Wikipedia talk:Birthday Committee/Membership Requirements
Appearance
Please see the Membership Requirements section of the WP:BDC talk page. This page is a discussion of changes that should be made to the membership requirements for the Birthday Committee. Create your own section of this page, and leave comments beneath it.
Steveo2
[edit]- I personally feel that not having a recent history of vandalism is important, as to prevent having vandalism left in the name of the Committee. So, I think that the requirements should be: at least 75 edits (that one's already there), 3 months since first edit (as opposed to one), and at least one month since having last been blocked.
Agree?
[edit]- Agree That sounds fine with me. I can understand your concern Steveo. Mr. Turcottetalk 19:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Arguments Against?
[edit]Three months is too long. 75 edits is fine, but I remember having to wait for two whole months before I could join. Esperanza's minimum time is two weeks, & they have an intact reputation. Leave them as they are. Jorcoga 11:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- 3 months is way too long. Does there even need to be a time requirement? Does there even need to be any requirements to copy and paste some text? Anyone could even distribute these templates without being a member; there's nothing stopping them. Greeves (talk • contribs) 16:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I like everything about the requirements except having to wait three months. That is way too long. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 04:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)