notability is not inherited |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Notability is not inherited
|
| Proposed addition |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Proposed addition
|
| Are siblings notable enough for inclusion on an article? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Are siblings notable enough for inclusion on an article?
|
| Get rid of it |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Get rid of it
|
| Loosen the rule |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Loosen the rule
|
| The Key Difference Please |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#The Key Difference Please
|
| Notability Guideline PROPOSALS are being used like real guidelines! |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Notability Guideline PROPOSALS are being used like real guidelines!
|
| Biographicon: crowd-sourcing non-notables |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#Biographicon: crowd-sourcing non-notables
|
| New Topic - TitleZ.com data as a measure of notability ? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#New Topic - TitleZ.com data as a measure of notability ?
|
| What do encyclopedias are for ? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 20#What do encyclopedias are for ?
|
| Discussion about notability of politicians at WT:BIO |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Discussion about notability of politicians at WT:BIO
|
| Notability in articles on legal cases |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Notability in articles on legal cases
|
| "Presumed" |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#"Presumed"
|
| Disambiguation and notability |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Disambiguation and notability
|
| What Notability rules govern this situation? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#What Notability rules govern this situation?
|
| Needed expansion |
82 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Needed expansion
|
| Presumed |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Presumed
|
| WP:WEB |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#WP:WEB
|
| Janice Lee Allen |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Janice Lee Allen
|
| Who should decide what is notable? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Who should decide what is notable?
|
| Deciding notability of redlinks... |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Deciding notability of redlinks...
|
| Picking over the remains of WP:N/CA |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Picking over the remains of WP:N/CA
|
| Notability policy is stupid |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Notability policy is stupid
|
| Consensus Question |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Consensus Question
|
| Newspapers and notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Newspapers and notability
|
| Multilingual notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Multilingual notability
|
| Qualifying when notability does not apply |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Qualifying when notability does not apply
|
| Quotations |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 21#Quotations
|
| Notability of software (particularly FOSS) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Notability of software (particularly FOSS)
|
| "Presumed," again |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#"Presumed," again
|
| What Do You Think Of My Revision? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#What Do You Think Of My Revision?
|
| The Google Test |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#The Google Test
|
| Improvements Needed |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Improvements Needed
|
| Does notability have geographical boundries? |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Does notability have geographical boundries?
|
| Notability of video game sub-articles |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Notability of video game sub-articles
|
| Notability within articles? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Notability within articles?
|
| New criterion for notability? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#New criterion for notability?
|
| Notability guidelines DO affect article content |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Notability guidelines DO affect article content
|
| Notability Is Temporary |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Notability Is Temporary
|
| WP:FICT |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#WP:FICT
|
| Notability, the GNG, subject specific guidelines, and definition, characterisation, or evidence? |
114 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#Notability, the GNG, subject specific guidelines, and definition, characterisation, or evidence?
|
| Notability - a free pass, or an indication? |
61 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Notability - a free pass, or an indication?
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Wikipedia:Attribution
|
| Why is not WP:NOTE policy? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#Why is not WP:NOTE policy?
|
| "but do not specifically regulate the content of articles" |
64 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#"but do not specifically regulate the content of articles"
|
| Creep |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 22#Creep
|
| Barebones simplification of WP:N -- Take the "notability challenge" |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#Barebones simplification of WP:N -- Take the "notability challenge"
|
| Discussion on the modified wording? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#Discussion on the modified wording?
|
| Multiple sources in Presumed paragraph |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#Multiple sources in Presumed paragraph
|
| List of Proposed changes |
231 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#List of Proposed changes
|
| More discussion on the changes I tried to make. |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#More discussion on the changes I tried to make.
|
| WP:NTEMP vs WP:NOT#NEWS |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#WP:NTEMP vs WP:NOT#NEWS
|
| Can specific topic guidelines be more inclusive? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 23#Can specific topic guidelines be more inclusive?
|
| Notaility in English |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Notaility in English
|
| Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters
|
| Please Quantify Notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Please Quantify Notability
|
| What would be useful |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#What would be useful
|
| Move to mark Notability as "historical" as Verifiability is sufficient for determining inclusion in a paperless encyclopedia |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Move to mark Notability as "historical" as Verifiability is sufficient for determining inclusion in a paperless encyclopedia
|
| A more serious proposal |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#A more serious proposal
|
| Another proposal |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Another proposal
|
| Ganglands deletion? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Ganglands deletion?
|
| Look, we've got to clear up this contradiction |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Look, we've got to clear up this contradiction
|
| Superfluous |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Superfluous
|
| Term of art vs. common usage |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Term of art vs. common usage
|
| Questions about notability of articles |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Questions about notability of articles
|
| Links to userspace essays |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 24#Links to userspace essays
|
| The Futon Critic |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#The Futon Critic
|
| Constructing an RFC |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Constructing an RFC
|
| On pointless battles, Inclusion vs Deletion of the minutia of fiction |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#On pointless battles, Inclusion vs Deletion of the minutia of fiction
|
| RFC Draft: Masem's proposal |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#RFC Draft: Masem's proposal
|
| Demo of sub-articles |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Demo of sub-articles
|
| RFC Draft: Randomran's proposal |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#RFC Draft: Randomran's proposal
|
| negative BLPs held to a higher standard |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#negative BLPs held to a higher standard
|
| More things that are needed |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#More things that are needed
|
| Sub-articles in general |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Sub-articles in general
|
| Image use in plot-only articles |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Image use in plot-only articles
|
| Guidelines on branching |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Guidelines on branching
|
| Wikipedia should not be a catalogue - case in point - State Roads and featured article about NY Route 32 |
66 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 25#Wikipedia should not be a catalogue - case in point - State Roads and featured article about NY Route 32
|
| When should we do the RfC? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#When should we do the RfC?
|
| Next phase of RFC preparation |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Next phase of RFC preparation
|
| Site good enough to be a source, but not notable enough to have an article |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Site good enough to be a source, but not notable enough to have an article
|
| Local sources != notability? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Local sources != notability?
|
| Copy-editing the upcoming RFC page |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Copy-editing the upcoming RFC page
|
| another criterion? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#another criterion?
|
| Modifying AfD |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Modifying AfD
|
| Obituaries as establishing notability |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Obituaries as establishing notability
|
| About the abuse of {{notability}} |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#About the abuse of {{notability}}
|
| Linking to Non-essay - unlableled opinion piece |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Linking to Non-essay - unlableled opinion piece
|
| Ten Eleven Twelve proposals for subject specific notability pages |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Ten Eleven Twelve proposals for subject specific notability pages
|
| Authors |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Authors
|
| Issue 2 of RfC |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Issue 2 of RfC
|
| Regarding issue #1 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Regarding issue #1
|
| Notability is not temporary, or can it be? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Notability is not temporary, or can it be?
|
| Notability of baseball players being discussed... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Notability of baseball players being discussed...
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (Septuagenarian female plumbers with red hair and freckles) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Wikipedia:Notability (Septuagenarian female plumbers with red hair and freckles)
|
| Too Many |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Too Many
|
| New notability guideline re: fraternal groups |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#New notability guideline re: fraternal groups
|
| Merchendise as Notability |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Merchendise as Notability
|
| How much third party coverage? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#How much third party coverage?
|
| RfC proposal |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#RfC proposal
|
| Cemetaries |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Cemetaries
|
| Notability and WP:Notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 26#Notability and WP:Notability
|
| A random essay on notability and vehicles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#A random essay on notability and vehicles
|
| Questions as to Speedy deletion criteria |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Questions as to Speedy deletion criteria
|
| Proposal for new section |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Proposal for new section
|
| Article vs. talk page |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Article vs. talk page
|
| Proposed Guideline: NOTED PLAYER |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Proposed Guideline: NOTED PLAYER
|
| Time to compromise |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Time to compromise
|
| In a better nutshell |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#In a better nutshell
|
| more of less strict |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#more of less strict
|
| Slight revamp of CSD for athletes needed? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Slight revamp of CSD for athletes needed?
|
| proposal |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#proposal
|
| Bristol Palin |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Bristol Palin
|
| RfC: Notability compromise - scope creep |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#RfC: Notability compromise - scope creep
|
| Wikipedia General Notability Guideline and Sarah Palin |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Wikipedia General Notability Guideline and Sarah Palin
|
| Confusing wording |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Confusing wording
|
| In a Nutshell: Yet more confusing wording |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#In a Nutshell: Yet more confusing wording
|
| Defining notability and football coaches |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Defining notability and football coaches
|
| Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Question
|
| For your consideration |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#For your consideration
|
| Tag for sections |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Tag for sections
|
| Rename proposal |
76 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Rename proposal
|
| Overhaul WP:NNC (also known as "Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content") |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Overhaul WP:NNC (also known as "Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content")
|
| This is not a vote |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#This is not a vote
|
| Significant change |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Significant change
|
| Readding to try to get more feedback |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Readding to try to get more feedback
|
| Deconstructing WP:N |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Deconstructing WP:N
|
| Where to put non-notable material? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 27#Where to put non-notable material?
|
| WP:N regarding Lists? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#WP:N regarding Lists?
|
| Notability of articles about recent mathematical ideas |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Notability of articles about recent mathematical ideas
|
| Regarding "In popular culture" sections of articles |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Regarding "In popular culture" sections of articles
|
| Too deletionist |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Too deletionist
|
| Definition of trivial? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Definition of trivial?
|
| Definition of independent |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Definition of independent
|
| Individual comic books |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 28#Individual comic books
|
| Inclusion of user subpage on "essays related to notability" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Inclusion of user subpage on "essays related to notability"
|
| Purpose of Notability |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Purpose of Notability
|
| Once again, there is a difference between non-notable and non-referenced. |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Once again, there is a difference between non-notable and non-referenced.
|
| Notability of journalism articles |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Notability of journalism articles
|
| WP:NPF conflicts with WP:NNC? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#WP:NPF conflicts with WP:NNC?
|
| And it's still there... |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#And it's still there...
|
| Moving forward on "notability" of non-notable lists |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Moving forward on "notability" of non-notable lists
|
| How do we list something in wikipedia |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#How do we list something in wikipedia
|
| RfC results |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#RfC results
|
| Bringing WP:NNC into alignment with WP:BLP |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Bringing WP:NNC into alignment with WP:BLP
|
| notability guidlines for clothing? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#notability guidlines for clothing?
