Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/2003 Atlantic hurricane season

Moved unactionable

Oppose - there isn't the bibliography. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 17:06, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pardon? The article has a references section, which passes FA criterion 2c. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just of note, this opposal has been questioned on the 1983 AHS candidacy.^Mitch32^contribs 01:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - I said: there isn't the bibliography. If you'll find some books, call me. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 16:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - No, I doubt there are any books available, given how recent it is. Furthermore, there is no criterion that states book sources are mandatory. This season occurred in the online age, so it should be perfectly acceptable to have all sources online. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        You can search these books? No comment. If there isn't the bibliography, my vote is NO. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 16:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        An Amazon.com search for 2003 Atlantic hurricane season - [1]. There are 6 books, but none are relevant, given all but two are from 2002. You have yet to specify why a book source is needed. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Good. Now create in the page the section Bibliography and add the books :) --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 17:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        None of those books are relevant! I'm not going to add a bibliography when no books are used, and we have to try and find some potentially related books to fill the section. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Ok, so I'm oppose. No comment. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 18:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        You need to provide an actionable reason you oppose this nomination; otherwise, the FA director will ignore your comment. The FA process isn't a voting process. Also, you might want to read this. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Hink, I have to agree with you. I can find no books, and I don't think it would need it anyway. Juliancolton (talk) ^{(Happy New Year!)} 23:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm still oppose. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 15:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        What about the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season? It doesn't have a bibliography area. Almost none of them do. And besides that, if we can't find any books, then how do we go about adding a bibliography? There is no reason that it needs anything more to get this to FA. Juliancolton (talk) ^{(Happy New Year!)} 15:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        This oppose is not based in the featured article criteria and I consider it invalid. Pagra shtak 15:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]