Wikipedia talk:Citation needed/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Nutshell

Should there be a nutshell for this page? If so, I personally think it would be:

{{Nutshell|The "citation needed" tag is used for sections of an article where verification via reliable sources may be necessary.}}

It's probably really shabby wording, but I hope my request for a nutshell makes sense. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:00, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Who do you think will read this page and not already know that? WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

According to the tone of voice used with the response you had written, you're saying the whole definition of "citation needed" is too obvious and therefore should not need a nutshell? But what about summarizing the entirety of said page that explains the entirety of why users insert "citation needed" to seemingly dubious information? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Looks as though a need to address users who tag with "citation needed" rather than just anyone who clicks on said page would be the ones who the audience of the nutshell should be. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

I suspect that the people who would benefit from that nutshell summary won't ever see this page, and that the ones who read this page will not benefit from a nutshell summary. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 April 2021

please 167.142.233.138 (talk) 18:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 July 2021

https://www.profootballhof.com/football-history/birth-of-pro-football/ Is citation 2600:8805:BC82:4D00:F8D0:D29C:9A8B:5F29 (talk) 15:29, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: This appears to be on the wrong page ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Give Examples of Plants Grow in different soil

Moved to Talk:Major soil deposits of India

 – —2d37 (talk) 01:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

If any one can give more examples of plants grown in different soils it will be perfect. Jino Tom Issac (talk) 09:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

I think you've put this on the wrong page. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

As Jino Tom Issac's one other edit was to Major soil deposits of India, I'll move this thread to that article's talk page. —2d37 (talk) 01:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 August 2021

Elaine Harmon was/is my mother which I hope makes me a "reliable source". My name is William Alexander Harmon, thus the Wiki login "Alexharmon". A few years ago I updated this page to include the section about my mom being inducted into the Maryland Women's Hall of Fame. I recently noticed that there is a request for "citation needed". But it appears that I no longer have the permission needed to update the page. Therefore, this request is for the citation to be updated. I am the author of the quote that was placed on my mom's page at the Maryland Women's Hall of Fame website. And, I am the person who nominated her to be considered for inclusion in the Maryland Women's Hall of Fame. My mother's quotation comes directly from statements she made during her life. In conclusion I don't know if the citation should reference the Maryland Women's Heritage Museum, since they are the curators of the Maryland Women's Hall of Fame website, or if the citation should reference me, or if there is another way to satisfy this request. Thanks for your help. Alexharmon (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Alexharmon You have placed this on the wrong page, this is the talk page for the use of the Citation Needed tag. You will want to place this request on the article talk page of the relevant article; I will tell you that you yourself cannot be a source. We need a published reliable source that can be verified. 331dot (talk) 19:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Citation Needed

I found this quote in the article, "each day, each prayer and each significant action by invoking Allah the Merciful and Compassionate, i.e., by reciting Bism-i-llah a-Rahman-i-Rahim. The womb and family ties are characterized by compassion and named after the exalted attribute of Allah "Al-Rahim" (The Compassionate)" from the book, "Considering Compassion: Global Ethics, Human Dignity, and the Compassionate God"on page xvii. I was not able to add this citation because the article is locked.Beherbic (talk) 03:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

I believe you've placed this note on the wrong Talk page. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Photo

Is the photo near the top necessary? I don’t think it really adds anything informative. A. Rosenberg (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Add info on bots working on the citation needed tag

I think adding something about bots that modify citation needed tag can be useful (see User:AnomieBOT/source/tasks/TagDater.pm) Kerbless (talk) 12:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

T-shirt

OK, so it was a photo of me. But, I was wearing my Christmas present T-shirt with the addition of "citation needed" (because my family recognises that I am an avid Wikipedian.) It was a "stretch" for relevance, but, hey. Is User:Smuckola a party pooper? Visit my User page, and you can still see the image, along with several others recording my efforts to be a community-minded Wikipedian, over the years. Happy 21st birthday, Wikipedia; and, thanks, Jimmy! - Peter Ellis - Talk 23:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 May 2022

Is it allowed to use a offline newspaper as the The New York Times January 5 1977 mentions the claim and I think it’s a reliable source at least it’s reliable at colleges Transgenderanimegirl (talk) 15:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it's allowed; The New York Times is considered generally reliable. Also, for future reference, this is the wrong place to ask these kinds of questions; places like the Teahouse might be better for these sorts of questions. ji11720 (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 June 2022

In the intro section, change the |link=Wikipedia:Citation needed to |link=Wikipedia:Citations needed, with an extra s.

Rationale: That paragraph currently renders as

Example: 87 percent of statistics are made up on the spot.^{[citation needed]}

While it's technically correct that sticking a citation needed tag on this page would render like that (links to the current page are transformed into bold), it's not the correct answer to the question that paragraph intends to answer, namely how they render in practice (i.e. in article space).

I'm not aware of any magic wiki syntax to forcibly link to the current page, but linking to a redirect to the current page will render as a link. (Alternatively, there are half a dozen other redirects to here, if you don't like Citations.)

(Untested, MediaWiki doesn't allow previewing that specific part of an edit request.) 155.4.128.166 (talk) 19:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done and tested. ...and that's a good catch and neat fix. Thanks! --N8_wilson 19:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Mistake in the lead section

The second paragraph says, "You can add a citation by selecting from the Cite drop-down menu". But it should be changed to "Insert drop down menu" because that is where I found the option after searching in templates. The Cite menu just has the usual three options- Automatic, Manual and Re-use. Is this a mistake in the lead section that needs to be corrected or am I missing something here? Lord Clayton7 (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 August 2022

Add a link to Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability in the "See also" section. Category:Articles with unsourced statements, the category for articles with {{Citation needed}}, has a link to the WikiProject, so it should be linked on this page too. Ijoe2003 (talk) 07:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done PlanetJuice (talk • contribs) 20:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

why is this page Extended confirmed protected?

... Usersnipedname (nag me/stalk me) 16:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Per the protection log, the page was protected because of a belief that new editors shouldn't be editing it. Given the nature of the page in question, I'm inclined to agree with that assessment, especially given that editors can submit WP:Edit requests if they can't directly edit the page. DonIago (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)