|
| Is this podcast notable enough to be written up? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Is this podcast notable enough to be written up?
|
| Draft proposal |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Draft proposal
|
| Insert header here |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#Insert header here
|
| NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 29#NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer
|
| Mayors of small towns |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Mayors of small towns
|
| Significant coverage / sources |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Significant coverage / sources
|
| Notability a hostage to quantification not qualification |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Notability a hostage to quantification not qualification
|
| Reference library category |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Reference library category
|
| NNC again |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#NNC again
|
| need some context on the RFC (1: inherited notability, and 2: specific notability guidelines) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#need some context on the RFC (1: inherited notability, and 2: specific notability guidelines)
|
| Guidance |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Guidance
|
| The Graysons |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#The Graysons
|
| Does notability have to be in the real-world? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Does notability have to be in the real-world?
|
| Coverage in paper encyclopedias |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Coverage in paper encyclopedias
|
| Non-notable entries on a disambiguation page |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Non-notable entries on a disambiguation page
|
| Troubled |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Troubled
|
| Notability guideline: "Significant coverage" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Notability guideline: "Significant coverage"
|
| Not a news source |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Not a news source
|
| Article contents |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Article contents
|
| Remove the Disputed Tag |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Remove the Disputed Tag
|
| How Many |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#How Many
|
| Does the fact that Reliable Sources may be of interest to one "select community" mean they cannot establish notability? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Does the fact that Reliable Sources may be of interest to one "select community" mean they cannot establish notability?
|
| Yeah, so how about those spinout articles |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Yeah, so how about those spinout articles
|
| "Notability is not an absolute defense" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#"Notability is not an absolute defense"
|
| Summary style? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 30#Summary style?
|
| Cruise ships |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Cruise ships
|
| Time for an inclusionist fork? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Time for an inclusionist fork?
|
| Have I accidentally set a precedent? (individual automobiles) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Have I accidentally set a precedent? (individual automobiles)
|
| Final comments on Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Final comments on Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)
|
| Interwiki |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Interwiki
|
| Interwiki |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Interwiki 2
|
| Noticeboard |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Noticeboard
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks) marked as dormant |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks) marked as dormant
|
| Can someone help?? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Can someone help??
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (books) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Wikipedia:Notability (books)
|
| Notability Standards |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Notability Standards
|
| Academics notability criteria independent of main notability criteria? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Academics notability criteria independent of main notability criteria?
|
| Wording change |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Wording change
|
| What is still in dispute? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#What is still in dispute?
|
| Why the policy exists |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Why the policy exists
|
| The reach of this guideline at AFD |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#The reach of this guideline at AFD
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) seeking concensus |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) seeking concensus
|
| Re-evaluate WP:N? |
66 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Re-evaluate WP:N?
|
| Dare ya to answer this question |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Dare ya to answer this question
|
| Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV? |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?
|
| Notability and the Five Pillars |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#Notability and the Five Pillars
|
| Wording |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Wording
|
| In a Nutshell |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#In a Nutshell
|
| General interest |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 31#General interest
|
| Library of Congress classification categories |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Library of Congress classification categories
|
| Currently disputed sections |
74 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Currently disputed sections
|
| Another suggestion |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Another suggestion
|
| Should the guideline WP:Notability be promoted to a Policy? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Should the guideline WP:Notability be promoted to a Policy?
|
| Establishing notability for tropical cyclone articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Establishing notability for tropical cyclone articles
|
| TV and TV episode notability |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#TV and TV episode notability
|
| Multiple trivial references add up to real reference? Wrong, right? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Multiple trivial references add up to real reference? Wrong, right?
|
| General notability guideline, multiple trivial mentions, and WP:NOT#NEWS |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#General notability guideline, multiple trivial mentions, and WP:NOT#NEWS
|
| Interpretation of "independent" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Interpretation of "independent"
|
| Notability is not temporary |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Notability is not temporary
|
| What makes a video game (especially an on line game) notable |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#What makes a video game (especially an on line game) notable
|
| Inclusion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Inclusion
|
| Request for comment |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Request for comment
|
| notability != importance |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#notability != importance
|
| Merge proposal with TV pages |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Merge proposal with TV pages
|
| content |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#content
|
| Suggested recommendation for adjusting the philosophical approach of notability |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Suggested recommendation for adjusting the philosophical approach of notability
|
| Sports notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Sports notability
|
| Voting time. Any television series that has at least a million viewers, may have an article for every episode |
102 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Voting time. Any television series that has at least a million viewers, may have an article for every episode
|
| Question: P vs. G |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 32#Question: P vs. G
|
| Reviews? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Reviews?
|
| Notable for not being notable |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Notable for not being notable
|
| Replacement word |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Replacement word
|
| Increasing the archive time from 7 days |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Increasing the archive time from 7 days
|
| Notability is not inherited |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Notability is not inherited
|
| First draft of WP:NOTINHERITED |
72 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#First draft of WP:NOTINHERITED
|
| Non-notable content within existing articles |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Non-notable content within existing articles
|
| Notability is not temporary |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Notability is not temporary
|
| Sport championship pages |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Sport championship pages
|
| Notability of Bilateral Relations |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 33#Notability of Bilateral Relations
|
| Notability applies to information, as well as topics |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability applies to information, as well as topics
|
| Criteria for short stories |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Criteria for short stories
|
| Coverage |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Coverage
|
| Sporked over from Wikipedia talk:Notability (streets, roads, and highways) |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Sporked over from Wikipedia talk:Notability (streets, roads, and highways)
|
| Is merger required in every deletion with some reliable sourced information? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Is merger required in every deletion with some reliable sourced information?
|
| the deletion of the history-economic documentary film "the Money Masters" from wiki |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#the deletion of the history-economic documentary film "the Money Masters" from wiki
|
| Notability of the remainder of something |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability of the remainder of something
|
| Should insignificant subjects be considered notable? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Should insignificant subjects be considered notable?
|
| Inherent notability |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Inherent notability
|
| Notability of bilateral relations articles |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability of bilateral relations articles
|
| Timothy Prager new entry |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Timothy Prager new entry
|
| Are books inherently notable? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Are books inherently notable?
|
| Soldiers dying in armed conflicts |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Soldiers dying in armed conflicts
|
| Why does it matter? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Why does it matter?
|
| Product reviews |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Product reviews
|
| Exhaustive vs. exclusive |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Exhaustive vs. exclusive
|
| Scrubs |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Scrubs
|
| Bengali romanization |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Bengali romanization
|
| nutshell |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#nutshell
|
| Notice of relevant discussion at village pump |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notice of relevant discussion at village pump
|
| Notability of list items |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability of list items
|
| Not sufficient, but necessary |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Not sufficient, but necessary
|
| Notability a guideline, not a policy |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability a guideline, not a policy
|
| Notability of places |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability of places
|
| notability in citations? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#notability in citations?
|
| Propose rewrite of the lead section |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Propose rewrite of the lead section
|
| Existence does not equal notability |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Existence does not equal notability
|
| Notability again, this time at strategic planning. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 34#Notability again, this time at strategic planning.
|
| Subtleties of notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Subtleties of notability
|
| Rethinking notability as a means of, but not itself, meeting content policies |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Rethinking notability as a means of, but not itself, meeting content policies
|
| Upwards inherancy? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Upwards inherancy?
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (law) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Wikipedia:Notability (law)
|
| Notability as an independent standard |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Notability as an independent standard
|
| Some musings on the plethora of guidance and questions |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Some musings on the plethora of guidance and questions
|
| Self-inherent notability? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Self-inherent notability?
|
| Insertion of "atlases and maps" |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Insertion of "atlases and maps"
|
| Non notable names in articles |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Non notable names in articles
|
| Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashida Kim (7th nomination) |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashida Kim (7th nomination)
|
| Is there actually a consensus for the current definition of notability? |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Is there actually a consensus for the current definition of notability?
|
| Do news reports confer notablity? |
57 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#Do news reports confer notablity?
|
| AFD and news reports |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 35#AFD and news reports
|
| Wikiprojects can tighten but not loosen the GNG? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Wikiprojects can tighten but not loosen the GNG?
|
| Verifiable evidence |
53 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Verifiable evidence
|
| Document in detail why article has notability concerns before adding notability tag to an article |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Document in detail why article has notability concerns before adding notability tag to an article
|
| Proposed RFC |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Proposed RFC
|
| notablity template |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#notablity template
|
| New subject-specific guidelines: Merits |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#New subject-specific guidelines: Merits
|
| Notability is a red herring |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Notability is a red herring
|
| Is notability "required"? |
109 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#Is notability "required"?
|
| Inherently Subjective |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Inherently Subjective
|
| How do you think "should" would work? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#How do you think "should" would work?
|
| When is it OK to remove a notability tag? |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#When is it OK to remove a notability tag?
|
| Notability CAN BE temporary |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#Notability CAN BE temporary
|
| "Breaking big news" articles |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 36#"Breaking big news" articles
|
| Related discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#Related discussion
|
| Are English sources required for notability? |
65 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#Are English sources required for notability?
|
| 'Notability is not temporary': Philosophical musings |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#'Notability is not temporary': Philosophical musings
|
| advice for the cultural sector |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#advice for the cultural sector
|
| Added text |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#Added text
|
| Notability noticeboard |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#Notability noticeboard
|
| Removal of user-space essays |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Removal of user-space essays
|
| Self promotion and indiscriminate publicity |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 37#Self promotion and indiscriminate publicity
|
| Intro |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Intro
|
| Claims that notabiluty affects every section in an article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Claims that notabiluty affects every section in an article
|
| SPIP |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#SPIP
|
| RFC: Self promotion and indiscriminate publicity |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#RFC: Self promotion and indiscriminate publicity
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (news events) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Wikipedia:Notability (news events)
|
| Notability of Schools |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Notability of Schools
|
| Can I get an outside opinion on this comment? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Can I get an outside opinion on this comment?
|
| Is it the same thing as N? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Is it the same thing as N?
|
| Military Service and Decorations |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Military Service and Decorations
|
| Sufficiency |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Sufficiency
|
| PROPOSAL: Changing relationship of GNG to specific notability guidelines |
53 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#PROPOSAL: Changing relationship of GNG to specific notability guidelines
|
| Substantive or Significant? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Substantive or Significant?
