Wikipedia talk:Editing frequency

Configuration

Would it be possible for you to do a quick write-up about how you generated these reports? (Scripts and programs used, where data was obtained, etc.) It's incredibly helpful in case you get hit by a bus or suddenly stomp off from the project. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 18:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Download enwiki stub-meta-history.
Extract the relevant bits.
Write scripts to count.

Extracting the data takes about 80 GB of hard disk space, so not trivial, but still something many people could accomplish. I used Python to write the scripts because it simplified coding the complex data structures. I did have to break up the runs for anons though because Python balked at being asked to store a >1.5 GB data structure in memory. Dragons flight (talk) 20:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some graphs and analysis

I've been playing with this data and made a few graphs that I think highlight some of the trends. The first is straightforward:

The next one is kind of convoluted, but I think it shows something interesting...that the typical level of participation for active users has declined since the period of rapid growth in 2005 and 2006, but has remained fairly stable in 2007 and 2008:

I'm working on an article for the Signpost to summarize the main points of the editing frequency data: User:Ragesoss/Editing frequency stats. Thoughts and/or help are of course welcome.--ragesoss (talk) 02:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2013: where are the stats nowadays?

This page seems to have good data through 2008, but nothing thereafter.

Moreover, the page intro does not specify that this is old archival data, nor where one might go today (if anywhere) to get similar editing frequency data.

I propose that we update the intro to clarify this is some old stats for the years yyyy to 2008, and then say if anything similar is being gathered today. Cheers. N2e (talk) 05:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I spent about half an hour looking thru Wikipedia for the same information, & this page was the most relevant thing I found. Odd that there is no article on the decline in growth of active contributors, not even a mention in History of Wikipedia. However, it took me two queries at Google to find this diagram, which answers N2e's question. (I'm leaving this note to help the next person who comes looking for the same data. Hopefully that diagram will continue to be updated.) -- llywrch (talk) 19:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]