Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-06/In the news

In the news

Congressional edits

Last week's press roundup noted the beginnings of media coverage on editing of Wikipedia by Congressional staffers (see related story). The attention continued this week, with many mainstream media and numerous blogs focusing on Wikipedia's decision to block editing from Capitol Hill computers for a week.

On February 1, the Lowell Sun in Massachusetts published "Wikipedia bars Congress from editing entries" by Evan Lehmann, the original Sun reporter who broke the Marty Meehan whitewash story.

The Washington Post published a well-balanced story on their front page on February 3, entitled "On Capitol Hill, Playing WikiPolitics". The article revealed that the questionable edits coming from Meehan's office were the work of a summer intern. It was also one of the few to correctly note the scale of the issue (a few thousand bad edits -- most juvenile pranks rather than Orwellian rewriting of history -- out of the 4.7 million edits made to Wikipedia in December).

Articles

"Reputations taking hits on Web site", The Argus
"Wikipedia and the Credibility of Online Information", Global Politician
"In defence of Wikipedia", NOW Toronto
"How accurate is Wikipedia's content?", Economic Times (India)

Citations in the news

Despite a previously reported internal memo from New York Times business editor Larry Ingrassia warning against use of Wikipedia, the article on mark to market accounting was endorsed as "a pretty good explanation" by the paper Saturday, in a story from Dan Mitchell. The story incorrectly referred to Wikipedia as wikipedia.com instead of wikipedia.org.

Also this week: From the editor — Userbox warring — Password security — ArbCom update — Cartoon chaos — Politicians and Wikipedia — News and notes — Press coverage — Features and admins — B.R.I.O.N. — T.R.O.L.L.

In this issue

6 February 2006 (all comments)

Politicians and Wikipedia

In the news

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

==The Argus== "2006-02-06/In the news" has a Wikilink to The Argus, but it just goes to disambiguation page. It's not clear to me which is the correct Wikipedia article it's meant to point to, or even if there is one. --A bit iffy 09:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add {{Signpost-subscription}}.

Home

About