Wikipedia talk:List of infoboxes/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:List of infoboxes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Too big
It's great that Underlying lk and others have reactivated and updated this page, but it's now massive, and slow to open in my modest netbook I think the time has come to split it; preferably into at least 4 or 5 parts. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Andy, I understand the issue but I'm against the idea for two reasons: first, having everything on the same page makes it easier to find the infobox you're looking for by just using the browser's search function, which makes it a lot easier to maintain the list since for now it has to be updated manually; second, the page is large indeed but not exceptionally so, there are mainspace articles of a similar size like 2013 in film for example. I'm using a very old computer as my main desktop and it does takes a while to load, but weighed against the benefit of keeping everything on the same page I think it's better to leave it as it is.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps I was insufficiently clear; the page is virtually unusable to me (and thus others). The existence of other pages of problematic length does not justify this one (nor vice versa), and that page should be split also. The searchability requirement could be met by having a page which transcludes the subpages. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't think of that possibility. Not a bad idea, I agree to any changes as long as the full list is easily searchable. Cheers, eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- How does that make anything better? The same amount of data is being served to the user, if it was slower before it will still be slow now. --CyberXRef☎ 00:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- It will be possible to view the sub-pages individually, and editing will be done at the sub-page level. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- The html for the page is 773KB, so delivery will depend on the speed of one's connection, but it's comparable to an article with a lot of pictures. However the cached version of the page only takes about 200 ms to serve, so the problem will come in editing and especially in previewing those edits. The decision to transclude subpages which may be individually edited is sensible and a good work-around. Let's hope that has alleviated the problem for most editors. Incidentally, I dropped the contents into a text-editor and cleaned up, then imported into a spreadsheet so that I could get a total. Leaving aside the 141,726 Infobox3cols and 1,834,632 Infobox which shouldn't appear in articles, there are an impressive 3,005,913 transclusions in the list. It's possible that some are transcluded into other infoboxes, but it's an upper bound for the number of articles containing infoboxes. --RexxS (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- It will be possible to view the sub-pages individually, and editing will be done at the sub-page level. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- How does that make anything better? The same amount of data is being served to the user, if it was slower before it will still be slow now. --CyberXRef☎ 00:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't think of that possibility. Not a bad idea, I agree to any changes as long as the full list is easily searchable. Cheers, eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps I was insufficiently clear; the page is virtually unusable to me (and thus others). The existence of other pages of problematic length does not justify this one (nor vice versa), and that page should be split also. The searchability requirement could be met by having a page which transcludes the subpages. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Geobox for buildings
Please see Template talk:Geobox#Use for buildings; I could use some help implementing the proposed changes. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deletion proposals
Now that the page has been subdivided, it's much easier to use and edit - thank you. As a consequence, I've begun to propose redundant and under-used templates for deletion or merger. Please see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 17 and help to decide what should be done in each case. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- And Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 18. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- More today: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 19. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Lots of single-use templates, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 March 2. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- More on March 4 and on March 6, the latter including two large groups. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Bare use of infobox base template
Some articles use {{Infobox}} directly. While that's not prohibited, of course, there's often a more suitable template to use, such as in this edit.
Would it be worth adding a tracking category (if possible) or running a script to list all the articles where this happens?
@Underlying lk, Plastikspork, Frietjes, and Magioladitis: Are you interested? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: It would be useful, but how would a similar list be created? The API doesn't distinguish between directly embedded templates and those called by a wrapper, and the same goes for tracking categories.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know whether, or how, it would be possible - that's why I'm asking here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:20, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 125#Tracking direct use of templates; someone there suggested to use a dump analyser. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
@Underlying lk, Plastikspork, Frietjes, and Magioladitis: There is now a list at User:Pigsonthewing/Direct calls to Infobox - 2398 instances! Many are suitable for conversion to infoboxes proper, and some are simply frames for images. Please feel free to strike through items in that list if you convert them (or if you check and nothing needs to be done; in which case, please leave a comment there also). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Need for general academic / professor infobox
There seems to be a need for an infobox for "academic" or "professor"; see the infobox for scientist, used at George M. Church, and ask, what infobox could one use, that would have would similar content (institutions, thesis, students, major works, etc.) for a non-science academic scholar such as C.S. Lewis? If I am missing something, please direct me. If I have indicated an unmet need, please RSVP and suggest a way forward. Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- {{Infobox person}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Why no info box template for crime victim?