|
| Notability is not temporary - interpretation |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Notability is not temporary - interpretation
|
| Whose consensus? |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 38#Whose consensus?
|
| Inherent notability |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#Inherent notability
|
| Inherent notability - Proposed wording |
83 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#Inherent notability - Proposed wording
|
| User essay: Inherent Notability as a slang term |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#User essay: Inherent Notability as a slang term
|
| Notability of Specific Dogs |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#Notability of Specific Dogs
|
| WP:RELEVANT |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#WP:RELEVANT
|
| New notability guideline proposed for software |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#New notability guideline proposed for software
|
| Plurality |
161 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#Plurality
|
| Internet memes |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39#Internet memes
|
| Understanding the guidelines |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#Understanding the guidelines
|
| GNG applied to local interests |
59 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#GNG applied to local interests
|
| WP:BIO |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#WP:BIO
|
| WP:CRYSTAL |
71 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#WP:CRYSTAL
|
| Not temporary |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#Not temporary
|
| Simple Question |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#Simple Question
|
| Defunct magazine or journal |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#Defunct magazine or journal
|
| With every added word will this discussion be nearer to consensus. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 40#With every added word will this discussion be nearer to consensus.
|
| Word to avoid |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#Word to avoid
|
| RfC to apply notability to article contents |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#RfC to apply notability to article contents
|
| Railway incidents guideline |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#Railway incidents guideline
|
| Notability of open source software |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#Notability of open source software
|
| A reliable source for open source |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#A reliable source for open source
|
| Difference between policy and practice |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#Difference between policy and practice
|
| Delete the non-notable, but save the knowledge |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#Delete the non-notable, but save the knowledge
|
| Who decided that lists needed independent notability? |
94 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Who decided that lists needed independent notability?
|
| Infinite Wisdom |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#Infinite Wisdom
|
| This is only a guideline |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 41#This is only a guideline
|
| Reference |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Reference
|
| On sources of a scheduled or universal nature |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#On sources of a scheduled or universal nature
|
| Notablity of qutoes not established on Philip Larkin |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Notablity of qutoes not established on Philip Larkin
|
| Foreign language sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Foreign language sources
|
| Proposal to merge relevant parts of WP:NEO here |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Proposal to merge relevant parts of WP:NEO here
|
| Self-promotion |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Self-promotion
|
| notability for software |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#notability for software
|
| Downgrading this guideline to an essay |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Downgrading this guideline to an essay
|
| Template notation for cites considered to apply toward GNG? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Template notation for cites considered to apply toward GNG?
|
| Adding something about global vs local coverage |
83 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Adding something about global vs local coverage
|
| Transcluding MoS |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Transcluding MoS
|
| Notability proposal for reference works. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Notability proposal for reference works.
|
| Notability vs. Wikipedia mission statement |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Notability vs. Wikipedia mission statement
|
| Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Ely (2nd nomination) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Ely (2nd nomination)
|
| Best evidence |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 42#Best evidence
|
| third party sources |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#third party sources
|
| Where exactly did the "World at large" stuff get consensus? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Where exactly did the "World at large" stuff get consensus?
|
| Language, again |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Language, again
|
| Multiple sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Multiple sources
|
| Demo album debate |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Demo album debate
|
| without verifiable evidence of notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#without verifiable evidence of notability
|
| Notability of small settlements |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Notability of small settlements
|
| General standards |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#General standards
|
| Overlap and confusion... don't know where to discuss |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Overlap and confusion... don't know where to discuss
|
| WP:Notability is hampering usability of WP |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#WP:Notability is hampering usability of WP
|
| Nightmare Legacy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Nightmare Legacy
|
| Change in wording to clarify |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Change in wording to clarify
|
| nutshell and "worthy of notice" |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#nutshell and "worthy of notice"
|
| AfD Pseudoscholarship |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#AfD Pseudoscholarship
|
| SNG for bilateral relations articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#SNG for bilateral relations articles
|
| Celebrity abuse |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#Celebrity abuse
|
| "Notability is not temporary" |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 43#"Notability is not temporary"
|
| Geographic Locations |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#Geographic Locations
|
| Notability is not temporary |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#Notability is not temporary
|
| peer-reviewed literature |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#peer-reviewed literature
|
| "All universities and colleges are notable" ? |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#"All universities and colleges are notable" ?
|
| RFC: Should Notability (fiction) be reinstated as a guideline? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#RFC: Should Notability (fiction) be reinstated as a guideline?
|
| inre: The General notablity guide |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#inre: The General notablity guide
|
| RfC: Should Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts) be merged with Wikipedia:Notability (events) and Wikipedia:Notability (people)? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#RfC: Should Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts) be merged with Wikipedia:Notability (events) and Wikipedia:Notability (people)?
|
| Notability limits article titles? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#Notability limits article titles?
|
| This guideline is harmfull and doesnt reflect concensus of the wider community |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#This guideline is harmfull and doesnt reflect concensus of the wider community
|
| Relationship with more specialized notability guidelines |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#Relationship with more specialized notability guidelines
|
| Its a town jim but not as we know it |
75 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 44#Its a town jim but not as we know it
|
| Language as Criteria for Notability |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Language as Criteria for Notability
|
| Carroty |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Carroty
|
| How many returns in a popular search engine like Google does it take? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#How many returns in a popular search engine like Google does it take?
|
| If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic... |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic...
|
| Help with Article for Deletion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Help with Article for Deletion
|
| Question |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Question
|
| Lists and Notability |
92 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Lists and Notability
|
| Proposal re: List articles. |
167 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Proposal re: List articles.
|
| wording for new section on lists |
91 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#wording for new section on lists
|
| When notability guidelines collide |
56 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#When notability guidelines collide
|
| Subtopic notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Subtopic notability
|
| Relevant Afd |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Relevant Afd
|
| Village Pump discussions on notability of religious figureheads |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Village Pump discussions on notability of religious figureheads
|
| Current Afd regarding a list article |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Current Afd regarding a list article
|
| List exception does not belong there |
54 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#List exception does not belong there
|
| Notability is not temporary... or is it? |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#Notability is not temporary... or is it?
|
| One source sufficient? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 45#One source sufficient?
|
| Go-cart facilities? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Go-cart facilities?
|
| Living people |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Living people
|
| Question about notability. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Question about notability.
|
| Should the general notability guideline be used to support deletion? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Should the general notability guideline be used to support deletion?
|
| What is the consensus on City articles? |
112 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#What is the consensus on City articles?
|
| Hey phone |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Hey phone
|
| Patents supporting notability for an inventor |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Patents supporting notability for an inventor
|
| Completed a big step on lists |
113 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Completed a big step on lists
|
| Request for nutshell revision: Add published |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Request for nutshell revision: Add published
|
| Attempt to develop consensus on notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Attempt to develop consensus on notability
|
| Persistent confusion of notability with weight |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Persistent confusion of notability with weight
|
| Felisa Wolfe-Simon, world top story scientist may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Felisa Wolfe-Simon, world top story scientist may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines
|
| Verifiability vs Notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Verifiability vs Notability
|
| New notability(?) guideline |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#New notability(?) guideline
|
| Or (Lists) |
81 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Or (Lists)
|
| Notability and lists... a new question |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Notability and lists... a new question
|
| Can I ask the Article's Subject? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Can I ask the Article's Subject?
|
| "Grain of sand" notability |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#"Grain of sand" notability
|
| Notability of neighborhoods |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Notability of neighborhoods
|
| Forking |
124 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Forking
|
| Changed order of sections |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 46#Changed order of sections
|
| Notability - very subjective when it comes to less glorious ancient history |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Notability - very subjective when it comes to less glorious ancient history
|
| Do restaurant reviews count as "significant coverage" of the reviewed restaurants? |
73 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Do restaurant reviews count as "significant coverage" of the reviewed restaurants?
|
| time traveller |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#time traveller
|
| Notability Guidelines for Locations? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Notability Guidelines for Locations?
|
| Mentioning non-notables from reality show |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Mentioning non-notables from reality show
|
| Notability for sex-related subjects |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Notability for sex-related subjects
|
| Shortcut added for List section |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Shortcut added for List section
|
| Do subject-specific guidelines override the GNG |
95 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Do subject-specific guidelines override the GNG
|
| The next step on lists |
74 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#The next step on lists
|
| Can something that doesn't yet exist/only just came into existence be notable? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Can something that doesn't yet exist/only just came into existence be notable?
|
| Notice of RfC: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Differences between novel and film |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 47#Notice of RfC: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Differences between novel and film
|
| Does being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts meet notability criteria? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Does being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts meet notability criteria?
|
| proposal to restore Wikilink for "content policies" in WP:NNC |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#proposal to restore Wikilink for "content policies" in WP:NNC
|
| Questions re Relevancy |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Questions re Relevancy
|
| "Enduring" notability |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#"Enduring" notability
|
| Notability (philosophy) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Notability (philosophy)
|
| Notability for video games |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Notability for video games
|
| Confused explanation on notability |
147 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Confused explanation on notability
|
| Notability by acclamation |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Notability by acclamation
|
| Subject specific guidelines |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Subject specific guidelines
|
| Games Biographies and people in categories |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Games Biographies and people in categories
|
| Common circumstances |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Common circumstances
|
| Intro and nutshell |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Intro and nutshell
|
| Buildings |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Buildings
|
| Notability is not temporary... but notariety can be |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Notability is not temporary... but notariety can be
|
| Roads |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Roads
|
| Notability in lists |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Notability in lists
|
| Are patents notable in and of themselves? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Are patents notable in and of themselves?
|
| Topics that deserve a page in wikipedia |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Topics that deserve a page in wikipedia
|
| Change notability criteria for list topics |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Change notability criteria for list topics
|
| "Automatically" notable topics |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#"Automatically" notable topics
|
| Is a chemical substance recorded in CAS notable? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Is a chemical substance recorded in CAS notable?
|
| Subject Specific Guidelines and Deletion |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Subject Specific Guidelines and Deletion
|
| WP:Notability (video games) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#WP:Notability (video games)
|
| Report things that happen |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Report things that happen
|
| Why is this needed? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Why is this needed?
