Wikipedia talk:Aggregate data into lists rather than stubs
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add examples, please
[edit]Please add examples to illustrate what you are saying. E.g. link to an instance of an "asteroid number" that redirects "into a list of related minor planets". Spel-Punc-Gram (talk) 07:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Should editors make improvements to a page like this?
[edit]I have made a number of changes to this essay: notably, in "Updating a list is much faster than stubs", I have rewritten the first sentence.
My question is: while it's obvious one of the foundations of Wikipedia that articles can be edited, is it appropriate to edit an essay – which is someone's personal work?
We could perhaps compare this to the editing of posts in a Talk page: I believe that you're not supposed to edit someone else's post, even if it has typos, grammatical mistakes, poor style, etc. – and even though it's (currently) perfectly possible to for anyone to edit any part of a Talk page. (I say "currently", because the Visual Editor on mobile doesn't allow this, and that may mark a trend towards editing being barred in future.)
I edited a couple of Talk posts years ago, but, if I remember correctly, someone else wrote to me and told me not to.
A comment on my question: I doubt many – if any – people will see my question here, apart from perhaps the essay's author; is there a better place to pose this question? Spel-Punc-Gram (talk) 08:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)