Original first image on the left, added additional image New image isn't used, old image has been properly cropped and skewed to be the right proportions. Both have issues with focus/clarity, old is probably better in color reproduction, so I'd not replace the image. — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Original first image on the left, added additional images for Ford Center for the Performing Arts Oriental Theatre Since no replacements was done no real need to review. But I'd not the picture of the facade is good, it adds to the article, but I think the second image showing most of the building doesn't add anything and isn't as good of an angle as the original and should probably be removed. — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Original first image on the left, added additional images for Belmont-Sheffield Trust and Savings Bank Building The original picture is bad, should consider replacing with something else. The image of the plaque is probably a copyright violation, should consider deleting it (images of things with lots of verbiage like plaques is a copyright violation if the text is copyrighted), the source to your twitter feed for the images was removed, inappropriate and not a WP:RS, the image with the sun-flare was removed as being unhelpful to the article. — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I created the brand new article Meekerville Historic District, all by myself, and I added all the photos I took. Again removed a reference to your twitter feed, is this a regular thing you do if so it needs addressed.... Page has far to many images per our WP:MOS for images consider removing all but 1 or MAYBE 2 images. Two images on a stub is probabably too many. WP:NOTGALLERY — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Original image first on the left, added additional image for State/Lake (CTA station) I don't think the new image adds anything to the article, which is short as it is, and probably doesn't need the second image. — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Superseded image first on the left with additional image for Randolph/Wabash (CTA station). In my humble opinion, the photo I took is of much higher quality than the one another Wikipedian found on Flickr. The new image is better than old for showing that part of the structure, but still more ideal would be actually being lined up with the structure but that would mean standing in the street and getting run over by the insane taxi drivers, but would be a better picture, lol. Don't know why you kept the old version on the page too, it's too small of an article for three pictures. And again you put your twitter as a reference, why? — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Original first image on the left, added additional images for Belmont (CTA North Side Main Line station) Way to over-illustrated, it could probably stand to loose the last 3 images that are stacked up on the right, and even then it would be too much. New images hurts article because of that. So I removed them. Again you put your twitter as a ref in the image captions here? This is probably a huge issue that will need addressed if you've done this in the past, will need to do a check. — raekyt13:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]