|
| Nutshell |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Nutshell
|
| Edit semi-protected |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Edit semi-protected
|
| WikiSports as notable |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#WikiSports as notable
|
| Independent sources for fictional characters |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Independent sources for fictional characters
|
| School Notability |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#School Notability
|
| Essay elevation to Guideline proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Essay elevation to Guideline proposal
|
| Nomination for deletion of Template:Notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Nomination for deletion of Template:Notability
|
| Book Notability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Book Notability
|
| Synthetic notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Synthetic notability
|
| Restoring an important point |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Restoring an important point
|
| Absence of proof not proof of (something |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Absence of proof not proof of (something
|
| Why is this not official policy? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Why is this not official policy?
|
| Forced notabliity. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Forced notabliity.
|
| Hatnotes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 48#Hatnotes
|
| Reliable/Reliability |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Reliable/Reliability
|
| Subject Specific Guidelines |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Subject Specific Guidelines
|
| Stubs about minor planets named after people |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Stubs about minor planets named after people
|
| A case of WP:ONEEVENT? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#A case of WP:ONEEVENT?
|
| learning wikipedia |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#learning wikipedia
|
| Primary source templates discussions |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Primary source templates discussions
|
| Notability regarding article creation or regarding article content |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notability regarding article creation or regarding article content
|
| Where is the the line drawn with one event? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Where is the the line drawn with one event?
|
| WP:NRVE contridicts all subject-specific guidelines. Suggest changing it. |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#WP:NRVE contridicts all subject-specific guidelines. Suggest changing it.
|
| You don't need the sources to be third party to be reliable. Suggest we remove that bit. |
95 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#You don't need the sources to be third party to be reliable. Suggest we remove that bit.
|
| Notification of discussion: Are articles about WMF Projects exempt from WP:N? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notification of discussion: Are articles about WMF Projects exempt from WP:N?
|
| Suggested change to avoid contradiction |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Suggested change to avoid contradiction
|
| Trade press vs. general press |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Trade press vs. general press
|
| Notability guideline required for articles about products |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notability guideline required for articles about products
|
| Question |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Question
|
| List of non-notable topics |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#List of non-notable topics
|
| can vs. should |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#can vs. should
|
| Notability of lists |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notability of lists
|
| Why |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Why
|
| Pokemon and discrimination by sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Pokemon and discrimination by sources
|
| Should Criteria 11 include music television stations? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Should Criteria 11 include music television stations?
|
| Considering "notability does not limit article content" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Considering "notability does not limit article content"
|
| Notability of research projects |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notability of research projects
|
| Interpretation of Notability requires verifiable evidence |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Interpretation of Notability requires verifiable evidence
|
| Interviews count as primary, but it says for GNG you need secondary sources. |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Interviews count as primary, but it says for GNG you need secondary sources.
|
| Proposal: Selection by reliable sources for interviews is a method of showing significant coverage |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Proposal: Selection by reliable sources for interviews is a method of showing significant coverage
|
| Notable by definition? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notable by definition?
|
| GNG relation to Notability (sports) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#GNG relation to Notability (sports)
|
| Notability on other languages' Wikipedias |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Notability on other languages' Wikipedias
|
| Wikipedia:Abuse of the General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions nominated for deletion |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Wikipedia:Abuse of the General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions nominated for deletion
|
| WP:Viability of lists |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#WP:Viability of lists
|
| WHYN. At least one secondary source |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#WHYN. At least one secondary source
|
| Why, at last |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Why, at last
|
| Articles need multiple sources |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Articles need multiple sources
|
| Do ten articles on ten Czech hockey players belong on en.Wikipedia? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 49#Do ten articles on ten Czech hockey players belong on en.Wikipedia?
|
| change to GNG |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#change to GNG
|
| Notability of Media markets, again |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Notability of Media markets, again
|
| Inconsistent application of notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Inconsistent application of notability
|
| Is a dedicated article in a tetriary source not enough? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Is a dedicated article in a tetriary source not enough?
|
| What is the criteria for creating a separate "Discography" page for a band? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#What is the criteria for creating a separate "Discography" page for a band?
|
| Establishing Notability for Online Publications |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Establishing Notability for Online Publications
|
| Links to article, as a measure of notability? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Links to article, as a measure of notability?
|
| Wikipedia:Improving AFD debates |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Wikipedia:Improving AFD debates
|
| Notability is sometimes temporary |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Notability is sometimes temporary
|
| Making a declaration that this guideline is not the only thing that restricts article creation |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Making a declaration that this guideline is not the only thing that restricts article creation
|
| some thing about the notability of wikipedica |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#some thing about the notability of wikipedica
|
| Subjectivity |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Subjectivity
|
| Related RFC |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Related RFC
|
| Notability of railway stations |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Notability of railway stations
|
| Notability |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Notability
|
| Third opinion needed |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Third opinion needed
|
| Comments requested at WT:WEB |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Comments requested at WT:WEB
|
| Place names (again) |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Place names (again)
|
| Long-shot proposal to modify how notability works |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Long-shot proposal to modify how notability works
|
| Forks without Notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Forks without Notability
|
| Notability of players of Gaelic football, hurling, and handball |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Notability of players of Gaelic football, hurling, and handball
|
| Inherited notability |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Inherited notability
|
| Articles "redirected" which are determined to be nn |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Articles "redirected" which are determined to be nn
|
| Are there avenues to "notability" not mentioned in this guideline? |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Are there avenues to "notability" not mentioned in this guideline?
|
| Establishing the relationship with the GNG and the SNGs |
67 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Establishing the relationship with the GNG and the SNGs
|
| Help requested |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Help requested
|
| Policy change for the notability of restaurant reviews |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Policy change for the notability of restaurant reviews
|
| Secondary sources |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Secondary sources
|
| Local sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Local sources
|
| Reminder-- Delete votes hurt writers' feelings |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Reminder-- Delete votes hurt writers' feelings
|
| Edit request on 9 March 2012 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Edit request on 9 March 2012
|
| Why is the american u.s. tv series the BiG BANG THEORY theory allowed to be more notable than what is real, really, The Big Bang Theory |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Why is the american u.s. tv series the BiG BANG THEORY theory allowed to be more notable than what is real, really, The Big Bang Theory
|
| Notability vs Notoriety |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Notability vs Notoriety
|
| Spammers are bribing people to write sources. |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Spammers are bribing people to write sources.
|
| WP:IINFO |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#WP:IINFO
|
| WP:BK |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#WP:BK
|
| Geography |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 50#Geography
|
| Directly |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Directly
|
| Secondary v. independent v. third-party |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Secondary v. independent v. third-party
|
| Reverts |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Reverts
|
| General remarks |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#General remarks
|
| Off-topic rants |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Off-topic rants
|
| How to word it so people know notable interviews count towards notability? |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#How to word it so people know notable interviews count towards notability?
|
| Nutshell of the sports notability page |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Nutshell of the sports notability page
|
| GNG |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#GNG
|
| Notability of spin out articles |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Notability of spin out articles
|
| "worthy of notice" |
67 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#"worthy of notice"
|
| Proposal to remove "and list" from a sentence in the lede of WP:N |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Proposal to remove "and list" from a sentence in the lede of WP:N
|
| Rewrite the entire lede |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Rewrite the entire lede
|
| RfC: Should the summary style guideline quote WP:Notability and if so in what place |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#RfC: Should the summary style guideline quote WP:Notability and if so in what place
|
| Eyes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Eyes
|
| This Policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#This Policy
|
| changing the nutshell |
92 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#changing the nutshell
|
| Page View Statistics |
83 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Page View Statistics
|
| coining |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#coining
|
| Making the guideline clearer |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Making the guideline clearer
|
| "Presumption" |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#"Presumption"
|
| how to explain to people that they got deleted? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#how to explain to people that they got deleted?
|
| Not now / Too soon |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Not now / Too soon
|
| Category Deletion |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Category Deletion
|
| checking the temperature for a name change (in principle) |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#checking the temperature for a name change (in principle)
|
| 30 days before archiving |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#30 days before archiving
|
| Category:Fictional immortals |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Category:Fictional immortals
|
| Notability - a question |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Notability - a question
|
| Wording change |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Wording change
|
| Lists redux |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Lists redux
|
| Criteria for standalone lists and galleries |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Criteria for standalone lists and galleries
|
| Notability of learned societies with weak coverage |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 51#Notability of learned societies with weak coverage
|
| Discussion at Talk:Axis occupation of Vojvodina#RfC:Is this article subject notable, and if so, is it an acceptable fork of existing articles? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Discussion at Talk:Axis occupation of Vojvodina#RfC:Is this article subject notable, and if so, is it an acceptable fork of existing articles?
|
| Suntribe and The Mullans at AfD |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Suntribe and The Mullans at AfD
|
| Plays |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Plays
|
| gauge, determine, directly affect |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#gauge, determine, directly affect
|
| Two open-ended questions: cross-categorized lists, and lists included under other criteria |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Two open-ended questions: cross-categorized lists, and lists included under other criteria
|
| Secondary and independent |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Secondary and independent
|
| Misleading nutshell? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Misleading nutshell?
|
| New section: "Notable topics do not require a separate article" |
200 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#New section: "Notable topics do not require a separate article"
|
| What is "multiple" sources? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#What is "multiple" sources?
|
| Can someone be notable for the fact that they were interviewed by a major media outlet... regardless of what they were interviewed about |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Can someone be notable for the fact that they were interviewed by a major media outlet... regardless of what they were interviewed about
|
| Temporary |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Temporary
|
| Notability of buildings and structures |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Notability of buildings and structures
|
| "necessary but not sufficient" criteria |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#"necessary but not sufficient" criteria
|
| WP:FRINGE |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#WP:FRINGE
|
| Writing specific articles |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Writing specific articles
|
| Proposed new notability section for authors |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Proposed new notability section for authors
|
| Rules contradiction |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Rules contradiction
|
| Inherent notability for schools (again) |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Inherent notability for schools (again)
|
| Wrong link |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Wrong link
|
| WP:LISTN: Notability of a list |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#WP:LISTN: Notability of a list
|
| We have a new notability guideline! |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#We have a new notability guideline!
|
| Friendly reminder |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Friendly reminder
|
| Specialty notability guidelines for Masonic groups and similar organizations. |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 52#Specialty notability guidelines for Masonic groups and similar organizations.
