Wikipedia talk:Featured article removal candidates/This Charming Man
- Do not list articles that have recently been promoted—such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period. - This article was made featured around a month ago. Please read the FARC guidelines before listing an article. exolon 17:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Do you consider a month to be "recently"? LordViD 18:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- I do, but concede that 'recently' is a bit of a wooly term, subject to interpretation. We could possibly use a more concrete time period. exolon 18:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Also, checking the history of the article, there were only 4 edits between FA being granted and it's listing on the front page (which triggered many more). So in terms of edit history, it's a very recent promotion. exolon 18:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- My mistake - 8 changes. Confusion arose as the FA templates on the talk and article pages were added at different times. exolon 01:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Also, checking the history of the article, there were only 4 edits between FA being granted and it's listing on the front page (which triggered many more). So in terms of edit history, it's a very recent promotion. exolon 18:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- I do, but concede that 'recently' is a bit of a wooly term, subject to interpretation. We could possibly use a more concrete time period. exolon 18:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Do you consider a month to be "recently"? LordViD 18:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Do not list articles that have recently been promoted—such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period. - This article was made featured around a month ago. Please read the FARC guidelines before listing an article. exolon 17:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The concrete time period, though unnoficial, is generally around three months. This nomination is too early, and it has been removed. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- I am not aware of such a rule (official or unofficial) and been so bold as to stet the nomination. If the problems are not serious, the vote will be to "keep" anyway. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)