Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Manipur
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page is a notice board for things particularly relevant to Wikipedians working on articles on Manipur.
| ||||
New Page Patrol
[edit]
- New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles, including Manipur related articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. --John B123 (talk) 13:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
[edit]Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
MOS:GIVENNAME
[edit]MOS:GIVENNAME clearly overrides Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#People with the same surname (currently MOS:SAMESURNAME), but we don't have an entry to recommend usage for the Meitei people. See Talk:Licypriya Kangujam#First name/second name where it's unclear what to choose. Any advice, preferably based on good sources, would be welcome. See also Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#MOS:GIVENNAME needs an entry for Meitei names (Manipur), since advice should be written at MOS:GIVENNAME once there's a chance of consensus based on sources. Boud (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)