|
| Suggestion for a new section "Subject-specific notability guidelines" |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Suggestion for a new section "Subject-specific notability guidelines"
|
| Do sections of long encyclopedia articles contribute to establishing notability? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Do sections of long encyclopedia articles contribute to establishing notability?
|
| Is plot summary "significant content"? |
78 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Is plot summary "significant content"?
|
| What does notability attach to? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#What does notability attach to?
|
| Notability proof |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Notability proof
|
| Fading notability |
58 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Fading notability
|
| Notability of ideas? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Notability of ideas?
|
| Transcluding "Wikipedia:Notability (summary)" onto "Wikipedia:Notability" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Transcluding "Wikipedia:Notability (summary)" onto "Wikipedia:Notability"
|
| MediaWiki should ask unconfirmed users if their new pages are notable or not |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#MediaWiki should ask unconfirmed users if their new pages are notable or not
|
| Concert venues and art galleries |
66 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Concert venues and art galleries
|
| Notability and social media sites |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Notability and social media sites
|
| Is a train notable? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Is a train notable?
|
| WP:Determining whether a subject qualifies for an article |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#WP:Determining whether a subject qualifies for an article
|
| Local Politicians having their friends create glowing Wikipedia pages for them |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Local Politicians having their friends create glowing Wikipedia pages for them
|
| "Sources are not required ... to be in English." |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#"Sources are not required ... to be in English."
|
| WP:Notifications |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#WP:Notifications
|
| Propose Transportation Notability Subsection |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Propose Transportation Notability Subsection
|
| Citations don't have to be in articles? |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Citations don't have to be in articles?
|
| Political Notability |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Political Notability
|
| F-100 VS MIG 19 |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#F-100 VS MIG 19
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)
|
| Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Berendo Street and Avenue |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Berendo Street and Avenue
|
| Planned construction projects (buildings, etc) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 53#Planned construction projects (buildings, etc)
|
| researchers with Mexico's Sistema Nacional de Investigadores |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#researchers with Mexico's Sistema Nacional de Investigadores
|
| Edit request on 11 September 2013 |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Edit request on 11 September 2013
|
| Proposal to close the Notability noticeboard |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Proposal to close the Notability noticeboard
|
| Presumption vs prerequisite |
72 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Presumption vs prerequisite
|
| GNG and opinion sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#GNG and opinion sources
|
| Amateur Efforts, Notability, and Reliability |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Amateur Efforts, Notability, and Reliability
|
| Remove proposal |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Remove proposal
|
| Proposal for word replacement |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Proposal for word replacement
|
| Professions vs. professionals |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Professions vs. professionals
|
| Notability of some churches and mosques |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Notability of some churches and mosques
|
| TheDetroiter.com |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#TheDetroiter.com
|
| The Sudans |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#The Sudans
|
| When is one sentence sufficient to establish notability? |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#When is one sentence sufficient to establish notability?
|
| Afd Discussion ignoring notability guideline |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Afd Discussion ignoring notability guideline
|
| Addressing concerns with Notability (geographic features) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Addressing concerns with Notability (geographic features)
|
| RfC announcement |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#RfC announcement
|
| Malware reviews |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Malware reviews
|
| Please comment about General References vs Inline Citations in Afc submissions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Please comment about General References vs Inline Citations in Afc submissions
|
| Academics |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Academics
|
| Time to close and fail Wikipedia:Notability (products) |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Time to close and fail Wikipedia:Notability (products)
|
| Proposed quotebox addition |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Proposed quotebox addition
|
| WP:SIGNIF |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#WP:SIGNIF
|
| Checking notability of a new BLP |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Checking notability of a new BLP
|
| Significant coverage |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Significant coverage
|
| Revisiting our policies as they relate to fictional content |
59 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Revisiting our policies as they relate to fictional content
|
| Clarifying Noteworthy vs Notable |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Clarifying Noteworthy vs Notable
|
| What policy means on Wikipedia |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#What policy means on Wikipedia
|
| Asking about notability in advance |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Asking about notability in advance
|
| Adding a small sentence about geography |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Adding a small sentence about geography
|
| Gender, racial and Geographic bias in coverage |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Gender, racial and Geographic bias in coverage
|
| Should notability really be such a keystone of Wikipedia? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Should notability really be such a keystone of Wikipedia?
|
| Notability standards for WP:SPLIT |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Notability standards for WP:SPLIT
|
| Proposal to add European chicken farming example to this guideline |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Proposal to add European chicken farming example to this guideline
|
| I create article, add it to list. It goes to AfD. With no RS, consensus is it's not notable. Closed instead as redirect because I added to a list? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#I create article, add it to list. It goes to AfD. With no RS, consensus is it's not notable. Closed instead as redirect because I added to a list?
|
| Article needs internal consistency |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Article needs internal consistency
|
| GNG and local sources |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#GNG and local sources
|
| Should an article that exists in another language always be considered notable? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Should an article that exists in another language always be considered notable?
|
| WHYN |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#WHYN
|
| Minimal coverage or topic-specific notability? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Minimal coverage or topic-specific notability?
|
| Notability requires verifiable evidence (NRV) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Notability requires verifiable evidence (NRV)
|
| The application of the "presumption" of notability |
121 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#The application of the "presumption" of notability
|
| Notability of Fringe topics |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Notability of Fringe topics
|
| WP:GNG vs article standards adopted by individual WikiProject |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#WP:GNG vs article standards adopted by individual WikiProject
|
| Significant coverage question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 54#Significant coverage question
|
| Renaming Notability |
253 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Renaming Notability
|
| Wikipedia:Interviews |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#Wikipedia:Interviews
|
| How about the term Independence instead of Inclusion? |
65 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#How about the term Independence instead of Inclusion?
|
| Susan Lindauer |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#Susan Lindauer
|
| Notability, again |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#Notability, again
|
| Let's collect potential new names for this article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#Let's collect potential new names for this article
|
| List of Ideas |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#List of Ideas
|
| ORG needs more views |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#ORG needs more views
|
| "Gutting" an article during deletion discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 55#"Gutting" an article during deletion discussion
|
| People's definition of "notable" or "notability" in regards to content |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#People's definition of "notable" or "notability" in regards to content
|
| Somewhere to ask about whether an article's subject is notable? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Somewhere to ask about whether an article's subject is notable?
|
| Another question |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Another question
|
| Simplify terminology - "Cross Categorization" & "Intersection" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Simplify terminology - "Cross Categorization" & "Intersection"
|
| Other wiki-languages |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Other wiki-languages
|
| Historical Buildings |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Historical Buildings
|
| Biblical verses, any presumption against their notability? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Biblical verses, any presumption against their notability?
|
| Lede is too long |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Lede is too long
|
| Notability for entertainers |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Notability for entertainers
|
| Reliability vs. bias |
92 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Reliability vs. bias
|
| Local (county level) politicians in the US |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Local (county level) politicians in the US
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 21 February 2015 |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Semi-protected edit request on 21 February 2015
|
| Immediate merges as a solution to articles? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Immediate merges as a solution to articles?
|
| Artworks |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Artworks
|
| Notability based on how many non-English WP articles exist |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Notability based on how many non-English WP articles exist
|
| A short burst of sources is not enough |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#A short burst of sources is not enough
|
| Suggest WP:NSM noteworthy based on social media |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Suggest WP:NSM noteworthy based on social media
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2015 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2015
|
| Erika Csiszer |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Erika Csiszer
|
| Notice: RFC at WikiProject Film |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 56#Notice: RFC at WikiProject Film
|
| Reasonably Detailed expectation on top of notability. |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Reasonably Detailed expectation on top of notability.
|
| Change "Extract the content" to "write an article with the content" |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Change "Extract the content" to "write an article with the content"
|
| Is there a standard to determine "credible and authoritative books" |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Is there a standard to determine "credible and authoritative books"
|
| Extradition history by countries |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Extradition history by countries
|
| Let's move "depth of coverage" (first para) and "audience" sections from WP:CORP here |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Let's move "depth of coverage" (first para) and "audience" sections from WP:CORP here
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2015 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2015
|
| Rewritten notability guideline |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Rewritten notability guideline
|
| NEXIST |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#NEXIST
|
| Notability of concepts |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Notability of concepts
|
| Notability mills |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Notability mills
|
| RfC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#RfC
|
| RfC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#RfC 2
|
| Expanding notability policy to cover judges |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Expanding notability policy to cover judges
|
| Video Games |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Video Games
|
| Nutshell wording |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Nutshell wording
|
| Does an independent publication become no longer independent because the journalist spoke with the subject? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Does an independent publication become no longer independent because the journalist spoke with the subject?
|
| statement of notability |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#statement of notability
|
| Re: Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article: |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Re: Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article:
|
| and |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#and
|
| RFC on significant coverage and fictional characters |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#RFC on significant coverage and fictional characters
|
| Airbnb |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Airbnb
|
| Companies notable for one event |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Companies notable for one event
|
| Self-promotion and publicity: a sentence on interviews? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Self-promotion and publicity: a sentence on interviews?
|
| Seeking input about the inclusion of a high school in a political biography article |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Seeking input about the inclusion of a high school in a political biography article
|
| "One sentence mention" |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#"One sentence mention"
|
| On the "routine" language |
125 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#On the "routine" language
|
| Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#RFC: delete and redirect |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 57#Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#RFC: delete and redirect
|
| Indiscriminate exclusion of topics |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Indiscriminate exclusion of topics
|
| RFC: when are community radio stations notable? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#RFC: when are community radio stations notable?
|
| Recent changes |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Recent changes
|
| Mixed messages |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Mixed messages
|
| Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)
|
| Initial hubbub |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Initial hubbub
|
| NTEMP |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#NTEMP
|
| Nomination of Texas Longhorns football series records for deletion |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Nomination of Texas Longhorns football series records for deletion
|
| Small proposed change per Wikipedia:Article size |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Small proposed change per Wikipedia:Article size
|
| Request for comment |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Request for comment
|
| Clarification on GNG versus specific guidelines |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Clarification on GNG versus specific guidelines
|
| Clarification on WP:LISTN |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Clarification on WP:LISTN
|
| Quantum anthropology help |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Quantum anthropology help
|
| Notability as far as being included in footer template lists |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Notability as far as being included in footer template lists
|
| RfC: Does WP:N apply to drafts in userspace or draftspace? |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#RfC: Does WP:N apply to drafts in userspace or draftspace?