Nothing further, except if you might take the time to create one, perhaps from criminal. Le Prof — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.82.39 (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Use {{Infobox person}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please compare {{Infobox person}} to {{Infobox criminal}} and see why I suggest a victim deserves as much respect as a perpetrator. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Here you go: {{Infobox victim}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please compare {{Infobox person}} to {{Infobox criminal}} and see why I suggest a victim deserves as much respect as a perpetrator. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Request of regular, well-informed admins and editors here
Please RSVP with guidance to a wizard or other means to create new infoboxes for consideration. Thank you. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- you have not provided enough information. Frietjes (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Chess..
Template:Infobox chess biography? 6 Person -> 6.3 Sportsperson -> 6.3.5 Other sportsperson? 6 Person -> 6.5 Other person? Axxter99 (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Suggest new infobox for "travelling fair", based on Template:Infobox_circus
Hi,
Was looking for an infobox to include on a page for a travelling steam fair. Can't see anything for funfair, or carnival, nor steam within the current categories listed.
Request / suggest template based on Template:Infobox_circus, with the following additional values, named Template:Infobox_travelling_fair or carnival or similar;
| fair_name = would replace "circus_name"; name of fair
| associates = name of partners, other associates to the fair
| rides = to replace "acts" and give a count of rides available (helps gauge size)
| non-rides = attractions that are present but not rides; food stands, toilets, amusement machines etc.
| home base co-ord = Home base of operations, where maintenance / over-winter storage maintained etc.
Values that can be removed if Template:Infobox_circus is used as base template;
| tent =
| number =
| acts =
| circus_name =
Any thoughts?
Regards
James (UK) (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Unhelpful
Can I nominate "Nesting indicates a wrapper infobox." (with no links) as one of the most unhelpful statements ever on WP. Tigerboy1966 17:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
An infobox template for 'actor'?
Dear fellow editors,
Does anyone else think it strange that there isn't an Infobox template specifically for actors/actresses, since there are so many of them, and in different genres? There already is a template for musical artist, so why not one for actor? Just a thought...
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 10:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- I use infobox person, also for musical artists and composers, - it's well developed and documented. Many people are more than one thing, - why limit? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Gerda,
- Thank you for your prompt reply, and nice to hear from you again.
Of course, the status quo ante is fine. Equally so, there are many actors who are not notable for anything else than their acting. In my simple mind, it wasn't about 'limiting', but about 'recognising'. Also, I still find it very strange that there is an Infobox template for chef, musical artist, but not for actor, despite the almost absurd granularity for sports persons. - With kind regards, and please keep well, Gerda;
- Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 10:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- What I don't see how it would "recognise" them any better? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- ps: I agree that sports people could also go as "person" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Gerda,
- Please forgive me for not being able to explain it better. By providing a dedicated infobox, we are giving recognition to professions such as chef, or astronaut, but not to actor, even though we already have dancer or musical artist who also appear on stage and in films. It seems somewhat illogical to me. Thank you for your patient desire to understand what I meant.
- With kindest regards, as always.
- Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 21:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Officeholder infobox
I have created a number of infoboxes using this template, as well as adding information to other political infoboxes. Particularly for 19th century Virginia politicians, political affiliations often changed, especially due to the short-lived nature of some political parties (like the Know Nothing Party before the American Civil War and the Readjuster Party after it). The commonly-used Officeholder template does not accept multiple political parties, generating error messages if I try party1, party2, etc. I managed to list multiple parties using a "br" in articles such as last month's concerning Chester D. Hubbard. That method, however, does not show the relevant dates, which would facilitate navigation as well as understanding of these minor parties. The problem is common in 19th century Virginia political figures, and becomes more acute in the case of articles such as Alexander H. H. Stuart, on which I worked today.Jweaver28 (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Redirects for discussion
Interested persons are requested to comment on the following redirects for deletion relevant to this project page: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 1#Old list of infoboxes subpages, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 1#Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/History and Culture, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 1#Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox Mini blind. --Bsherr (talk) 23:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Infobox for geographic region?
Is there an infobox for a geographic region or area? For an example of a page that could use such a template, see Empty_diagonal. I put the Infobox country geography on the page for now, but it appears to be for a country, and not a geographic region of a country. JonathanFreed (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Overlap person, place, event
Topic | Person (Who?) Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Person | Place (Where?) Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Geography_and_place NOT Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Place | Event Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/History_and_events#Event NOT Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Event |
---|---|---|---|
Health and fitness |
|
||
Religion | |||
Society and social science | Template:Infobox military person | Template:Infobox military conflict | |
Science and nature | Template:Infobox astronomical object, Template:Infobox galaxy | Template:Infobox astronomical event
Template:Infobox spaceflight |
77.191.145.69 (talk) 21:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Movement
Is there any infobox for any historical movements. See for example about Silk Letter Movement. Please lemme know.Aafiii (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)