Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Journalism

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Journalism and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

WT:JOURN

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 120 days

Midwest Radio Network

It seems to me that Midwest Radio Network is not a news media company as it pretends. The scores of news web sites it publishes practically scream coordinated disinformation. Perhaps there was once a genuine Australian media company with that name. But right now it looks like disinformation. Which Wikproject would best review this article? It is odd that the wiki-article for a media company which runs scores of sites is not being monitored by WikiProject Journalism, so I'm posting here. -- M.boli (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFC at RSN: The Telegraph on trans issues

Hello! There is an RFC at the reliable sources noticeboard regarding a subject relevant to this Wikiproject. Loki (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:ABC News (United States)#Requested move 1 August 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ABC News (United States)#Requested move 1 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 07:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:All-Russia State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company#Requested move 12 August 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:All-Russia State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company#Requested move 12 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Michael Savage

Michael Savage has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the reliability of the Jewish Chronicle

There is a discussion at the Reliable sources/Noticeboard about the reliability of the Jewish Chronicle, interested editors can see the discussion here WP:RSN#RFC Jewish Chronicle. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for The American Israelite

The American Israelite has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We suggest a new article topic

There is currently no article on The Foreign Press Association London, which appears mentioned, for the regular journalism awards it gives, in the en.wikipedia articles for Isobel Yeung, Nazenin Ansari, Oliver Burkeman, Ramita Navai, Bénédicte Paviot, Fiona Harvey, S. J. Goldsmith, and others.

Note, there exists a well-cited WP page for the Hollywood FPA (of course), but also one for a very sparsely referenced Turkish FPA. These are mentioned in particular, (i) to state that if the Turkish is notable, then the variously referenced one in London surely is, and (ii) to note that finding other references to FPA London in WP is challenging, because of the poor search utilities, which, as it stands, return many hits of the Hollywood FPA, and then the many hits of the individual search terms. (Also at issue is whether, in articles, the name appears as FPA London, London FPA, and with or without "The", hyphens, etc.)

Returning to FPA London, per se: apart from its widely recognised award-granting function, and its Observer status on the National Committee for the Safety of Journalists, it is a not-for-profit "Friendly Society", and the UK Press Card Authority providing the accreditation to thousands of international correspondents that gives them access to Royal and Parliamentary (and other high level government) events, briefings and film opportunities.

According to its website, see following, it is the "first and oldest association of foreign journalists in the world, founded in 1888", a history of sufficient interest to appear as the subject of a book volume, see:

Goldsmith, S.J., ed. (1988). Britain in the Eye of the World: The Foreign Press Association in London, 1888-1988. London: Foreign Press Association. ISBN 9780905734019..

Here is the organisation's current web page.

We suggest creation of a short stub, which for regular editors can easily be accomplished after creating a page, adding a temporary

tag, and revealing the links to the news, newspaper, etc. source types, to proceed. 73.211.140.61 (talk) 02:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Neal Boortz

Neal Boortz has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources noticeboard discussion on a zine/magazine called Indie Vision Music

There is currently a discussion about its reliability. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Indie_Vision_Music Graywalls (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]