|
| Template:Notability edit request |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Template:Notability edit request
|
| Notability and reliance on primary+affiliated sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Notability and reliance on primary+affiliated sources
|
| Wikipedia term "Navel-gazing" usage in deletion debates |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Wikipedia term "Navel-gazing" usage in deletion debates
|
| Notability question |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Notability question
|
| Presidential Campaign Pages |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Presidential Campaign Pages
|
| Public Libraries |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Public Libraries
|
| WP:AUTHOR: 'Significant' |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#WP:AUTHOR: 'Significant'
|
| Globality of Wikipedia 'Notability' criteria |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Globality of Wikipedia 'Notability' criteria
|
| Does a list of "notable x" in an article require each item in that list to have an article? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Does a list of "notable x" in an article require each item in that list to have an article?
|
| Question about the Academy Award for Best Technical Achievement |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Question about the Academy Award for Best Technical Achievement
|
| Systemic Bias: Proposing a separate standard of notability |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Systemic Bias: Proposing a separate standard of notability
|
| Marking W:N historical |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Marking W:N historical
|
| Adding ways to assess Systemic Bias to WP:N |
186 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Adding ways to assess Systemic Bias to WP:N
|
| Adaptations of works |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Adaptations of works
|
| Notability presumptions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Notability presumptions
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016
|
| RFC on creation of consensus standard |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#RFC on creation of consensus standard
|
| The definition of significant coverage |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#The definition of significant coverage
|
| Waiting for a few days/contacting creator before nomination |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Waiting for a few days/contacting creator before nomination
|
| Question here regarding sorting via {{notability}} |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Question here regarding sorting via {{notability}}
|
| Proposed small change to RS |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58#Proposed small change to RS
|
| GNG v NSPORT |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#GNG v NSPORT
|
| Television articles |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Television articles
|
| WP:MILHIST |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#WP:MILHIST
|
| Relevant Discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Relevant Discussion
|
| Italian Bicycle manufacturers |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Italian Bicycle manufacturers
|
| Test: If the subject ceased to exist tomorrow, would it still be notable? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Test: If the subject ceased to exist tomorrow, would it still be notable?
|
| Does the GNG apply to academics? |
57 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Does the GNG apply to academics?
|
| Are future films/games/recordings notable? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Are future films/games/recordings notable?
|
| Notability: must "significant coverage" be mainstream? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Notability: must "significant coverage" be mainstream?
|
| Notability: Assessing source independence |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Notability: Assessing source independence
|
| True or false: Primary sources are not sufficient to establish notability |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#True or false: Primary sources are not sufficient to establish notability
|
| place of power |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#place of power
|
| YouTube channels |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#YouTube channels
|
| Alternative facts and the notability of terminology |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Alternative facts and the notability of terminology
|
| Notabilities of distinctive topics using similar names |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Notabilities of distinctive topics using similar names
|
| Notability of Timeline articles |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Notability of Timeline articles
|
| Reviews |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Reviews
|
| Non-notable subject sharing name and article with notable subject |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Non-notable subject sharing name and article with notable subject
|
| Notability Guidelines for Theatre Productions |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 59#Notability Guidelines for Theatre Productions
|
| Promote to policy? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Promote to policy?
|
| International Notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#International Notability
|
| Update: Closure on the WP:NSPORTS discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Update: Closure on the WP:NSPORTS discussion
|
| Proposal to have option via user preferences to disable/opt-out cross-wiki search results |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Proposal to have option via user preferences to disable/opt-out cross-wiki search results
|
| Wildfires, Notability, and Not News RfC |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Wildfires, Notability, and Not News RfC
|
| Lede clarification in light of several SNG discussions |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Lede clarification in light of several SNG discussions
|
| Lead |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Lead
|
| NCORP |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#NCORP
|
| How much weight do we assign to the fact that a subject page has a wikipage in other languages |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#How much weight do we assign to the fact that a subject page has a wikipage in other languages
|
| Paid editing, Advertorials, and Reference bombing |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Paid editing, Advertorials, and Reference bombing
|
| Notability criteria |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Notability criteria
|
| Has the growth of social media changed how topics become notable? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Has the growth of social media changed how topics become notable?
|
| RFC at Template talk:Notability#Notability tags restored on articles after AfD |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#RFC at Template talk:Notability#Notability tags restored on articles after AfD
|
| RFC on whether WP:PROF is subordinate to the GNG |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#RFC on whether WP:PROF is subordinate to the GNG
|
| Discussion at NSPORTS |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Discussion at NSPORTS
|
| Notability of individual scientific papers |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Notability of individual scientific papers
|
| Notability of fiction and fiction-universe reference works |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Notability of fiction and fiction-universe reference works
|
| Fictional characters? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Fictional characters?
|
| Is the following claim really credible? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Is the following claim really credible?
|
| Interpretation of GNG v SSG, especially at AfD |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Interpretation of GNG v SSG, especially at AfD
|
| How in-depth do sources need to get? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#How in-depth do sources need to get?
|
| Notability considerations for leaders of U.S. recognized Native American tribe |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Notability considerations for leaders of U.S. recognized Native American tribe
|
| "Notability and lists and Lead and selection..."?!?!? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#"Notability and lists and Lead and selection..."?!?!?
|
| Nutshell |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Nutshell
|
| Multiple sources and the definition of organizations |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Multiple sources and the definition of organizations
|
| Censorship |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Censorship
|
| AfD request |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#AfD request
|
| RfC on journalistic independence |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#RfC on journalistic independence
|
| Please clarify confusing notability issue for AfD purposes |
265 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#Please clarify confusing notability issue for AfD purposes
|
| NCORP pre-RfC discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#NCORP pre-RfC discussion
|
| RfC on small (but important) change to LISTN |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#RfC on small (but important) change to LISTN
|
| Editorial Integrity |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 60#Editorial Integrity
|
| Unclear or misleading content |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#Unclear or misleading content
|
| Relative Notability |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#Relative Notability
|
| Linking non-notable subjects to their WikiData entries |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#Linking non-notable subjects to their WikiData entries
|
| RfC to raise NCORP standards |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#RfC to raise NCORP standards
|
| How niche is too niche? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#How niche is too niche?
|
| rcb team |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#rcb team
|
| Sekou Franklin? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#Sekou Franklin?
|
| RFC to update NOTDIR to preempt GNG for lists of transportation service destinations |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#RFC to update NOTDIR to preempt GNG for lists of transportation service destinations
|
| Massive change to WP:CORP proposed |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#Massive change to WP:CORP proposed
|
| "Best-selling book" as a notability criterion |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#"Best-selling book" as a notability criterion
|
| Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline? |
105 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?
|
| We need to set a minimum rate of article creation |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#We need to set a minimum rate of article creation
|
| Notability of local elections in the UK |
59 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Notability of local elections in the UK
|
| I'm not going to edit-war, but... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#I'm not going to edit-war, but...
|
| What is the minimum expectation from Wikipedia to post a biography of a doctor |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#What is the minimum expectation from Wikipedia to post a biography of a doctor
|
| Clarify "Reliable Source" in this Context |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Clarify "Reliable Source" in this Context
|
| unfair notability |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 61#unfair notability
|
| Syndicated stories |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Syndicated stories
|
| LISTN |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#LISTN
|
| Does notability in another language's Wikipedia automatically mean a subject is notable enough for an article in the English wikipedia? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Does notability in another language's Wikipedia automatically mean a subject is notable enough for an article in the English wikipedia?
|
| Existence of sources as a notability test |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Existence of sources as a notability test
|
| Benefit of the doubt |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Benefit of the doubt
|
| Edit proposal to solve confusion. |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Edit proposal to solve confusion.
|
| Notability of this TV show |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Notability of this TV show
|
| Proposal to modify the general notability guideline |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Proposal to modify the general notability guideline
|
| Proposal to swap "Alma mater" for "Education" in Template:Infobox person |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Proposal to swap "Alma mater" for "Education" in Template:Infobox person
|
| Proposal to change "articles and lists" to just "articles" in the lead section |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Proposal to change "articles and lists" to just "articles" in the lead section
|
| Notable within a community? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Notable within a community?
|
| "Notable enough to represent a decade" ??? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#"Notable enough to represent a decade" ???
|
| Example addition |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Example addition
|
| Local sources, again |
65 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Local sources, again
|
| Notability is geared towards the white male perspective |
317 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 63#Notability is geared towards the white male perspective
|
| Is there a contradiction in other policies and essays? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Is there a contradiction in other policies and essays?
|
| Lists of notable Alumni different for different languages, combine? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Lists of notable Alumni different for different languages, combine?
|
| Request for comment on Wikipedia:Interviews |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Request for comment on Wikipedia:Interviews
|
| RfC of possible interest |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#RfC of possible interest
|
| Notability of subjects prohibited from publication. |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Notability of subjects prohibited from publication.
|
| Notability for a cryptocurrency |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 62#Notability for a cryptocurrency
|
| Interviews are not independent sources, and cannot be used to satisfy the WP:GNG |
159 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Interviews are not independent sources, and cannot be used to satisfy the WP:GNG
|
| WP: NTEMP |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 63#WP: NTEMP
|
| Question |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 63#Question
|
| WP:NSTEM |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#WP:NSTEM
|
| Notability of Olympians |
58 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Notability of Olympians
|
| Notability Guidelines for Scientific Subjects |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Notability Guidelines for Scientific Subjects
|
| Animals |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Animals
|
| New user essay |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#New user essay
|
| Notability of Guinness World Record holders |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Notability of Guinness World Record holders
|
| Suggestion: link to WP:NOT in "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Suggestion: link to WP:NOT in "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article"
|
| RfC on Notability (academics) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#RfC on Notability (academics)
|
| Reviving an old argument about "significant coverage" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Reviving an old argument about "significant coverage"
|
| Where does coverage in alternative weekly papers fall for notability validation? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Where does coverage in alternative weekly papers fall for notability validation?
