Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Autoreviewed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Renamed

[edit]

I've renamed this working proposal to "autoreviewed" (similar to autoconfirmed, autopatrolled) rather than it usurping the old "autoreviewer" which will have many incoming links and people referring to it as such - to alleviate confusion. No prejudice to further renaming if a better title can be thought of. –xenotalk 16:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patroller would be better. Now that I know what you're getting at, this has nothing to do with 'reviewing' in the pending changes sense. Patrolling has been here all along. –xenotalk 18:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC) [comments should not be taken as an endorsement of the proposal][reply]
How about trusted? Marcus Qwertyus (signs his posts) 18:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That would give the erroneous impression that everyone else is untrusted. What I don't understand is why you are spending time on this proposal when it was already pretty much rejected at the pump? As far as I know there have been no rogue patrollers, and we certainly aren't flush with patrollers such that we should go and limit it... –xenotalk 18:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

[edit]

This doesn't seem at all related to "pending changes" as the lead indicates - it seems more to cover patrolling new pages using the patrol ability which is already available to every autoconfirmed user. Does this proposal seek to remove that?...or? –xenotalk 16:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tweaked per above. –xenotalk 18:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]