|
| Notability double standards |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Notability double standards
|
| Discussion on independence of two sources with same owner |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Discussion on independence of two sources with same owner
|
| industry plants are a loophole in the notability policy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#industry plants are a loophole in the notability policy
|
| Current interpretations of WP:NCORP fail to adequately evaluate Art Galleries |
387 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#Current interpretations of WP:NCORP fail to adequately evaluate Art Galleries
|
| Discussion of specific sources for notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Discussion of specific sources for notability
|
| We should be ashamed of ourselves |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#We should be ashamed of ourselves
|
| Establishing notability of older material |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Establishing notability of older material
|
| Small change to WP:ARTIST |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Small change to WP:ARTIST
|
| Categories with the most company articles tagged for failing NCORP and lacking references |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Categories with the most company articles tagged for failing NCORP and lacking references
|
| Fictional characters |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 64#Fictional characters
|
| RfC about independent sources for academic notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#RfC about independent sources for academic notability
|
| Notification of Discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Notification of Discussion
|
| What is a "legally recognized place"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#What is a "legally recognized place"?
|
| Discussion of User:Rosguill/NPPRS, a list of sources for new page patrollers |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Discussion of User:Rosguill/NPPRS, a list of sources for new page patrollers
|
| Train stations |
111 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Train stations
|
| Page |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Page
|
| Linguistic research on AFD discussions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Linguistic research on AFD discussions
|
| What Wikipedia Editors Determine as 'Acceptable' Notability |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#What Wikipedia Editors Determine as 'Acceptable' Notability
|
| Link for multiple sources |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Link for multiple sources
|
| "Wikipedia's notability policy" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#"Wikipedia's notability policy" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
| Meta Working Group Notability Recommendation |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Meta Working Group Notability Recommendation
|
| Notability help at AFD? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 65#Notability help at AFD?
|
| Is there a guideline for individual works of art? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Is there a guideline for individual works of art?
|
| Audience section should be moved here since it is relevant to broad notability not just NORG |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Audience section should be moved here since it is relevant to broad notability not just NORG
|
| How notable does a comic book character got to be |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#How notable does a comic book character got to be
|
| Notability standards for software and apps |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Notability standards for software and apps
|
| Where would I ask about the "Education Investor Awards"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Where would I ask about the "Education Investor Awards"?
|
| Using local news media to establish notability -- some questions |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Using local news media to establish notability -- some questions
|
| Notability policies are failing noticeably on the Italian Wikipedia |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Notability policies are failing noticeably on the Italian Wikipedia
|
| chemicals |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#chemicals
|
| Adding guidance related to stubby articles that just meet GNG/SNG |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Adding guidance related to stubby articles that just meet GNG/SNG
|
| Village deities / local religious customs |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Village deities / local religious customs
|
| Lists of fictional animals and WP:LISTN |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Lists of fictional animals and WP:LISTN
|
| More fiction |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#More fiction
|
| Adding a 4th bullet to WP:NOPAGE |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Adding a 4th bullet to WP:NOPAGE
|
| General information about companies is not promotion |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#General information about companies is not promotion
|
| Notability during Splitting |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 66#Notability during Splitting
|
| A Rosetta Stone? |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#A Rosetta Stone?
|
| If an article exist in other Language, can it be considered notable? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#If an article exist in other Language, can it be considered notable?
|
| LISTN's applicability to Leicester churches issues |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#LISTN's applicability to Leicester churches issues
|
| Relevant discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#Relevant discussion
|
| American Physiological Society "Living History" subjects |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#American Physiological Society "Living History" subjects
|
| Notability for Lists |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#Notability for Lists
|
| Create a policy for Gods and religions? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#Create a policy for Gods and religions?
|
| Notable or noted? |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#Notable or noted?
|
| red links |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 67#red links
|
| Notability confirmation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#Notability confirmation
|
| How do GNG and SNG interact? Do both need to be satisfied for notability purposes? |
330 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 69#How do GNG and SNG interact? Do both need to be satisfied for notability purposes?
|
| Discussion at WP:VPP |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#Discussion at WP:VPP
|
| Chemicals |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#Chemicals
|
| Scope of notability criteria |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#Scope of notability criteria
|
| Wikipedia:Wikiproject Notability |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#Wikipedia:Wikiproject Notability
|
| pointless essay linked to by its creator |
75 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#pointless essay linked to by its creator
|
| notability |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#notability
|
| SIGCOV is badly explained |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 69#SIGCOV is badly explained
|
| statues |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 68#statues
|
| Asking for notability before creating an article |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 69#Asking for notability before creating an article
|
| Specific question re: trivial mention and self-published sources |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Specific question re: trivial mention and self-published sources
|
| Is WP:SUSTAINED for websites as well? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Is WP:SUSTAINED for websites as well?
|
| NPEOPLE vs NORG for artists collectives |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 69#NPEOPLE vs NORG for artists collectives
|
| notability of porn awards |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 69#notability of porn awards
|
| Daniela Tablante |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Daniela Tablante
|
| Software notability guidelines |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Software notability guidelines
|
| Sources that cover a topic in its entirety |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Sources that cover a topic in its entirety
|
| Notability of Referees |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Notability of Referees
|
| Need clearer consensus interpretation of significant coverage and audience. |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Need clearer consensus interpretation of significant coverage and audience.
|
| Notability is Wikipedia's Achilles heel. |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Notability is Wikipedia's Achilles heel.
|
| Notability optimization |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Notability optimization
|
| Tidying up redundant language in WP:GNG |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Tidying up redundant language in WP:GNG
|
| Notability of things popular with kids and people too young to edit Wikipedia |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Notability of things popular with kids and people too young to edit Wikipedia
|
| SNG change |
649 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 71#SNG change
|
| Unreliable sources for notability |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Unreliable sources for notability
|
| Context of "Primary" sources |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Context of "Primary" sources
|
| Aligning WP:Notability (periodicals), WP:Notability (media), and WP:Notability (academic journals) |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Aligning WP:Notability (periodicals), WP:Notability (media), and WP:Notability (academic journals)
|
| RfC: For biography leads, do we prefer recent images or images from when the subject was most notable? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#RfC: For biography leads, do we prefer recent images or images from when the subject was most notable?
|
| Awards? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Awards?
|
| RfC on NCRIC started |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#RfC on NCRIC started
|
| Statutes |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Statutes
|
| How to resolve a notability dispute if those arguing against notability won't open an AfD |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#How to resolve a notability dispute if those arguing against notability won't open an AfD
|
| Over-reliance on secondary sources |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Over-reliance on secondary sources
|
| Elephant in the room |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Elephant in the room
|
| "MOS:N" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#"MOS:N" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
| Are "first person of X race/gender to do Y" statements notable? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Are "first person of X race/gender to do Y" statements notable?
|
| Notable town of residence? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 70#Notable town of residence?
|
| Request for Comment on the Subject-specific notability guidelines (SNG) |
116 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Request for Comment on the Subject-specific notability guidelines (SNG)
|
| Are ONE and the ONLY ONE software doing thing from science / engineering article notable? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Are ONE and the ONLY ONE software doing thing from science / engineering article notable?
|
| SIGCOV's 2 examples are a very broad range |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#SIGCOV's 2 examples are a very broad range
|
| Notability and due weight of failed lawsuits |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Notability and due weight of failed lawsuits
|
| WP:NOTTEMPORARY vs. WP:SUSTAINED |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#WP:NOTTEMPORARY vs. WP:SUSTAINED
|
| WP:NEXIST |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#WP:NEXIST
|
| Problems on notability of Indonesian rail lines, stations, and services |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Problems on notability of Indonesian rail lines, stations, and services
|
| Interviews and WP:SIGCOV |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Interviews and WP:SIGCOV
|
| its own |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#its own
|
| Glynne Steele |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Glynne Steele
|
| Does an article cover one subject or one topic? |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Does an article cover one subject or one topic?
|
| Merits, Warrants |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Merits, Warrants
|
| A possible wp:notability decoder ring? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#A possible wp:notability decoder ring?
|
| Appropriate SNG for record labels/recording companies |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Appropriate SNG for record labels/recording companies
|
| GNG formatting |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#GNG formatting
|
| Does link rot make notability expire? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Does link rot make notability expire?
|
| Adding one new thing to the current SNG text |
158 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Adding one new thing to the current SNG text
|
| NSPORT proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#NSPORT proposal
|
| Clarification |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Clarification
|
| Do manufacturers qualify for WP:NOTABILITY |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Do manufacturers qualify for WP:NOTABILITY
|
| Wikipedia:Your alma mater is not your ticket to Wikipedia is outdated and incorrect |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Wikipedia:Your alma mater is not your ticket to Wikipedia is outdated and incorrect
|
| Write an Article on an Assistant Professor in Cotton University |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Write an Article on an Assistant Professor in Cotton University
|
| Are astronauts notable ? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Are astronauts notable ?
|
| Stand-alone list |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Stand-alone list
|
| New explanatory supplement on "significant coverage" |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#New explanatory supplement on "significant coverage"
|
| Notability: Schools, residency, village or public areas |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Notability: Schools, residency, village or public areas
|
| Should WP:NMEDIA be removed from the SNG sidebar? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Should WP:NMEDIA be removed from the SNG sidebar?
|
| Do all individual books qualify as notable as long as they've been reviewed somewhere? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Do all individual books qualify as notable as long as they've been reviewed somewhere?
|
| Q about chief constables |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Q about chief constables
|
| Notability of glossaries |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 72#Notability of glossaries
|
| Is notability really a test of whether something warrants an article? |
62 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Is notability really a test of whether something warrants an article?
|
| Tertiary sources |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Tertiary sources
|
| Use of reference books as indications of notability |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Use of reference books as indications of notability
|
| RFC on WP:WikiProject Religion/Notability guide and WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES as policy at AFD |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#RFC on WP:WikiProject Religion/Notability guide and WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES as policy at AFD
|
| Do any of the SNGs overrule WP:GNG? |
67 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Do any of the SNGs overrule WP:GNG?
|
| Television appearances |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Television appearances
|
| Sports proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Sports proposal
|
| "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"
|
| RfC notice for establishing Wikipedia:Notability (television) as a guideline |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#RfC notice for establishing Wikipedia:Notability (television) as a guideline
|
| Um... |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Um...
|
| WP:VPP § Notability (cryptocurrencies) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#WP:VPP § Notability (cryptocurrencies)
|
| Schools & notability |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Schools & notability
|
| Definition of "significant coverage" |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Definition of "significant coverage"
|
| "Wikipedia:Inclusion criteria" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#"Wikipedia:Inclusion criteria" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
| "User:Inclusionist~enwiki/test5" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#"User:Inclusionist~enwiki/test5" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
| Old biographical dictionaries |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Old biographical dictionaries
|
| Sports venues |
81 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Sports venues
|
| Semi-duplicates |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Semi-duplicates
|
| Notability of foods |
111 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Notability of foods
|
| What are "Lists of X of Y"? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#What are "Lists of X of Y"?
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (weather) has an RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 73#Wikipedia:Notability (weather) has an RFC
|
| Fuzziness in notability, standalone, and article content descriptions |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Fuzziness in notability, standalone, and article content descriptions
|
| Editorial interviews as "primary sources" |
98 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Editorial interviews as "primary sources"
|
| Top librarian/museum curator of a national organisation |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Top librarian/museum curator of a national organisation
|
| GNG vs SNG: a case study |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#GNG vs SNG: a case study
|
| Interviews of subject from a RS |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Interviews of subject from a RS
|
| Garbled the page |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Garbled the page
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2022 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2022
|
| Notability of television episodes |
90 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#Notability of television episodes
|
| Alternate wiki within Wikipedia with different rules |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Alternate wiki within Wikipedia with different rules
|
| Why not a policy yet? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Why not a policy yet?
|
| Election contests within a General Election |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#Election contests within a General Election
|
| Local coverage |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#Local coverage
|
| 2022 |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 74#2022
|
| Notability in Singapore |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#Notability in Singapore
|
| WP:NEXIST |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#WP:NEXIST
|
| Individual local elections |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#Individual local elections
|
| Template:Sources exist nominated for deletion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#Template:Sources exist nominated for deletion
|
| Notability of train stations |
303 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Notability of train stations
|
| An old-timer is concerned |
83 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#An old-timer is concerned
|
| Inherent notability |
63 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 75#Inherent notability
|
| Drafting a new rail station SNG RFC |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Drafting a new rail station SNG RFC
|
| Edit warring on guideline page |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Edit warring on guideline page
|
| RFC on notability of rural localities (e.g., Iranian ābādī) |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#RFC on notability of rural localities (e.g., Iranian ābādī)
|
| Olympic Art Competition |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Olympic Art Competition
|
| 216 Iranian "village" articles nominated for deletion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#216 Iranian "village" articles nominated for deletion
|
| GNG plural |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#GNG plural
|
| WP:NOTDIRECTORY has an RFC |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#WP:NOTDIRECTORY has an RFC
|
| Wikimania starts Thursday |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Wikimania starts Thursday
|
| Basketball SNG RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Basketball SNG RFC
|
| "Wikipedia articles only" list criterion doesn't establish notability |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#"Wikipedia articles only" list criterion doesn't establish notability
|
| WP:GNG in sports articles deletion nominations |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#WP:GNG in sports articles deletion nominations
|
| Summary box |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Summary box
|
| WP:SUSTAINED and content within articles. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#WP:SUSTAINED and content within articles.
|
| Concepts which are fall under lexical gaps and notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Concepts which are fall under lexical gaps and notability
|
| RfC on Article creation at scale |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#RfC on Article creation at scale
|
| Sister projects |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Sister projects
|
| Does winning a national industry filmmaking award satisfy notability criteria? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Does winning a national industry filmmaking award satisfy notability criteria?
|
| Is a source sigcov in the following circumstances |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Is a source sigcov in the following circumstances
|
| Advocate Abdullah Bhuiyan Badal |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 76#Advocate Abdullah Bhuiyan Badal
|
| Can failing SNG while meeting GNG be sufficient to prevent an article from existing? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Can failing SNG while meeting GNG be sufficient to prevent an article from existing?
|
| Expand notability criteria "significant coverage" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Expand notability criteria "significant coverage"
|
| How many sources: Part 2 |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#How many sources: Part 2
|
| Partially reverting bold change and asking for consensus review per prior discussion |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Partially reverting bold change and asking for consensus review per prior discussion
|
| GNG or Specific |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#GNG or Specific
|
| Wording improvements |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Wording improvements
|
| RFC on the use of maps and charts in Wikipedia articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RFC on the use of maps and charts in Wikipedia articles
|
| RfC on periodicals and publishing companies |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RfC on periodicals and publishing companies
|
| RfC on wording of GNG guidelines, and SIGCOV in particular |
58 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RfC on wording of GNG guidelines, and SIGCOV in particular
|
| WP:N and WP:IINFO |
105 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#WP:N and WP:IINFO
|
| RfC regarding individual area codes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RfC regarding individual area codes
|
| Minimum Number of Secondary Sources |
146 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Minimum Number of Secondary Sources
|
| Do subject-specific notability guidelines trump the general guideline? |
65 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Do subject-specific notability guidelines trump the general guideline?
|
| Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) has an RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) has an RFC
|
| Notability and list selection criteria |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Notability and list selection criteria
|
| WP:NOTDIRECTORY has an RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#WP:NOTDIRECTORY has an RFC
|
| Concerns about NBAND #5 |
78 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#Concerns about NBAND #5
|
| RfC at WP:NOT |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RfC at WP:NOT
|
| Confusing passage |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Confusing passage
|
| "Wikipedia:15MOF" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#"Wikipedia:15MOF" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
| Secondary Source Justification |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Secondary Source Justification
|
| RfC on the journal notability essay |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RfC on the journal notability essay
|
| RFC regarding the life-extension practices of Bryan Johnson |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#RFC regarding the life-extension practices of Bryan Johnson
|
| RfC: Should relevant notability guidelines be edited to clarify that notability can be used as a criterion for inclusion in embedded lists? |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#RfC: Should relevant notability guidelines be edited to clarify that notability can be used as a criterion for inclusion in embedded lists?
|
| Notability guideline for police/law enforcement/similar bodies |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 77#Notability guideline for police/law enforcement/similar bodies
|
| Defining coverage |
170 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Defining coverage
|
| "Stand-alone list" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#"Stand-alone list" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
| Jit Bose |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#Jit Bose
|
| Does material unambiguously derived from press releases count towards GNG? If multiple news pieces run some subset of that material, is that "multiple sources"? Does that satisfy WP:SUSTAINED? |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#Does material unambiguously derived from press releases count towards GNG? If multiple news pieces run some subset of that material, is that "multiple sources"? Does that satisfy WP:SUSTAINED?
|
| Notability (academics) |
105 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Notability (academics)
|
| 1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake should be linked somehow in the NEXIST section |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 78#1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake should be linked somehow in the NEXIST section
|
| Rewriting the introduction of this guideline |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Rewriting the introduction of this guideline
|
| Do we need "rebuttably"? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Do we need "rebuttably"?
|
| Schools notability discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Schools notability discussion
|
| Should we clarify GNG regarding compound-topic article titles/topics? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Should we clarify GNG regarding compound-topic article titles/topics?
|
| What does "presumed notable" actually mean? |
53 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#What does "presumed notable" actually mean?
|
| Regarding List of programmes broadcast by CITV notability |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Regarding List of programmes broadcast by CITV notability
|
| Academics |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Academics
|
| Is there a notability standard for legislation? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Is there a notability standard for legislation?
|
| Notability standard for restaurants? |
122 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Notability standard for restaurants?
|
| Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) § Notability reform |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) § Notability reform
|
| GNG and sources relation to claims of notability |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#GNG and sources relation to claims of notability
|
| Essay on SIGCOV |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Essay on SIGCOV
|
| Politician Notability |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Politician Notability
|
| Upward heritability of notability |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 79#Upward heritability of notability
|
| Notability of stats-only articles that aren't identified as "list" articles |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Notability of stats-only articles that aren't identified as "list" articles
|
| Kent Hughes |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Kent Hughes
|
| Deleting |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Deleting
|
| Question about schools |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Question about schools
|
| Technically meeting notability |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Technically meeting notability
|
| Reviews posted on social media (e.g. YouTube) instead of traditional media |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Reviews posted on social media (e.g. YouTube) instead of traditional media
|
| Cannot create new articles without having to use this |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Cannot create new articles without having to use this
|
| Biology |
269 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 81#Biology
|
| Is it unusual if another language's Wikipedia has a stricter notability criteria than the English Wikipedia? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Is it unusual if another language's Wikipedia has a stricter notability criteria than the English Wikipedia?
|
| Notability of Unicode codepoints |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Notability of Unicode codepoints
|
| Notability of the decendants of Prince Abdulrahman living in the USA |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Notability of the decendants of Prince Abdulrahman living in the USA
|
| Notability of linked content |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Notability of linked content
|
| Minor phrasing in WP:NEXIST |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Minor phrasing in WP:NEXIST
|
| Are laws/acts of Parliament presumed notable? |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 80#Are laws/acts of Parliament presumed notable?
|
| Product catalog/discography/filmography of a publisher |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 81#Product catalog/discography/filmography of a publisher
|
| Wikipedia:Notability (species) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 81#Wikipedia:Notability (species)
|
| Relation between Wikipedia:Notability (numbers) and GNG |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 81#Relation between Wikipedia:Notability (numbers) and GNG
|
| RfC: Notability and British Rail stations |
277 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#RfC: Notability and British Rail stations
|
| Can we please settle on some guidance for interviews? |
238 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 82#Can we please settle on some guidance for interviews?
|
| The opening line makes no gosh darn sense |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 81#The opening line makes no gosh darn sense
|
| Magazines and newspapers |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 81#Magazines and newspapers
|
| Notability feels weird |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 82#Notability feels weird
|
| Straw poll on our jargon |
66 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 82#Straw poll on our jargon
|
| At some point this just needs to be fixed |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 82#At some point this just needs to be fixed
|
| Discussion on suggestion to revise the SNG WP:NBAND |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 82#Discussion on suggestion to revise the SNG WP:NBAND
|
| Challenged notability template |
61 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Challenged notability template
|
| Notability and oldest people |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Notability and oldest people
|
| Notability and youngest people |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Notability and youngest people
|
| Standalone list being to introduce contents unsuitable for an article |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Standalone list being to introduce contents unsuitable for an article
|
| Requiring a neutral source |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Requiring a neutral source
|
| RFC: School Notability Criteria |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#RFC: School Notability Criteria
|
| Changes to WP:NMOTORSPORTS |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Changes to WP:NMOTORSPORTS
|
| Circular definitions |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:Notability#Circular definitions
|
